DYDX / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
DYDX at $0.10745 sits below every major moving average as MACD weakness expands
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-31 01:49 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -10.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -10.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Underweight — -5.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — -4.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -11.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -10.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -8.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -3.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -1.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +0.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — +0.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -3.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -4.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — +3.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — +1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -2.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — -1.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -8.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -4.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -6.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -10.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -11.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -3.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — +2.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — +2.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -2.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — +2.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Underweight — -1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: The bearish call is invalidated by a sustained break above $0.1425.. Cautious read: a break below $0.0953 voids this research. Confidence High — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: I’m Mara Frost.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: I’m Mara Frost. Key support to defend sits near $0.0953. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’m Leo Vance. Theo, the strongest bear number is the 12.2% discount to SMA200, but that’s stale damage already printed into a coin sitting near $0.10745. RSI at 43.4 isn’t capitulation, yet it leaves room for a snapback if the Arcus narrative catches fire; the 60-day high at $0.1425 shows the upside air pocket.
I’m Mara Frost. Leo, calling a 12.2% SMA200 gap “priced in” ignores that price is also 3.7% below SMA20 and 6.8% below SMA50, with the MACD histogram expanding at -0.0004929. Your $0.1425 air pocket is fantasy until DYDX first defeats a stacked bearish moving-average structure.
I’m the aggressive desk. The bearish call leaves more upside underpriced than it admits: DYDX is $0.03505 below the $0.1425 60-day high, while the 60-day low is only $0.01215 below spot. If Arcus converts attention into demand, the 62 Greed reading could become fuel rather than a trap.
I’m the conservative desk. The fastest failure is a break through $0.0953, because the nearest measured floor is only 12.7% below $0.10745 and the trend already shows -7.5% over 7 days. The fragile exhibit is the supposed downside compression; expanding MACD weakness can erase it quickly.
I’m the neutral desk. Leo overreached by treating $0.1425 as accessible upside before any moving-average reclaim, while Mara overreaches if she assumes $0.0953 must fail. The deciding condition is whether price reclaims SMA20 or instead breaks the $0.0953 low.
· Arcus-driven demand surge
· sharp rebound from $0.0953
· crowded long accounts triggering squeeze dynamics
Invalidation: The bearish call is invalidated by a sustained break above $0.1425.
Mara, the 60-day low is $0.0953, only 12.7% below spot, so the downside runway is already compressed while the rebound target is much larger.
Leo, compressed downside is not support; it is merely a nearby floor. A 7-day loss of 7.5% and 30-day loss of 6.0% say sellers still control the slope.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, the 60-day low is $0.0953, only 12.7% below spot, so the downside runway is already compressed while the rebound target is much larger.
Leo, compressed downside is not support; it is merely a nearby floor. A 7-day loss of 7.5% and 30-day loss of 6.0% say sellers still control the slope.
I’m Theo Okafor. Leo, the crowd is not positioned for a clean squeeze: 62.3% of accounts are long, yet taker buy/sell is 0.85. That is bullish exposure meeting weaker immediate demand.
I’m Dmitri Volkov. The Arcus headline is a liquidity story only if capital follows it; this pack shows no flow evidence. Until price reclaims SMA20, the macro tape has no reason to rescue DYDX.
I’m Judge Aldrich: the bearish side wins, and the decisive exhibit is the alignment of price 3.7% below SMA20, 6.8% below SMA50, and 12.2% below SMA200 alongside an expanding -0.0004929 MACD histogram. The ruling is overturned by a sustained break above $0.1425, or by a clear momentum reversal that invalidates the current structure.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
I’m Kai Nakamura. DYDX trades 3.7% below SMA20, 6.8% below SMA50, and 12.2% below SMA200; SMA50 is 5.7% under SMA200. RSI 43.4 is soft, while the MACD histogram at -0.0004929 is expanding.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
I’m Sofia Reyes. Greed at 62 and 62.3% long accounts create a bullish crowd leaning against a weak tape; the long/short ratio is 1.65. Taker buy/sell is only 0.85, and StockTwits has zero messages, so retail enthusiasm has no confirming breadth.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
I’m Ed Walsh. The Arcus launch on Robinhood Chain is the only clearly coin-specific catalyst in the pack, but the headlines describe branding and product expansion rather than a quantified DYDX earnings or usage impact. Saylor’s bitcoin-purchase hint and the hawala-to-Swift feature are broad market noise, not a direct DYDX driver.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
I’m Priya Anand. Arcus pairing stock tokens with perpetuals on Robinhood Chain suggests product ambition, but the pack provides no revenue, volume, fee, token-supply, or valuation figures. Without those fundamentals, the launch cannot outweigh a price sitting 24.6% below its 60-day high.
Paste this into your site. The card shows our latest verdict and settled record, and updates itself.
Media and creators may cite CoinVerdict data with attribution and a link back.
0f97f66f101342a85d02e1f24c4e67f19a899134b4f2a4bd2e0b493fb2ed3fd5Not yet committed. Today's rulings are hashed into the chain after the daily run — until then this report has a fingerprint but no chain entry. · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23