JST / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
JST at $0.094565 faces a bearish momentum squeeze despite its bullish long-term moving-average structure
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-31 02:57 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Shorts pay
D
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-23 — Overweight — -10.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Overweight — -16.3% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Neutral — -16.3% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Overweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Overweight — -18.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Neutral — -16.9% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Neutral — -4.9% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — +9.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Overweight — +2.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Overweight — +2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Overweight — -2.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Overweight — -4.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Overweight — -4.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Overweight — -7.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Overweight — -6.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Overweight — -0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Neutral — +2.5% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Neutral — +6.3% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Neutral — +5.1% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Neutral — +3.0% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Overweight — +4.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Overweight — +2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Overweight — +0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Overweight — +0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Neutral — +2.4% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 4 exchanges
Invalidation: A sustained reclaim of $0.09517 together with a non-expanding MACD histogram would overturn the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.08757 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, your SMA200 is the museum piece, not the live tape: price is 7.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, your SMA200 is the museum piece, not the live tape: price is 7. Key support to defend sits near $0.08757. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugly number, colleagues: JST is down 9.4% over 30 days, with MACD at -0.001255 and expanding. But RSI 33.7 is already bruised, and the coin still trades 17.5% above SMA200 while SMA50 towers 27.0% over SMA200; the short-term washout may be stale damage rather than a fresh structural break. My recent calls were poor—overweight on Aug 23 lost 10.1% versus BTC, Aug 21 lost 16.3%, and Aug 16 lost 18.1%—so this is a narrower rebound case, not a victory lap.
Leo, your SMA200 is the museum piece, not the live tape: price is 7.9% below SMA20, 7.5% below SMA50, down 6.2% in seven days, and the MACD deterioration is expanding. RSI 33.7 does not force a bounce, especially with Fear&Greed still at 62 and takers at only 0.94; that is a wounded market still carrying greed. The Aug 23, Aug 21, and Aug 16 overweight calls all lost—10.1%, 16.3%, and 18.1% versus BTC—so the burden is on the bullish structure to prove it can matter now.
· RSI-driven rebound
· defense of the $0.08757 low
· bullish SMA200 structure
Invalidation: A sustained reclaim of $0.09517 together with a non-expanding MACD histogram would overturn the bearish ruling.
Mara, the immediate damage is obvious, but the 60d low is $0.08757—7.8% below spot—and RSI 33.7 gives the tape room to mean-revert before that floor is tested.
Leo, $0.08757 is not support until buyers defend it; the active evidence is price below both SMA20 and SMA50, with MACD worsening rather than stabilizing.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, the immediate damage is obvious, but the 60d low is $0.08757—7.8% below spot—and RSI 33.7 gives the tape room to mean-revert before that floor is tested.
Leo, $0.08757 is not support until buyers defend it; the active evidence is price below both SMA20 and SMA50, with MACD worsening rather than stabilizing.
Leo, I’m not seeing clean accumulation: long accounts are just 28.1%, L/S is 0.39, and taker buy/sell is 0.94. Funding is absent, so nobody gets to invent a squeeze narrative.
The macro headlines offer no JST-specific liquidity tailwind. With JST down 9.4% over 30 days, the higher-timeframe SMA200 gap is a cushion, not proof that liquidity will arrive.
I rule for the bear side: underweight. The decisive exhibit is the combination of price 7.9% below SMA20, 7.5% below SMA50, and an expanding -0.001255 MACD histogram, which outweighs the lagging bullish MA structure. This ruling is different from the recent losing overweight calls because the current pack shows active short-term deterioration and greed at 62, not a fresh bullish trigger. I overturn it if JST reclaims $0.09517 and the MACD histogram stops expanding; a break of $0.08757 would reinforce it.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
RSI(14) is 33.7, while price sits 7.9% below SMA20 and 7.5% below SMA50. MACD histogram is -0.001255 and expanding; the bullish backdrop is that price remains 17.5% above SMA200 and SMA50 stands 27.0% above SMA200.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
I read a fragile crowd: Fear&Greed is 62 (Greed), yet only 28.1% of accounts are long, the L/S ratio is 0.39, and taker buy/sell is 0.94. That combination supports downside pressure, while StockTwits contributes no evidence because there were 0 messages.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
The supplied headlines focus on Solana activity, XRP brokerage, Bitcoin buying hints, and money-transfer history—not JST-specific catalysts. I find no coin-level news impulse here to offset JST’s 7d decline of 6.2% and 30d decline of 9.4%.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
The pack provides no JST-specific token-economics, adoption, unlock, or protocol-financial data. I therefore give fundamentals limited weight and do not manufacture a fundamental catalyst from unrelated Solana or XRP headlines.
8b2a324f09b282df00b41e42b1cdcc4297dbefb28a530887e58143222607c56bNot yet committed. Today's rulings are hashed into the chain after the daily run — until then this report has a fingerprint but no chain entry. · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-23 · 2026-08-21