UB / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
UB’s +13.0% seven-day surge meets a bullish MA stack, but 68 Greed raises the bar
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-29 03:04 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bullish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Mixed
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-23 — Neutral — +5.9% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Underweight — +7.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — -11.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -16.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Neutral — -25.2% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -17.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -5.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Overweight — -7.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Overweight — -10.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Overweight — -8.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +12.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Overweight — -26.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Overweight — -24.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Overweight — -24.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Overweight — -14.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Overweight — -6.5% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — +6.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Overweight — -8.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +55.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Overweight — +19.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Overweight — +37.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Overweight — +27.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Overweight — +21.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Overweight — +24.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 1 exchanges
Invalidation: A close below $0.13466 overturns the bullish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.13466 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: I’m Mara Frost.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bullish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: I’m Leo Vance, and I’ll concede the sharpest bear number: Fear&Greed is 68 and UB is still 35. Resistance to clear sits near $0.2126. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’m Leo Vance, and I’ll concede the sharpest bear number: Fear&Greed is 68 and UB is still 35.7% below the 60-day high of $0.2126. But the chart has rebuilt its engine—price is above SMA20, SMA50, and SMA200 by 8.9%, 11.9%, and 52.5%, with MACD histogram expanding at +0.001262; that makes the old drawdown stale evidence, not a veto. Our Aug 21 underweight call was a LOSS as UB returned +7.1% versus BTC, so this current breadth of trend evidence deserves a different verdict.
I’m Mara Frost. Leo’s favorite exhibit is the moving-average spread, but those averages describe the rebound after damage; they do not erase the -10.9% 30-day return or the $0.2126 overhead wall. RSI at 56.0 is not explosive, taker buy/sell is only 1.01, and 53.1% of accounts are already long—hardly the clean launchpad Leo is painting. The Aug 21 underweight LOSS at +7.1% versus BTC is an acknowledged miss, not proof that this crowded bounce can reclaim the range high.
· Greed at 68 and 53.1% long accounts
· 30-day return still -10.9%
· $0.2126 resistance remains 35.7% away
Invalidation: A close below $0.13466 overturns the bullish ruling.
Mara, the current close at $0.13666 is holding near the $0.13794 session high while MACD expands; you’re treating a rear-view 30-day loss as if it were live price action.
Leo, the same session high is only $0.13794, still nowhere near $0.2126; a 56.0 RSI and 1.01 taker ratio show momentum without acceleration.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, the current close at $0.13666 is holding near the $0.13794 session high while MACD expands; you’re treating a rear-view 30-day loss as if it were live price action.
Leo, the same session high is only $0.13794, still nowhere near $0.2126; a 56.0 RSI and 1.01 taker ratio show momentum without acceleration.
I’m Theo Okafor. The crowd is not euphoric enough to invalidate the trend: longs are 53.1%, L/S is 1.13, and takers are nearly balanced at 1.01. Funding is absent, so nobody gets to invent a carry-driven squeeze—or a crowded longs collapse.
I’m Dmitri Volkov. Macro confirmation is missing from this pack, and the broad headlines are about XRP and Kalshi, not UB. That leaves the bullish case dependent on its own chart, which is stronger than the news backdrop but still vulnerable beneath $0.13466.
I’m Judge Aldrich: the bullish side wins, decisively on the multi-horizon moving-average structure plus expanding MACD. The recent Aug 21 underweight LOSS (+7.1% versus BTC) differs because today’s pack shows price above SMA20, SMA50, and SMA200 with RSI 56.0, rather than relying on a bearish label against an unconfirmed trend. I overturn this ruling if UB closes below $0.13466.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
I’m Kai Nakamura. Direction: bullish. Evidence families: price above SMA20 (+8.9%), SMA50 (+11.9%), and SMA200 (+52.5%); SMA50 above SMA200 (+36.3%); expanding MACD histogram (+0.001262); RSI 56.0. Conflict: 30-day performance is still -10.9%, while the 60-day high at $0.2126 sits 35.7% above price. Sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
I’m Sofia Reyes. Direction: mildly bearish on crowding. Evidence families: Fear&Greed 68 (Greed), long accounts 53.1%, L/S ratio 1.13, taker buy/sell 1.01. Conflict: buying pressure is only marginal and StockTwits supplied 0 messages, so social confirmation is absent. Sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
I’m Ed Walsh. The coin-specific tape is headline-heavy: TradingView reported an agent-market launch reaction, while AMBCrypto reported a 30% plunge after support failed. The broader headlines on XRP quantum preparation and Kalshi’s court ruling do not provide a direct UB catalyst.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
I’m Priya Anand. The data pack provides no token-supply, valuation, revenue, unlock, or adoption metrics for Unibase. My fundamental read is therefore neutral, with the current verdict resting on price structure and market behavior rather than token economics.
fe3e73ae0128fb0cdb5ea401b31ed597acf9cc2d0e5a4a1059c77856985d3eeaadde2046047c35b2be3d774c5e58080e229d71d404353d96fdaed9f2e1bcf4e2Committed 2026-08-30T00:20:00+00:00 · 91 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-23 · 2026-08-22 · 2026-08-21