UB / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
UB’s 10.623% daily surge runs into greed at 73 and a much weaker 0.20 resistance test
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-28 02:40 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bullish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-23 — Neutral — +5.9% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Underweight — +7.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — -11.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -16.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Neutral — -25.2% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -17.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -5.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Overweight — -7.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Overweight — -10.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Overweight — -8.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +12.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Overweight — -26.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Overweight — -24.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Overweight — -24.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Overweight — -14.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Overweight — -6.5% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — +6.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Overweight — -8.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +55.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Overweight — +19.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Overweight — +37.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Overweight — +27.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Overweight — +21.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Overweight — +24.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 1 exchanges
Invalidation: A sustained break above 0.20 overturns the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.12773 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, your 49.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, your 49. Key support to defend sits near $0.12773. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugly number: UB is still 37.2% below the 60-day high at 0.2126. But the tape has already climbed 13.3% in seven days, sits 49.7% above SMA200, and carries an expanding MACD histogram; that’s a live trend, not stale wreckage. Greed at 73 can be fuel when RSI is only 54.5, not proof the engine is overheated.
Leo, your 49.7% SMA200 gap is precisely the problem: you’re calling a stretched rebound fresh discovery while UB remains 37.2% beneath 0.2126. The latest candle’s 10.623% jump reached 0.13433, yet takers still leaned bearish at 0.95. A bullish moving-average stack cannot by itself convert promotional headlines into durable demand.
· bullish MA structure and expanding MACD
· Agent Market narrative momentum
· RSI 54.5 leaves room for continuation
Invalidation: A sustained break above 0.20 overturns the bearish ruling.
Mara, the close at 0.1334 held near the 0.13433 high after opening at 0.12788; buyers didn’t surrender the spike. The +13.3% seven-day move and expanding MACD say continuation has evidence behind it.
Leo, continuation has to clear something first. UB is still 37.2% below 0.2126, and the 0.95 taker ratio says the breakout candle lacked aggressive follow-through.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, the close at 0.1334 held near the 0.13433 high after opening at 0.12788; buyers didn’t surrender the spike. The +13.3% seven-day move and expanding MACD say continuation has evidence behind it.
Leo, continuation has to clear something first. UB is still 37.2% below 0.2126, and the 0.95 taker ratio says the breakout candle lacked aggressive follow-through.
I’m with Mara on the flow read: 50.1% long accounts and an L/S ratio of 1.00 show no directional crowding edge, while 0.95 taker buy/sell tilts against the rally. Funding is absent, so nobody gets to invent a carry signal.
The macro tape offers UB no shelter: the supplied market headlines are about Kalshi litigation and Ethena buybacks, not liquidity flowing into Unibase. A token climbing 10.623% on narrative while still far below its high is exactly the sort of move that fades when attention rotates.
I rule for the bear side: underweight is the stronger call because the decisive exhibit is the 0.95 taker buy/sell ratio against a 10.623% one-day surge, with no funding confirmation and Fear&Greed already at 73. I invalidate this ruling on a sustained break above 0.20, which would show the headline-driven rally has become structural.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Direction: bullish. UB trades at 0.1334, 6.5% above SMA20, 10.4% above SMA50, and 49.7% above SMA200; SMA50 sits 35.6% above SMA200 and MACD histogram is expanding at +0.0004783. RSI 54.5 is constructive, but price remains 37.2% below the 60-day high of 0.2126.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Direction: bearish. Fear&Greed is 73 (Greed), while taker buy/sell is 0.95 and long accounts are only 50.1% with an L/S ratio of 1.00. That is not a stampede, but it leaves the 10.623% daily jump vulnerable to fading rather than confirmation.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Unibase headlines point to an Agent Market launch and AI-ranking enthusiasm, including a reported 15.83% rally toward 0.20 resistance. The broader headlines concern Kalshi litigation and Ethena tokenomics, not a direct UB catalyst; the local story is promotional momentum, not a verified fundamental repricing.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
The data pack supplies no token-supply, revenue, adoption, or valuation figures for Unibase. The Agent Market launch is a narrative catalyst, but without operating metrics the 0.20 target is headline-led rather than fundamental evidence.
c1567b8c36d3e3038e70d5833d038ff42219b1e60d802cc74c4452c447cc28b9b460912c22e647ff99deef7428c2f0098da84f163350ba433a36d11ce82e7419Committed 2026-08-29T00:20:00+00:00 · 98 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-23 · 2026-08-22 · 2026-08-21