SNX / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
SNX at $0.2245 faces a bearish trend stack, with RSI 46.7 and 27.6% below its 200-day average
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-07-23 00:31 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-29 — Underweight — -2.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-28 — Underweight — -6.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-27 — Underweight — -7.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-26 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-25 — Underweight — -9.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -9.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -8.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-22 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-21 — Underweight — -1.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — -2.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -7.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -6.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -5.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — -2.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -6.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -6.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — -2.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -3.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -4.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — +0.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — +1.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +2.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -2.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — +1.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -0.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -3.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -3.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -1.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -10.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -4.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -2.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -4.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -4.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -4.3% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: A sustained move above $0.2252 accompanied by a reversal of the bearish moving-average structure would overturn the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.191 voids this research. Confidence High — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, that $0.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, that $0. Key support to defend sits near $0.191. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugliest number, Mara: SNX sits 27.6% below SMA200. But the market has already dragged it from the 60-day high of $0.3264 to $0.2245, and RSI at 46.7 is nowhere near a blown-out selloff. The contracting MACD histogram is the first ember in the kindling; a modest rebound toward $0.2252 can start squeezing stale shorts.
Leo, that $0.2245-to-$0.2252 rebound is a thimble masquerading as a tide. The price is below SMA20 and SMA50, while SMA50 is 24.9% below SMA200; your contracting positive MACD is a fading excuse, not a reversal. Worse, 60.1% of long accounts are already leaning into the decline, giving sellers an obvious supply of trapped hopium.
· Oversold reflex rally from $0.191
· Sector-wide boost from digital-asset infrastructure news
· Unexpected crypto risk-on reversal
Invalidation: A sustained move above $0.2252 accompanied by a reversal of the bearish moving-average structure would overturn the bearish ruling.
Mara, trapped longs can become fuel if SNX reclaims $0.2252. Fear&Greed at 31 and a 60-day low of $0.191 leave plenty of room for a reflex rally before the chart reaches true exhaustion.
Leo, reclaiming $0.2252 only recovers today’s high; it does not repair the 27.6% gap to SMA200. Until price clears the short moving averages, that ‘fuel’ is more likely liquidation inventory.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(5)
Mara, trapped longs can become fuel if SNX reclaims $0.2252. Fear&Greed at 31 and a 60-day low of $0.191 leave plenty of room for a reflex rally before the chart reaches true exhaustion.
Leo, reclaiming $0.2252 only recovers today’s high; it does not repair the 27.6% gap to SMA200. Until price clears the short moving averages, that ‘fuel’ is more likely liquidation inventory.
Leo, taker buy/sell at 1.07 is barely constructive, while the 1.51 long/short ratio says positioning is already tilted the wrong way. I’d call the flow a weak bid carrying a heavy backpack, not a squeeze setup.
Mara’s point survives the macro tape: Bitcoin is falling amid Middle East conflict, and crypto is explicitly failing the safe-haven test. IBM’s headline is structural wallpaper when liquidity is defensive.
Dmitri, defensive liquidity is precisely why expectations are low. If SNX holds $0.191 and RSI stays above 46.7, the trade can bounce before the macro clouds clear.
I rule for the bears, and the single decisive exhibit is SNX trading 27.6% below SMA200 while SMA50 sits 24.9% below SMA200. The long-heavy 1.51 ratio and only 1.07 taker buy/sell reinforce the downside setup. My ruling is invalidated by a sustained reclaim above SMA50, or concretely by price breaking and holding above $0.2252 only if the moving-average structure also turns upward.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Kai Nakamura: I see a price trapped below every major trend reference: SNX is 1.4% under SMA20, 3.6% under SMA50, and 27.6% below SMA200. The SMA50 sits 24.9% below SMA200, while the contracting MACD histogram at +0.0007417 offers only a weak countertrend spark.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Sofia Reyes: Fear&Greed at 31 says the crowd is already uncomfortable, but long accounts still control 60.1% with a 1.51 long/short ratio. That is not capitulation; it is a pocket of hopeful buyers exposed beneath a weak chart, while taker buy/sell at 1.07 shows only modest demand.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Ed Walsh: The headlines are a risk-off sandwich: Bitcoin is falling amid Middle East conflict, and crypto is being denied safe-haven status. IBM’s regulated digital-asset platform is constructive for the sector, but the Clarity Act debate remains unresolved and offers SNX no immediate catalyst.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
Priya Anand: The data pack supplies no fresh SNX-specific token-economics or protocol fundamentals. Sector infrastructure headlines from IBM may improve the broader digital-asset backdrop, but they do not offset SNX’s 24.9% SMA50-versus-SMA200 bearish structure.
609d11609b7ec2f1cb9e1d43d4c35eb7a1c978a1e2f6cfe63f7b07fa60a4ac548624d818ee7811d0e765aa63f60423eb1e28fec5823b0c3f5024085df84084a2Committed 2026-07-24T10:21:07+00:00 · 100 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-09-05 · 2026-09-01 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24