SNX / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
SNX at $0.208 sits beneath every major moving-average benchmark, with RSI 44.5 and a 7-day slide of 10.2%
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-30 01:25 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -8.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Underweight — -1.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — -2.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -7.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -6.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -5.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — -2.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -6.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -6.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — -2.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -3.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -4.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — +0.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — +1.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +2.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -2.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — +1.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -0.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -3.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -3.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -1.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -10.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -4.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -2.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -4.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -4.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -4.3% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated if SNX sustains trade above 0.2541, or if RSI rises above 50 while price reclaims SMA50.. Cautious read: a break below $0.1884 voids this research. Confidence High — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, that “losing steam” argument is doing heroic work for a histogram that is still negative.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, that “losing steam” argument is doing heroic work for a histogram that is still negative. Key support to defend sits near $0.1884. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugly number: SNX is 23.8% below SMA200 and down 10.2% in seven days. But RSI at 44.5 isn’t capitulation, and the contracting MACD histogram at -0.0002741 says downside thrust is losing steam; with price still 10.3% above 0.1884, the bear may be selling yesterday’s damage.
Leo, that “losing steam” argument is doing heroic work for a histogram that is still negative. The actual structure is a staircase down: price is below SMA20, SMA50, and SMA200, with SMA50 itself 20.8% beneath SMA200; a 0.208 print is not a reversal, it’s a weak bounce candidate inside a damaged trend.
I think the bearish call has more room than the ruling admits: SNX is 23.8% below SMA200, while the 60-day low at 0.1884 is still 10.3% below price. If RSI 44.5 turns upward and the negative MACD histogram keeps contracting, a squeeze toward 0.2541 is underpriced.
The fastest failure is a sharp rebound from 0.1884, because the MACD histogram is contracting rather than accelerating lower. The fragile exhibit is trend persistence: three prior underweight calls were WIN, but the latest two were PUSH at -1.8% and -2.1% versus BTC.
The aggressive desk overreaches by treating a contracting negative MACD as a reversal, while the conservative desk overstates the record as a guarantee. The deciding condition is whether SNX reclaims 0.2094 and then holds above SMA50; without that, 0.1884 remains the cleaner downside anchor.
· rebound from 0.1884 support
· contracting negative MACD
· greedy long crowd at 61.3%
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated if SNX sustains trade above 0.2541, or if RSI rises above 50 while price reclaims SMA50.
Mara, you’re treating the moving averages like a verdict rather than lagging evidence. RSI 44.5 leaves room for a reflex move before the 0.1884 floor is tested.
Leo, the floor is 10.3% away and the ceiling at 0.2541 is 18.2% away. That asymmetry matters when taker buy/sell is 0.89 and 61.3% of accounts are already long.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, you’re treating the moving averages like a verdict rather than lagging evidence. RSI 44.5 leaves room for a reflex move before the 0.1884 floor is tested.
Leo, the floor is 10.3% away and the ceiling at 0.2541 is 18.2% away. That asymmetry matters when taker buy/sell is 0.89 and 61.3% of accounts are already long.
I’m with Mara on the flow tape: a 1.58 long/short account ratio paired with sub-1.0 taker flow is not clean accumulation. Funding is unavailable, so nobody gets to invent a squeeze premium.
And the macro tape is hostile: Bitcoin is falling amid conflict while crypto is explicitly failing the safe-haven story. IBM’s platform headline is structural, not a liquidity impulse for SNX this week.
I rule for the bear side: underweight is the winning thesis, decided by the bearish moving-average structure reinforced by 0.89 taker buy/sell. The call is overturned by a sustained break above 0.2541, or by RSI reclaiming 50 while price recovers SMA50.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
The direction is bearish: SNX is 1.7% below SMA20, 3.8% below SMA50, and 23.8% below SMA200; SMA50 trails SMA200 by 20.8%. RSI 44.5 and a contracting MACD histogram of -0.0002741 offer only a weak stabilization conflict. Evidence families: moving averages, RSI, MACD, multi-period price trend, support/resistance. Conflicts: MACD is contracting and price remains 10.3% above the 60-day low. Sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
The direction is bearish: Fear & Greed is 69, 61.3% of long accounts are long, the L/S ratio is 1.58, and taker buy/sell is only 0.89. Greedy crowding alongside net taker selling is a poor cushion for a coin down 10.2% over seven days. Evidence families: fear/greed, account positioning, long/short ratio, taker flow. Conflicts: StockTwits had 0 messages, so social confirmation is absent. Sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
The direction is bearish-to-neutral: the headlines frame crypto as failing to act as a safe haven amid Middle East conflict, while a $1.1 million crypto-card hack reportedly crashed a neobank token by 49%. IBM's regulated digital-asset platform is constructive for the sector, but it supplies no SNX-specific catalyst.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
The direction is neutral-to-bearish: the data pack provides no SNX-specific fundamental catalyst, token-economics update, or adoption metric. Sector infrastructure news from IBM is too broad to offset SNX's 23.8% discount to SMA200.
Paste this into your site. The card shows our latest verdict and settled record, and updates itself.
Media and creators may cite CoinVerdict data with attribution and a link back.
6883827999de7e03e6851b7f9c2f913340ccf012db39821ee8e0a11b3ecc87870071e3de26d06e3c755183e93ee239d43345bcb211c72f3e329230375244b41bCommitted 2026-08-31T00:20:00+00:00 · 92 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23 · 2026-08-22