WLD / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
WLD at $0.3813 still trades below its 20-day average, with RSI at 43.6 and a 30-day loss of 38.4%
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-07-22 09:21 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Mixed
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-29 — Underweight — -0.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-28 — Overweight — -8.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-27 — Overweight — -6.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-26 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-25 — Neutral — -10.3% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-24 — Overweight — -8.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -5.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-22 — Overweight — — — VOID
2026-08-21 — Overweight — +4.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Overweight — -0.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Overweight — -8.0% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Overweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Overweight — -4.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Overweight — +0.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — +17.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +13.7% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — +13.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — +6.5% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +6.7% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — +4.0% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -0.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -4.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — +1.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — +0.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — -1.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -8.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -10.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -11.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -18.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -17.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -14.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -12.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -3.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -8.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -3.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -6.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -10.4% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions
Invalidation: A sustained close above $0.3950 accompanied by RSI(14) above 50 would invalidate the bearish swing call.. Cautious read: a break below $0.3743 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo’s “engine” is idling beneath every meaningful near-term checkpoint.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo’s “engine” is idling beneath every meaningful near-term checkpoint. Key support to defend sits near $0.3743. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugliest number: WLD is down 38.4% in 30 days and sits 18.4% beneath SMA50. But that damage is already splashed across the tape; the expanding MACD histogram at +0.0008627 and the bullish SMA50-versus-SMA200 spread of 20.9% say the engine is trying to turn before the crowd notices.
Leo’s “engine” is idling beneath every meaningful near-term checkpoint. A positive MACD histogram of +0.0008627 has produced a price still 3.5% below SMA20 and 18.4% below SMA50, while the 60-day high at $0.7229 is 47.3% away—hardly a repaired chart.
· ETF-filing or OpenAI-linked headline spike
· Break above $0.3950
· MACD acceleration and long-term MA support
Invalidation: A sustained close above $0.3950 accompanied by RSI(14) above 50 would invalidate the bearish swing call.
Mara, you’re treating the 60-day high as a verdict instead of overhead supply. At $0.3813, the relevant question is whether the $0.3743 session low holds while momentum improves.
Leo, that $0.3743 low is barely 1.8% below spot; a thin floor isn’t a base. RSI at 43.6 is neither washed out nor strong enough to overpower a 30-day collapse.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, you’re treating the 60-day high as a verdict instead of overhead supply. At $0.3813, the relevant question is whether the $0.3743 session low holds while momentum improves.
Leo, that $0.3743 low is barely 1.8% below spot; a thin floor isn’t a base. RSI at 43.6 is neither washed out nor strong enough to overpower a 30-day collapse.
I’m with Mara on positioning: 51.8% of accounts are long, L/S is 1.07, and taker buy/sell is 0.95. That’s mild long bias without aggressive buying—an awkward setup for the bulls.
And the macro tape won’t hand Leo a free rebound. Bitcoin is under $66,000, while the stablecoin exploit is a fresh reminder that liquidity can vanish faster than a narrative can trend.
I award the bear side the ruling, based decisively on WLD trading 18.4% below SMA50 while takers sell more than they buy at a 0.95 ratio. The bullish MACD and long-term moving-average structure are credible counterevidence, but they have not repaired price. I overturn this ruling on a sustained close above $0.3950, with RSI reclaiming 50.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Kai Nakamura: Bearish. WLD sits 3.5% below SMA20 and 18.4% below SMA50, while RSI(14) is 43.6. MACD histogram is expanding at +0.0008627 and SMA50 remains 20.9% above SMA200, but price has not reclaimed the short- and medium-term averages.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Sofia Reyes: Bearish. Fear & Greed is 33, and taker buy/sell is 0.95, showing a crowd still leaning defensive. Long accounts hold 51.8% with an L/S ratio of 1.07, so positioning is only mildly long rather than capitulation-clean.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Ed Walsh: Headline flow is supportive but speculative: reports cite an 8% WLD jump after Grayscale’s ETF filing and OpenAI-related optimism. The broader tape is less forgiving, with Bitcoin below $66,000 and a stablecoin exploit draining $1 million from bitcoin reserves.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
Priya Anand: The data pack provides no token-supply, unlock, adoption, revenue, or valuation figures. The fundamental case therefore rests on narrative catalysts—ETF speculation and OpenAI’s IPO ambitions—rather than measurable economic traction.
d24fb59967ce5d89cfbd9470b2d79f63411d87c3cc1978c4137c0e0727c92a8dd60befb007b8b2c9bb2f3e860a595495bb4427a42c1d8f8851947ca5b9c4caf9Committed 2026-07-24T10:21:07+00:00 · 98 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-09-05 · 2026-09-01 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24