DYDX / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
DYDX’s 0.1222 rebound is fighting a 10.0% SMA20 deficit and Extreme Fear at 25
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-07-16 01:12 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-29 — Underweight — +4.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-28 — Underweight — +0.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-27 — Underweight — -1.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-26 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-25 — Underweight — -6.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -10.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -10.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-22 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-21 — Underweight — -5.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — -4.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -11.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -10.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -8.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -3.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -1.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +0.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — +0.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -3.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -4.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — +3.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — +1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -2.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — -1.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -8.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -4.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -6.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -10.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -11.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -3.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — +2.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — +2.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -2.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — +2.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Underweight — -1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions
Invalidation: A sustained reclaim of 0.1368, the approximate SMA50 level implied by the current 12.3% discount, with RSI above 50 would invalidate the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.1103 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, that 4.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, that 4. Key support to defend sits near $0.1103. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugly number, colleagues: DYDX is down 9.5% over seven days and trades 10.0% below its SMA20. But RSI at 43.1 isn’t a washout, the negative MACD histogram is contracting, and the SMA50 still sits 4.2% above the SMA200—this may be stale damage, not fresh collapse.
Leo, that 4.2% moving-average spread is your key exhibit, and it’s a relic, not a verdict. Price is below every major average—10.0% under SMA20, 12.3% under SMA50, and 8.6% under SMA200—while takers sell at 0.95; calling that bullish structure is polishing a cracked windshield.
· Extreme Fear 25 sparks a relief rally
· Contracting negative MACD histogram
· Bullish SMA50/SMA200 spread of 4.2%
Invalidation: A sustained reclaim of 0.1368, the approximate SMA50 level implied by the current 12.3% discount, with RSI above 50 would invalidate the bearish ruling.
Mara, you’re treating the 0.95 taker ratio like a death sentence, but Extreme Fear at 25 can fuel a snapback. DYDX is only 10.8% above the 0.1103 60-day low, so the panic is already heavily reflected.
Leo, being near the floor doesn’t make the floor strong. The coin is still 50.1% below its 0.245 60-day high, and a 9.5% weekly slide says sellers haven’t finished their sentence.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, you’re treating the 0.95 taker ratio like a death sentence, but Extreme Fear at 25 can fuel a snapback. DYDX is only 10.8% above the 0.1103 60-day low, so the panic is already heavily reflected.
Leo, being near the floor doesn’t make the floor strong. The coin is still 50.1% below its 0.245 60-day high, and a 9.5% weekly slide says sellers haven’t finished their sentence.
I’m with Mara on the tape: long accounts are 47.5% and the L/S ratio is 0.91, so positioning isn’t crowded long enough to promise a squeeze. With funding absent, I can’t invent a carry-based bullish catalyst.
And I won’t bless a macro rebound from generic blockchain headlines. An $18 million oracle exploit keeps liquidity-sensitive DeFi assets under a risk discount, while DYDX has no direct positive fundamental datapoint here.
I award the bear side on the decisive exhibit: DYDX is below all three major moving averages, including a 12.3% gap beneath SMA50. I overturn this ruling only if price reclaims 0.1368, the implied SMA50 level from the 12.3% discount, and holds above it with RSI recovering beyond 50.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
I see a damaged chart, not a clean reversal: DYDX sits 10.0% below its SMA20, 12.3% below its SMA50, and 8.6% below its SMA200. RSI at 43.1 and a contracting negative MACD histogram offer stabilization, while the SMA50 remains 4.2% above the SMA200 and keeps a faint bullish skeleton alive.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
I read a fearful crowd, but not a capitulating one: Fear&Greed is 25, long accounts are only 47.5%, and the long/short ratio is 0.91. Taker buy/sell at 0.95 still shows sellers leaning on the tape; there’s contrarian fuel here, but no confirmed demand surge.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
I’m not buying a DYDX-specific catalyst from this headline set. Tokenized securities gaining live-trading traction and Cantor’s Securitize collaboration support blockchain infrastructure broadly, while the $18 million Ostium exploit reinforces DeFi security risk; neither directly repairs DYDX’s chart.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
I see no DYDX token-economics, revenue, unlock, or protocol-usage figures in this pack, so I won’t manufacture a fundamental rescue story. The available news is sector-level and security-sensitive rather than a direct improvement in DYDX’s value capture.
f82fd5bb19070ea0c1c1115e77a3391ca0c6804f6245534e9ccda0035deecf2b6da543ec34b237c483d95fc9d70813ee7d11bb2d47e02a9a1b3e1847a4282badCommitted 2026-07-24T10:21:07+00:00 · 67 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-09-05 · 2026-09-01 · 2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25