JST / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
JST slips 8.3% in 7 days as RSI 38.2 and expanding negative MACD favor downside
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-28 02:13 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Shorts pay
D
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-23 — Overweight — -10.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Overweight — -16.3% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Neutral — -16.3% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Overweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Overweight — -18.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Neutral — -16.9% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Neutral — -4.9% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — +9.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Overweight — +2.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Overweight — +2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Overweight — -2.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Overweight — -4.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Overweight — -4.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Overweight — -7.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Overweight — -6.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Overweight — -0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Neutral — +2.5% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Neutral — +6.3% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Neutral — +5.1% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Neutral — +3.0% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Overweight — +4.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Overweight — +2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Overweight — +0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Overweight — +0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Neutral — +2.4% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 4 exchanges
Invalidation: A sustained recovery above 0.1034, paired with a positive MACD histogram, overturns the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.08457 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo’s 22.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo’s 22. Key support to defend sits near $0.08457. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugly number: JST is down 8.3% over seven days, with RSI at 38.2 and MACD histogram expanding negative. But the tape is pulling back inside a larger uptrend—price is still 22.7% above SMA200, while SMA50 stands 28.8% above it—so this looks like a bruised engine, not a blown one. The recent neutral call on August 20 resolved FLAT_OUT at -16.3% versus BTC, and the August 16 overweight call was a LOSS at -18.1%; that record hurts, but today’s explicit downside momentum gives the underweight case a cleaner exhibit.
Leo’s 22.7% above-SMA200 number is rear-view-mirror comfort, not a defense of the next move. Price is 5.5% below SMA20 and 4.7% below SMA50, taker buy/sell is only 0.94, and Greed is still 73—classic dip-buying optimism while the market is leaking. The August 16 overweight LOSS at -18.1% versus BTC shows how badly bullish framing can age when relative weakness takes control.
I think the bearish ruling still leaves room on the table: JST is 11.3% below the 60-day high at 0.11, while Greed remains 73 and taker buy/sell is 0.94. If demand worsens, the 0.08457 low is 15.3% below the current price, so the downside pocket is larger than the ruling’s tone suggests.
The fastest failure is a snapback from RSI 38.2 while the long-term trend asserts itself: price remains 22.7% above SMA200 and SMA50 is 28.8% above SMA200. That bullish structure is the fragile exhibit for the bearish call, especially if price reclaims 0.1034.
I think Leo overreaches by treating SMA200 as near-term protection, while Mara overreaches if she treats Greed 73 as proof of trapped longs when only 32.7% of accounts are long. The deciding condition is whether price reclaims 0.1034 or continues below the 0.097-level area with MACD still expanding negative.
· bullish SMA200 structure
· RSI-driven rebound
· thin JST-specific news evidence
Invalidation: A sustained recovery above 0.1034, paired with a positive MACD histogram, overturns the bearish ruling.
Mara, you’re treating RSI 38.2 like a death certificate. The 60-day low is 0.08457, still 15.3% below here, and the long-term moving-average structure remains bullish.
Leo, the 60-day low is exactly why your comfort is dangerous: there is room to fall before the chart reaches an obvious floor. A 5.5% SMA20 gap and expanding MACD damage matter now, not the distant SMA200.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, you’re treating RSI 38.2 like a death certificate. The 60-day low is 0.08457, still 15.3% below here, and the long-term moving-average structure remains bullish.
Leo, the 60-day low is exactly why your comfort is dangerous: there is room to fall before the chart reaches an obvious floor. A 5.5% SMA20 gap and expanding MACD damage matter now, not the distant SMA200.
I’m siding with the bear on flow, though not on crowding: only 32.7% of accounts are long and the L/S ratio is 0.49. That leaves less forced-long fuel, but taker flow at 0.94 still says immediate demand is losing the argument.
No funding rate is supplied, so nobody gets to invent a carry story. With no JST-specific news catalyst and a 7-day decline of 8.3%, liquidity optimism is doing more work than evidence.
I rule for the bearish side: underweight wins on the decisive exhibit, the expanding negative MACD alongside price sitting 5.5% below SMA20 and 4.7% below SMA50. This call differs from the recent losing neutral and overweight records because the current pack combines a concrete short-term breakdown with Greed at 73 and taker flow below parity. My ruling is invalidated by a recovery above 0.1034, which would erase the SMA20 deficit, or by a momentum reversal that turns the MACD histogram positive.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Direction: bearish. Evidence families: momentum, moving averages, trend structure. Conflicts: price remains 22.7% above SMA200 and SMA50 sits 28.8% above SMA200. Sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Direction: bearish. Evidence families: Fear&Greed at 73, account-side ratios, taker flow. Conflicts: only 32.7% of accounts are long, so directional crowding is not extreme. Sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
JST has no coin-specific catalyst in the supplied headlines. The news tape is dominated by RLUSD, Bitcoin infrastructure, stablecoin rails, Kalshi litigation, and Ethena’s buyback narrative; none directly repairs JST’s weakening short-term chart.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
The pack supplies no JST-specific token-economics, adoption, revenue, or protocol-fundamental evidence. The bullish SMA200 structure is a market-structure fact, not a fresh fundamental catalyst.
8a509887bb0e077ae1665685820fa8fa647229a9e7ee0b43276d7ab257e3728ab460912c22e647ff99deef7428c2f0098da84f163350ba433a36d11ce82e7419Committed 2026-08-29T00:20:00+00:00 · 98 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-23 · 2026-08-21