UB / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
UB’s 0.13146 price sits above major averages, but 69 Greed and a 59.0% long-account share temper the rebound
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-30 02:49 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bullish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-23 — Neutral — +5.9% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Underweight — +7.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — -11.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -16.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Neutral — -25.2% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -17.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -5.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Overweight — -7.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Overweight — -10.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Overweight — -8.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +12.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Overweight — -26.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Overweight — -24.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Overweight — -24.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Overweight — -14.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Overweight — -6.5% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — +6.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Overweight — -8.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +55.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Overweight — +19.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Overweight — +37.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Overweight — +27.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Overweight — +21.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Overweight — +24.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 1 exchanges
Invalidation: A daily close below 0.131 overturns the neutral ruling in favor of the bearish case.. Cautious read: a break below $0.131 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo is romanticizing distance from the SMA200.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Neutral, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo is romanticizing distance from the SMA200. Key support to defend sits near $0.131. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I concede Mara’s strongest number: UB is still down 17.5% over 30 days, and the Aug 21 underweight call lost as UB returned +7.1% versus BTC. But that miss is stale evidence against a structure now 46.0% above SMA200, with SMA50 above SMA200 by 36.9% and MACD expanding; the chart has rebuilt its engine.
Leo is romanticizing distance from the SMA200. The same coin is 38.2% below its 60-day high of 0.2126, RSI is only 53.0, and taker buy/sell is 0.95—so the +0.001053 MACD histogram can be a bounce inside a damaged range, not a new trend. The Aug 21 underweight loss at +7.1% versus BTC proves the downside thesis can fail, but it does not validate this rebound as durable.
I see more upside than this ruling admits: UB is up 9.0% in 7 days, MACD is expanding at +0.001053, and the SMA50/SMA200 spread is +36.9%. A reclaim toward the 0.2126 60-day high could be underappreciated if the rebound keeps making higher lows.
The fastest failure is a break below 0.131, because the latest session already printed that low while taker buy/sell was only 0.95. The fragile exhibit is the bullish moving-average stack: it can lag badly after a 30-day decline of 17.5%.
The aggressive case overreaches by treating +9.0% over 7 days as a completed trend reversal; the conservative case overreaches if it ignores price sitting 46.0% above SMA200. The deciding condition is whether UB holds 0.131 while MACD remains positive and expanding.
· crowded long accounts at 59.0%
· taker buy/sell at 0.95
· 30-day decline of 17.5%
Invalidation: A daily close below 0.131 overturns the neutral ruling in favor of the bearish case.
Mara, the 7-day gain is already +9.0% while price holds above SMA20 and SMA50; that’s accumulation-shaped repair, not a dead-cat twitch.
Leo, repair that still leaves UB 38.2% under 0.2126 is not a victory lap. RSI 53.0 gives you no momentum extreme to lean on, and takers are net sellers at 0.95.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, the 7-day gain is already +9.0% while price holds above SMA20 and SMA50; that’s accumulation-shaped repair, not a dead-cat twitch.
Leo, repair that still leaves UB 38.2% under 0.2126 is not a victory lap. RSI 53.0 gives you no momentum extreme to lean on, and takers are net sellers at 0.95.
I’ll interrupt: 59.0% long accounts and a 1.44 L/S ratio show bullish crowding, but funding is absent, so nobody gets to invent a carry signal. That crowding is a headwind, not proof of collapse.
And the macro tape offers no UB-specific liquidity catalyst. With the 30-day return at -17.5%, the market still needs follow-through before this becomes more than relief.
I rule neutral, with the bullish technical structure narrowly offset by crowded greed and weak taker flow. The decisive exhibit is the conflict between price being 46.0% above SMA200 and sentiment showing 69 Greed with a 1.44 L/S ratio. The recent Aug 21 underweight loss (+7.1% versus BTC) differs because today’s moving-average and MACD structure is materially stronger; this ruling is overturned by a daily close below 0.131, the 60-day low-adjacent session low.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Bullish: UB is 5.3% above SMA20, 6.7% above SMA50, and 46.0% above SMA200; SMA50 exceeds SMA200 by 36.9%, while MACD histogram is +0.001053 and expanding. RSI is 53.0, and the 30-day return remains -17.5%, creating a conflict between improving momentum and unfinished medium-term repair. Sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Bearish: Fear&Greed is 69, long accounts are 59.0% with an L/S ratio of 1.44, and taker buy/sell is 0.95. Greed and long skew conflict with net taker selling, while StockTwits supplied no usable sample from 0 messages. Sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
The news tape is split between a TradingView headline claiming UB exploded after the Agent Market launch and an AMBCrypto headline describing a 30% plunge after support failed. The broader headlines—a $1.1 million crypto-card hack and consumer preference for control and micro-investing—offer no direct UB catalyst.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
The pack provides no token-supply, unlock, revenue, adoption, treasury, or valuation data for Unibase. A fundamental conviction call is therefore unavailable from these exhibits.
f67ad0134114009bd5cc57e80ed1d773b48c34c86181cc66c1db506a546cf83d0071e3de26d06e3c755183e93ee239d43345bcb211c72f3e329230375244b41bCommitted 2026-08-31T00:20:00+00:00 · 92 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-23 · 2026-08-22 · 2026-08-21