DYDX / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
DYDX at $0.1252: fear and sub-SMA pricing outweigh the nascent bullish MA structure
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-07-17 00:33 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-29 — Underweight — +4.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-28 — Underweight — +0.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-27 — Underweight — -1.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-26 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-25 — Underweight — -6.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -10.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -10.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-22 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-21 — Underweight — -5.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — -4.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -11.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -10.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -8.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -3.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -1.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +0.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — +0.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -3.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -4.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — +3.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — +1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -2.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — -1.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -8.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -4.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -6.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -10.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -11.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -3.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — +2.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — +2.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -2.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — +2.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Underweight — -1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions
Invalidation: A sustained reclaim of $0.245 would invalidate the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.1103 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, your +3.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, your +3. Key support to defend sits near $0.1103. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugliest exhibit, Mara: DYDX is 48.9% below its 60-day high, and price is beneath every major moving average. But that damage is stale and heavily visible; the SMA50 still leads SMA200 by 3.9%, the MACD histogram is contracting, and the coin is up 5.4% over 30 days. At $0.1252, the market may be nursing a base rather than beginning another collapse.
Leo, your +3.9% moving-average spread is the rear-view mirror, not a bid. The live tape is 7.0% below SMA20, 9.8% below SMA50, and 6.3% below SMA200, with RSI at 45.1—hardly the thrust of a repaired trend. A contracting negative MACD histogram says selling pressure is easing, not that buyers have won.
· Bullish SMA50/SMA200 structure at +3.9%
· Taker buy/sell ratio at 1.05
· Sector-wide institutional crypto adoption
Invalidation: A sustained reclaim of $0.245 would invalidate the bearish ruling.
Mara, easing pressure matters when price is only 13.5% above the $0.1103 60-day low. A floor this close gives the bulls a defined risk box.
Defined risk isn’t defined support, Leo. A 13.5% cushion can vanish quickly when the asset remains 48.9% below $0.245 and under all three key averages.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, easing pressure matters when price is only 13.5% above the $0.1103 60-day low. A floor this close gives the bulls a defined risk box.
Defined risk isn’t defined support, Leo. A 13.5% cushion can vanish quickly when the asset remains 48.9% below $0.245 and under all three key averages.
I’m with Mara on positioning: 46.6% long accounts and a 0.87 L/S ratio show defensive exposure, while taker buy/sell at 1.05 is only a narrow flow improvement. There’s no funding data here to prove shorts are overcrowded or a squeeze is loaded.
And the macro headlines Theo cites are liquidity-adjacent, not DYDX-specific. Institutional ETF and stablecoin activity can lift the sector while leaving a weak altcoin stranded.
I rule for Mara and Dmitri: the decisive exhibit is DYDX trading 9.8% below SMA50 while RSI is 45.1, confirming weak trend control. I would overturn this ruling only on a sustained reclaim of $0.245, the 60-day high.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
I see a damaged short-term chart: price sits 7.0% below SMA20, 9.8% below SMA50, and 6.3% below SMA200, while RSI is only 45.1. The bullish SMA50-versus-SMA200 spread of +3.9% and contracting MACD histogram are the only credible repairs, not a confirmed reversal.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
I’m reading fear, not capitulation: Fear&Greed is 27, only 46.6% of accounts are long, and the L/S ratio is 0.87. Taker buy/sell at 1.05 offers a small demand pulse, but it hasn’t overcome the broader defensive crowd positioning.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
I see institutional crypto infrastructure headlines, from T. Rowe Price’s multi-token ETF to Visa’s Open USD platform, but none directly improves DYDX’s token-specific demand. The news backdrop is sector-positive and coin-light.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
I have no token-economics, revenue, unlock, or protocol-usage figures in this pack, so the fundamental case cannot carry the verdict. The available headlines point to broader institutional adoption, not a DYDX-specific catalyst.
0deebc6fd24c4821ae813085e1e301a8711341aa135d0b9d79dc3c072e41677a70e6e12fe78524df5289beb80d3f4382c89c73b1c7a527091a8c313a2bcf59adCommitted 2026-07-24T10:21:07+00:00 · 67 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-09-05 · 2026-09-01 · 2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25