WLD / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
WLD is pinned at $0.3431 as bearish momentum overwhelms the bullish moving-average structure
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-07-26 00:46 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Shorts pay
C
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-30 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-29 — Underweight — -0.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-28 — Overweight — -8.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-27 — Overweight — -6.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-26 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-25 — Neutral — -10.3% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-24 — Overweight — -8.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -5.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-22 — Overweight — — — VOID
2026-08-21 — Overweight — +4.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Overweight — -0.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Overweight — -8.0% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Overweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Overweight — -4.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Overweight — +0.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — +17.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +13.7% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — +13.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — +6.5% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +6.7% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — +4.0% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -0.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -4.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — +1.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — +0.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — -1.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -8.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -10.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -11.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -18.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -17.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -14.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -12.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -3.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -8.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -3.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -6.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -10.4% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: A sustained reclaim above $0.3820, approximately the SMA200 level implied by the current 10.1% discount, overturns the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.2741 voids this research. Confidence High — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, that 19.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, that 19. Key support to defend sits near $0.2741. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I concede the ugly number, Mara: WLD is down 26.6% over 30 days and trades 24.7% below SMA50. But RSI at 36.8 is already bruised, and the SMA50 sits 19.4% above SMA200—this can be stale downside, with the 60-day low at $0.2741 offering a defined launchpad.
Leo, that 19.4% moving-average spread is a rear-view mirror, not a rescue boat. The live tape has WLD below SMA20, SMA50, and SMA200 by 10.2%, 24.7%, and 10.1%, while MACD at -0.001706 is expanding; the market is still paying sellers.
· ETF-filing follow-through
· short-covering from RSI 36.8
· token-sale supply absorption
Invalidation: A sustained reclaim above $0.3820, approximately the SMA200 level implied by the current 10.1% discount, overturns the bearish ruling.
Leo, you’re dressing a lagging average in a bullish costume. WLD is only $0.3431 after losing 5.0% in seven days and 26.6% in 30 days.
Mara, the 60-day low is $0.2741, 25.1% below spot, and RSI 36.8 leaves room for a reflex rally. Your downside case needs fresh selling, not just yesterday’s bruises.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Leo, you’re dressing a lagging average in a bullish costume. WLD is only $0.3431 after losing 5.0% in seven days and 26.6% in 30 days.
Mara, the 60-day low is $0.2741, 25.1% below spot, and RSI 36.8 leaves room for a reflex rally. Your downside case needs fresh selling, not just yesterday’s bruises.
Leo, the crowd hasn’t fully washed out: 51.7% of accounts are long, the L/S ratio is 1.07, and taker flow is 0.99. That’s a mildly long book leaning into a weak tape—hardly clean contrarian fuel.
Theo’s right. With WLD 52.6% below the 60-day high of $0.7229, the liquidity regime is already hostile, and an ETF headline has failed to hold the trend. Hopium needs follow-through; the pack shows none.
I rule for the bears, decided by the expanding -0.001706 MACD histogram alongside WLD trading below all three tracked moving averages. I overturn this ruling only if price reclaims $0.3820, the implied SMA200 level from the 10.1% discount, and holds above it.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Bearish. RSI is 36.8, price sits 10.2% below SMA20 and 24.7% below SMA50, while the MACD histogram is negative at -0.001706 and expanding. The conflict is SMA50 still 19.4% above SMA200, but price action has the immediate edge; sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Bearish. Fear & Greed is 26, taker buy/sell is 0.99, and long accounts hold 51.7% with an L/S ratio of 1.07. That is fear without a decisive capitulation flush, leaving modest long exposure vulnerable; sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Bearish. Headlines include a 217 million-token project sale tied to funding and allegations of black-market activity, both damaging supply and credibility. ETF-filing headlines produced 7-8% jumps, but those catalysts have not prevented a 26.6% 30-day decline.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
Bearish. The reported sale of 217 million tokens adds a concrete supply overhang, while black-market activity allegations threaten confidence in the project. The ETF filing is a potential catalyst, but the data pack shows no fundamental evidence strong enough to offset the distribution pressure.
3ccdaec602e4f75164fea4176b9d00d7d096803879206476daa9affbf1bfc657abe367d9f6473120ab57274a47b2717a285a90e3afdaff7e89e6c5e549a3ca83Committed 2026-07-27T00:20:00+00:00 · 100 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-09-05 · 2026-09-01 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24