UB / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
UB’s bullish structure is accelerating: +40.8% in 7 days with RSI at 60.9
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-07-23 00:56 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bullish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bullish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-27 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-25 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-23 — Neutral — +5.9% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-22 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-21 — Underweight — +7.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — -11.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -16.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Neutral — -25.2% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -17.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -5.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Overweight — -7.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Overweight — -10.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Overweight — -8.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +12.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Overweight — -26.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Overweight — -24.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Overweight — -24.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Overweight — -14.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Overweight — -6.5% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — +6.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Overweight — -8.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +55.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Overweight — +19.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Overweight — +37.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Overweight — +27.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Overweight — +21.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Overweight — +24.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 1 exchanges
Invalidation: A sustained break below $0.11 would overturn the bullish ruling and signal that the recent momentum impulse has failed.. Cautious read: a break below $0.05762 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: I’m Mara Frost.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bullish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: I’m Leo Vance. Resistance to clear sits near $0.233. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’m Leo Vance. Mara’s strongest number is the brutal 50.5% gap below UB’s 60-day high at $0.233, but that’s stale overhead supply, not proof the current breakout is broken. Price is 30.3% above SMA20, MACD is expanding at +0.005049, and the 7-day surge of 40.8% says the engine is running now.
I’m Mara Frost. Leo’s +40.8% number is exactly the problem: he’s calling vertical acceleration healthy while UB sits 30.3% above its SMA20. RSI at 60.9 isn’t exhaustion, but it’s high enough for late buyers to become exit liquidity, especially with UB still halfway below $0.233.
· 50.5% below the 60-day high
· momentum extension above SMA20
· macro and crypto-policy headline risk
Invalidation: A sustained break below $0.11 would overturn the bullish ruling and signal that the recent momentum impulse has failed.
Mara, fear at 31 and only 45.8% of long accounts mean the crowd isn’t euphoric; your late-buyer story needs a crowd that actually piled in.
Leo, an L/S ratio of 0.84 doesn’t make the chart safe—it shows longs are already underrepresented and may be chasing a move they missed. The decisive question is whether $0.11 holds, not whether sentiment sounds gloomy.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, fear at 31 and only 45.8% of long accounts mean the crowd isn’t euphoric; your late-buyer story needs a crowd that actually piled in.
Leo, an L/S ratio of 0.84 doesn’t make the chart safe—it shows longs are already underrepresented and may be chasing a move they missed. The decisive question is whether $0.11 holds, not whether sentiment sounds gloomy.
I’m Theo Okafor. Taker buy/sell at 1.03 gives bulls a small but real execution edge, while the 0.84 L/S ratio argues against a crowded long trade. Funding is absent, so nobody gets to manufacture a carry-based squeeze claim.
I’m Dmitri Volkov. I see no liquidity data here, only a market-wide altcoin headline and a policy fight over the Clarity Act. That leaves UB’s rally dependent on momentum surviving a macro tape the pack does not actually measure.
I’m Judge Aldrich. I rule for the bulls, and the decisive exhibit is the aligned trend stack: UB is 30.3% above SMA20, 16.1% above SMA50, and 61.1% above SMA200 with an expanding +0.005049 MACD histogram. My ruling is invalidated by a sustained move below $0.11.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
I’m Kai Nakamura: bullish. Evidence families are RSI, moving-average structure, MACD, and multi-horizon price momentum; conflicts are the 50.5% drawdown from the 60-day high and stretched positioning versus SMA20. Sufficiency is adequate: UB trades 30.3% above SMA20, 16.1% above SMA50, 61.1% above SMA200, while MACD histogram expands at +0.005049.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
I’m Sofia Reyes: bullish, with fear creating room for a squeeze. Evidence families are Fear&Greed at 31, long accounts at 45.8% with an L/S ratio of 0.84, and taker buy/sell at 1.03; the conflict is that fear can also reflect genuine demand weakness. Sufficiency is adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
I’m Ed Walsh: bullish on the immediate tape because Unibase’s Agent Market launch is directly linked to the UB rally, while crypto headlines frame altcoins as leading 24-hour gainers. The broader Clarity Act debate is still a policy overhang, but it has no specific negative UB catalyst in this pack.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
I’m Priya Anand: the Agent Market launch is the only concrete fundamental-style catalyst supplied, and it gives the move a token-specific narrative. The pack provides no token-supply, unlock, revenue, or valuation data, so I won’t pretend the rally has been fundamentally priced.
209d7ffcfa5787b277981c574fab39b3a47c9e823d146f11c104f27359ae82c58624d818ee7811d0e765aa63f60423eb1e28fec5823b0c3f5024085df84084a2Committed 2026-07-24T10:21:07+00:00 · 100 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-23 · 2026-08-22 · 2026-08-21