WLD / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
WLD’s 0.3736 rebound has momentum behind it, but greed is already at 72
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-21 01:44 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bullish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bullish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -5.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Overweight — +4.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Overweight — -0.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Overweight — -8.0% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Overweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Overweight — -4.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Overweight — +0.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — +17.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +13.7% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — +13.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — +6.5% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +6.7% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — +4.0% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -0.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -4.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — +1.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — +0.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — -1.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -8.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -10.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -11.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -18.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -17.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -14.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -12.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -3.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -8.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -3.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -6.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -10.4% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: A daily close below 0.3704 accompanied by RSI below 50 overturns the bullish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.3704 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo is dressing a short squeeze in trend-following clothes.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bullish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: I concede the ugliest number: WLD is still 40. Resistance to clear sits near $0.5. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I concede the ugliest number: WLD is still 40.7% below the 60-day high at 0.6297, and SMA50 sits 0.2% under SMA200. But the tape has changed from the stale underweight calls: price is 12.0% above SMA20, RSI is a healthy 58.8, MACD is expanding at +0.007801, and the coin is up 9.3% over seven days. I was wrong to ignore the prior underweight losses on August 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, which returned +6.7%, +6.5%, +13.9%, +13.7%, and +17.9% versus BTC; this time the current trend evidence outweighs the lagging MA blemish.
Leo is dressing a short squeeze in trend-following clothes. His prized +9.3% seven-day move sits beside a -2.9% 30-day return, while greed at 72 and 60.8% long accounts show the chase is already crowded. The six losing underweight calls prove the old stance was badly timed, not that 0.3736 has escaped the broader damage or earned a clean bullish structure.
I think the ruling still undershoots the upside: WLD is only 4.3% above SMA200 while the 60-day low is 0.293, leaving a broad recovery path if MACD’s +0.007801 expansion persists. The 0.5 target mentioned in headlines is still 33.8% above 0.3736, so the market may be underpricing continuation.
The fastest failure is a crowded momentum unwind: Fear&Greed at 72, 60.8% long accounts, and an L/S ratio of 1.55 can turn the 0.3704 candle low into a trap. The most fragile exhibit is the +9.3% seven-day burst, because the 30-day reading remains -2.9%.
The bearish side overreaches by treating the old underweight record as proof that today’s tape must fail; those calls lost from August 5 through 9, with returns from +4.0% to +17.9% versus BTC. The deciding condition is whether WLD holds 0.3704 while RSI stays above 50.
· crowded greed and long-account exposure
· SMA50 below SMA200
· 30-day return still -2.9%
Invalidation: A daily close below 0.3704 accompanied by RSI below 50 overturns the bullish ruling.
Mara, the 30-day -2.9% figure is backward-looking; the live structure is price above all three moving averages, with MACD expanding. You’re using the rear-view mirror while the seven-day tape is up 9.3%.
Leo, price above SMA200 by 4.3% is hardly a fortress when the 60-day high is 0.6297 and the 30-day return is still -2.9%. A crowded 72 greed reading makes your breakout argument fragile.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, the 30-day -2.9% figure is backward-looking; the live structure is price above all three moving averages, with MACD expanding. You’re using the rear-view mirror while the seven-day tape is up 9.3%.
Leo, price above SMA200 by 4.3% is hardly a fortress when the 60-day high is 0.6297 and the 30-day return is still -2.9%. A crowded 72 greed reading makes your breakout argument fragile.
I’ll split the difference: taker buy/sell at 1.07 supports real near-term demand, but the 1.55 L/S ratio and 60.8% long accounts show directional crowding. Funding is not provided, so nobody gets to claim funding confirms the squeeze.
Macro liquidity headlines may lift crypto beta, but they do not erase WLD’s 40.7% drawdown from the 60-day high. I’d treat the broad backdrop as a tailwind, not a WLD-specific engine.
I rule for the bullish side: WLD is overweight over a weeks horizon. The decisive exhibit is the synchronized short-term turn—+9.3% over seven days, price 12.0% above SMA20, RSI 58.8, and expanding MACD—despite the still-bearish SMA50/SMA200 relationship. This differs from the August 5–9 underweight losses because the current pack shows sustained price recovery above SMA20, SMA50, and SMA200 rather than merely a relative-performance miss. The ruling is invalidated by a daily close below 0.3704, the latest candle low, especially if RSI falls below 50.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
RSI(14) is 58.8, MACD histogram is expanding at +0.007801, and WLD trades 12.0% above SMA20, 4.5% above SMA50, and 4.3% above SMA200. The counterweight is structural: SMA50 remains 0.2% below SMA200, while the coin is still 40.7% beneath the 60-day high of 0.6297.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
The crowd is leaning bullish: Fear&Greed is 72, long accounts are 60.8% with an L/S ratio of 1.55, taker buy/sell is 1.07, and StockTwits shows 13 bullish versus 0 bearish messages. That enthusiasm is a real reversal risk, especially after the recent squeeze headlines.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Headlines are amplifying the move, from Arthur Hayes backing Sam Altman’s crypto project to reports of a 6.29% WLD squeeze. Macro regulation and Treasury-buyback stories are supportive for crypto broadly, but neither provides a WLD-specific fundamental catalyst.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
The data pack supplies no token-supply, valuation, adoption, or network-usage figures, so the fundamental case is limited. The actionable evidence is price and flow behavior, not a proven improvement in Worldcoin economics.
f072fa0c64a69e9447d57ae557fc892fcaa506e016dba37bbf63ff82ed9ad21b5c21c070ba128f2a35607134962360a82f87d1bc3398b693184c1393829130b0Committed 2026-08-22T00:20:00+00:00 · 92 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23 · 2026-08-22