JST / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
JST sits at $0.09744 with RSI 38.3 and a 5.5% weekly slide
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-30 02:25 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Mixed
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Shorts pay
C
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-23 — Overweight — -10.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Overweight — -16.3% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Neutral — -16.3% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Overweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Overweight — -18.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Neutral — -16.9% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Neutral — -4.9% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — +9.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Overweight — +2.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Overweight — +2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Overweight — -2.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Overweight — -4.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Overweight — -4.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Overweight — -7.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Overweight — -6.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Overweight — -0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Neutral — +2.5% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Neutral — +6.3% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Neutral — +5.1% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Neutral — +3.0% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Overweight — +4.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Overweight — +2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Overweight — +0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Overweight — +0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Neutral — +2.4% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 4 exchanges
Invalidation: A move above $0.11, the 60-day high, overturns the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.08664 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo’s long-term staircase doesn’t rescue the immediate breakdown.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo’s long-term staircase doesn’t rescue the immediate breakdown. Key support to defend sits near $0.08664. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugly print: JST is down 5.5% over seven days, RSI is 38.3, and the latest close is $0.09719. But that is a pullback inside a still-elevated structure—price remains 21.4% above SMA200, with SMA50 above SMA200 by 27.7%; the MACD histogram is contracting, so the short-term selloff may be losing fuel. My problem is that the recent calls were already punished: overweight on August 21 lost 16.3% versus BTC, and overweight on August 16 lost 18.1%.
Leo’s long-term staircase doesn’t rescue the immediate breakdown. The number that matters for this call is the cluster of short-term weakness: price is 5.5% below SMA20, 4.9% below SMA50, and takers are running at 0.85 buy/sell while Fear&Greed is still 69. A contracting negative MACD histogram is not a reversal; it is merely less acceleration downward, and the $0.11 60-day high is still 11.6% away.
· bullish SMA50/SMA200 structure
· contracting negative MACD histogram
· macro liquidity rebound
Invalidation: A move above $0.11, the 60-day high, overturns the bearish ruling.
Mara, you’re treating $0.09719 like a cliff when the 60-day low is $0.08664—12.2% below spot. That distance and the +21.4% SMA200 gap say the broader chart hasn’t cracked.
Leo, that same 12.2% air pocket is downside, not comfort. With greed at 69 and taker flow at 0.85, the market has room to discover that support the hard way.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, you’re treating $0.09719 like a cliff when the 60-day low is $0.08664—12.2% below spot. That distance and the +21.4% SMA200 gap say the broader chart hasn’t cracked.
Leo, that same 12.2% air pocket is downside, not comfort. With greed at 69 and taker flow at 0.85, the market has room to discover that support the hard way.
I’ll referee the crowd tape: only 30.1% of accounts are long, ratio 0.43. That reduces obvious long crowding, but it doesn’t offset aggressive taker selling; the flow still favors pressure before repair.
The debt and liquidity headlines offer no JST-specific cushion. Until broader crypto liquidity improves, a token already 5.5% below SMA20 is vulnerable to another macro-driven leg.
I rule for the bear side: underweight. The decisive exhibit is the synchronized short-term weakness—JST is 5.5% below SMA20, RSI is 38.3, and taker buy/sell is 0.85—despite greed at 69. This differs from the losing August 21 and August 16 overweight calls because today’s ruling explicitly follows the short-term breakdown rather than the bullish long-term moving-average structure. I overturn this ruling if JST reclaims $0.11, the 60-day high.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
I see short-term damage: price is 5.5% below SMA20 and 4.9% below SMA50, while RSI is 38.3. The larger trend still has a bullish backbone, with price 21.4% above SMA200 and SMA50 leading SMA200 by 27.7%.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
I read a greedy crowd leaning defensively: Fear&Greed is 69, yet only 30.1% of accounts are long and the long/short ratio is 0.43. Taker buy/sell at 0.85 confirms sellers have the immediate edge; there are no StockTwits messages to provide a counter-signal.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
I’m not seeing a JST-specific catalyst in this tape. The headlines revolve around $40 trillion U.S. debt, crypto liquidity rails, tax gains, and a $1.1 million card hack that crushed another token by 49%—macro context, not a JST earnings-style driver.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
I have no JST-specific token-economics, protocol, supply, or adoption figures in the pack. The available evidence therefore supports a market-structure verdict, not a durable fundamental thesis.
e6f20e818022f8dab1d67dc433a900b81196e973867f7c37fe9c780a7137abbf0071e3de26d06e3c755183e93ee239d43345bcb211c72f3e329230375244b41bCommitted 2026-08-31T00:20:00+00:00 · 92 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-23 · 2026-08-21