SNX / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
SNX at $0.2125 sits beneath a 20.7% bearish SMA50–SMA200 spread
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-29 01:32 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -8.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Underweight — -1.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — -2.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -7.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -6.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -5.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — -2.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -6.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -6.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — -2.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -3.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -4.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — +0.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — +1.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +2.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -2.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — +1.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -0.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -3.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -3.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -1.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -10.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -4.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -2.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -4.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -4.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -4.3% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: A sustained reclaim of $0.2541, the 60-day high, overturns the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.1884 voids this research. Confidence High — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, the SMA20 is a razor-thin defense against a much larger trend failure.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, the SMA20 is a razor-thin defense against a much larger trend failure. Key support to defend sits near $0.1884. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugliest number: SNX is 22.3% below its SMA200 and the 24-hour move is -7.809%. But RSI at 47.4 isn’t capitulation, price is still 0.3% above SMA20, and the 30-day return is +2.4%; that makes the flush look more like stale weakness than a fresh collapse.
Leo, the SMA20 is a razor-thin defense against a much larger trend failure. Price remains 1.9% below SMA50, SMA50 sits 20.7% under SMA200, and the MACD histogram is contracting—your +2.4% monthly bounce is exactly the kind of hopium a broken chart manufactures.
I think the downside has more room than the ruling admits: spot at $0.2125 is still 12.7% above the $0.1884 60-day low, while 60.4% long accounts leave a crowded air pocket. The recent 24-hour loss of 7.809% shows that crowd can unwind quickly.
The fastest failure is a sharp rebound from the $0.1884 floor; RSI at 47.4 is not oversold, price is 0.3% above SMA20, and MACD remains positive at +0.0008149. The fragile exhibit is extrapolating the 22.3% SMA200 gap into immediate continuation; the settled record has 3 WIN and 0 LOSS, but that streak does not guarantee the next resolution.
Leo overreached by treating a +2.4% 30-day return as proof of stale weakness; Mara overreached if she treats the SMA200 gap as an imminent breakdown. The deciding condition is whether SNX breaks $0.1884 or reclaims $0.2541.
· crowded longs unwind abruptly
· rebound from $0.1884 support
· macro conflict-driven crypto volatility
Invalidation: A sustained reclaim of $0.2541, the 60-day high, overturns the bearish ruling.
Leo, your RSI 47.4 proves neither exhaustion nor reversal; it simply says sellers haven’t finished the job.
Mara, the 60-day low is $0.1884, 12.7% below spot, so the market hasn’t broken the floor you’re treating as inevitable.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Leo, your RSI 47.4 proves neither exhaustion nor reversal; it simply says sellers haven’t finished the job.
Mara, the 60-day low is $0.1884, 12.7% below spot, so the market hasn’t broken the floor you’re treating as inevitable.
I’m with Mara on the crowding: 60.4% of accounts are long and the L/S ratio is 1.52. Taker buy/sell at 1.04 is too mild to offset that imbalance, and funding is unavailable—not evidence of healthy demand.
Both of you are underweighting the tape’s regime: Bitcoin is falling on conflict headlines, and the pack explicitly says crypto is not a haven. A token 22.3% below its SMA200 has little macro shelter.
I rule for the bear side: underweight is the winning thesis, and the decisive exhibit is the bearish moving-average structure—SMA50 is 20.7% below SMA200 while spot is 22.3% below SMA200. The ruling is invalidated by a sustained move above the 60-day high at $0.2541, especially if RSI(14) also clears 50.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Direction: bearish. Evidence families: trend structure, moving averages, momentum, key levels. Conflicts: RSI(14) is neutral at 47.4, price is 0.3% above SMA20, and MACD histogram is positive at +0.0008149 but contracting. Sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Direction: bearish. Evidence families: Fear & Greed at 68, long-account share at 60.4%, long/short ratio at 1.52, taker buy/sell at 1.04. Conflicts: taker flow is marginally supportive, while StockTwits supplied 0 messages. Sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
I’m seeing no SNX-specific catalyst in the pack. The dominant macro headline says Bitcoin fell amid Middle East conflict and crypto is not acting as a haven; IBM’s digital-asset platform story is sector-level, not a direct SNX driver.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
I find no fresh SNX token-economics, protocol-growth, or valuation data here. The IBM announcement may validate regulated digital-asset infrastructure broadly, but it provides no measurable fundamental impulse for SNX.
eccf59d1751caad72bcf50cbc42591b3578cb2452612d2d5e8312f8d775ad07badde2046047c35b2be3d774c5e58080e229d71d404353d96fdaed9f2e1bcf4e2Committed 2026-08-30T00:20:00+00:00 · 91 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-30 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23 · 2026-08-22