UB / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
UB at $0.12006 is still 43.5% below its 60-day high, with greed outrunning demand
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-27 02:51 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Mixed
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-23 — Neutral — +5.9% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Underweight — +7.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — -11.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -16.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Neutral — -25.2% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -17.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -5.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Overweight — -7.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Overweight — -10.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Overweight — -8.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +12.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Overweight — -26.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Overweight — -24.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Overweight — -24.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Overweight — -14.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Overweight — -6.5% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — +6.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Overweight — -8.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +55.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Overweight — +19.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Overweight — +37.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Overweight — +27.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Overweight — +21.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Overweight — +24.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 1 exchanges
Invalidation: A sustained break above $0.12202 with RSI(14) above 50 invalidates the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.11952 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, that 35.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, that 35. Key support to defend sits near $0.11952. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I concede the ugly number: UB is down 11.0% over 30 days and sits 3.8% under SMA20. But the tape hasn’t broken structurally—price is still 35.5% above SMA200, SMA50 leads SMA200 by 35.0%, and the 7-day gain is 6.3%; the recent wobble looks stale rather than fatal.
Leo, that 35.5% SMA200 cushion is exactly the hopium exhibit: it describes a coin that already ran far above its long baseline, not one proving fresh demand. The key number is taker buy/sell at 0.92 alongside RSI 47.4; if buyers were really reclaiming control, short-term momentum wouldn’t be this limp.
· bullish SMA50/SMA200 structure
· MACD downside contraction
· AI-sector sentiment spillover
Invalidation: A sustained break above $0.12202 with RSI(14) above 50 invalidates the bearish ruling.
Leo, you’re leaning on the SMA200 while ignoring that UB is still 43.5% below the 60-day high of $0.2126. A “healthy pullback” that deep needs evidence of demand, and 0.92 taker flow isn’t it.
Mara, the 60-day high is a rear-view mirror, not a verdict. UB is above SMA50 and SMA200, and MACD histogram contraction at -0.0008012 says downside impulse is losing force.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Leo, you’re leaning on the SMA200 while ignoring that UB is still 43.5% below the 60-day high of $0.2126. A “healthy pullback” that deep needs evidence of demand, and 0.92 taker flow isn’t it.
Mara, the 60-day high is a rear-view mirror, not a verdict. UB is above SMA50 and SMA200, and MACD histogram contraction at -0.0008012 says downside impulse is losing force.
I’ll puncture both stories: long accounts are 51.5% and the L/S ratio is 1.06—barely tilted, hardly a crowded directional bet. But takers still favor selling at 0.92, so the flow evidence supports Mara until that ratio turns decisively upward.
Nvidia’s $108 billion revenue guide can lift AI enthusiasm, but it doesn’t repair UB’s chart. With Fear&Greed at 71, macro liquidity optimism is already being charged into the price while UB remains 43.5% beneath its high.
I rule for the bearish side: UB’s decisive exhibit is taker buy/sell at 0.92 paired with RSI(14) at 47.4, showing sellers retain near-term control despite the bullish long-term moving-average structure. The ruling is overturned by a sustained move above the $0.12202 session high with RSI reclaiming 50.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
RSI(14) is 47.4 and MACD histogram remains negative at -0.0008012, while price sits 3.8% below SMA20. Direction: mixed; evidence families: momentum, moving averages, multi-period returns, support/resistance; conflicts: bullish SMA50/SMA200 structure versus weak short-term momentum and a 30-day decline of 11.0%; sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Direction: bearish; evidence families: Fear&Greed, account skew, taker flow; conflicts: long accounts are only 51.5% with an L/S ratio of 1.06, yet Fear&Greed is elevated at 71 and taker buy/sell is weak at 0.92; sufficiency: adequate. StockTwits supplied 0 messages, so it adds no crowd signal.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Ed Walsh: The UB headlines swing from a 15.83% rally toward $0.20 to a 30% plunge after support failed; that is a volatility story, not a durable catalyst. SEC custody-rule news and Nvidia’s $108 billion revenue guide may influence the broader crypto and AI tape, but neither headline directly improves UB’s token-specific case.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
Priya Anand: The data pack provides no token-supply, unlock, revenue, adoption, or valuation metrics for Unibase. The fundamental verdict is therefore unsupported, and the decision rests on price structure and crowd behavior.
814257e9dd5a1813e545845701cb4b6239d923ee0ccf34a9f0d9144a8060863364bb1ee510b85abc06eb9d0328d74bef4839ac43e76e5a63e96f0ad2d0a0301eCommitted 2026-08-28T00:20:00+00:00 · 93 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-23 · 2026-08-22 · 2026-08-21