UB / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
UB at $0.11906 is still vulnerable after a 11.6% seven-day slide
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-20 02:53 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Mixed
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-23 — Neutral — +5.9% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Underweight — +7.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — -11.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -16.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Neutral — -25.2% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -17.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -5.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Overweight — -7.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Overweight — -10.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Overweight — -8.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +12.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Overweight — -26.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Overweight — -24.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Overweight — -24.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Overweight — -14.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Overweight — -6.5% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — +6.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Overweight — -8.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +55.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Overweight — +19.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Overweight — +37.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Overweight — +27.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Overweight — +21.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Overweight — +24.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 1 exchanges
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is overturned by a daily close above the SMA20 level, which is currently 12.9% above $0.11906, accompanied by RSI above 50.. Cautious read: a break below $0.05762 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo’s 39.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo’s 39. Key support to defend sits near $0.05762. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugly exhibit: UB is down 11.6% over seven days and sits 12.9% beneath SMA20. But RSI at 46.6 isn’t capitulation, MACD is contracting rather than accelerating lower, and the underlying MA stack remains bullish—price is 39.1% above SMA200 with SMA50 35.6% above it. The recent overweight calls lost—August 8 at -7.2%, August 7 at -10.4%, August 6 at -8.1%, and August 4 through August 2 at -26.4%, -24.2%, and -24.2% versus BTC—but that record may reflect chasing a stretched move, not proof that this $0.11906 reset cannot recover.
Leo’s 39.1% above SMA200 is a rear-view mirror, not a floor. The number that matters now is the 12.9% SMA20 deficit alongside a 0.92 taker buy/sell ratio and a 0.261% 24-hour gain that failed to repair the weekly damage. The settled record is brutal for optimism: seven losses in eight calls, including every overweight call from August 2 through August 8, while the lone August 9 underweight call won by 5.6% versus BTC.
I think the bearish case has more room than the ruling admits: UB is still 44.0% below the $0.2126 60-day high, and 7-day performance is -11.6%. The 60-day low at $0.05762 shows how much downside space the structure has already tolerated.
The fastest failure is a rebound through the SMA20 zone: the current price is $0.11906, while the pack does not provide the SMA20’s absolute price. The fragile exhibit is the seller-leaning taker ratio of 0.92, especially because RSI is only 46.6 and MACD is contracting.
Leo overreaches by treating the +39.1% distance above SMA200 as immediate support; Mara overreaches if she assumes the 60-day high gap guarantees continuation. The deciding condition is whether UB reclaims its SMA20, currently 12.9% above price; the settled record favors the bear after 1 WIN and 7 LOSS calls overall.
· bullish SMA50/SMA200 structure
· MACD contraction and rebound risk
· no funding-rate data
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is overturned by a daily close above the SMA20 level, which is currently 12.9% above $0.11906, accompanied by RSI above 50.
Mara, you’re treating the SMA20 gap like a death sentence, but MACD at -0.003712 is contracting and the SMA50/SMA200 spread is +35.6%. That’s a pullback inside a larger uptrend, not a structural collapse.
Leo, a larger uptrend doesn’t pay the bill when the asset is 44.0% below its 60-day high of $0.2126. Your bullish structure has already failed to protect the last six overweight calls.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, you’re treating the SMA20 gap like a death sentence, but MACD at -0.003712 is contracting and the SMA50/SMA200 spread is +35.6%. That’s a pullback inside a larger uptrend, not a structural collapse.
Leo, a larger uptrend doesn’t pay the bill when the asset is 44.0% below its 60-day high of $0.2126. Your bullish structure has already failed to protect the last six overweight calls.
I’m with Mara on the flow tape: only 46.2% of accounts are long, yet takers favor selling at 0.92. With funding unavailable, nobody gets to invent crowded-short fuel or a squeeze catalyst.
And Bitcoin touching $70,000 is not UB liquidity. The pack gives me no macro transmission into this token, while UB’s 7-day loss is already -11.6%.
I rule for the bear: underweight is the winning side, and the decisive exhibit is the combination of UB at $0.11906, 12.9% below SMA20, with taker buy/sell at 0.92. This differs from the recent losing overweight calls because the current call follows demonstrated relative weakness rather than chasing strength; the ruling is invalidated by a daily close above $0.1370 with RSI above 50.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
I see a damaged short-term chart: UB sits 12.9% below SMA20, with RSI at 46.6 and MACD histogram negative at -0.003712. The long-term structure is still constructive—price is 39.1% above SMA200 and SMA50 leads SMA200 by 35.6%—but the immediate tape favors downside.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
I see greed at 62 while only 46.2% of accounts are long and taker flow leans seller-side at 0.92. That is not a euphoric crowd, but it offers no demand shock to reverse the seven-day loss; StockTwits had 0 bullish and 0 bearish messages from 0 posts, so social confirmation is absent.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
I see no material UB-specific catalyst in the pack beyond Bithumb adding UB to Korean-won trading. The remaining headlines are price pages and prediction content, while broader crypto headlines about Bitcoin at $70,000 and HYPE's 11% jump do not establish a UB-specific bid.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
I have no token-supply, revenue, adoption, or valuation data here, so the fundamental case cannot carry the verdict. The available evidence is market-structure driven, with UB at $0.11906 versus a 60-day high of $0.2126.
e8eb13bcf11cb796789f985109634ea53a6d3268d9f790c5dd4bea55e36fb7a43c48fe76cfdb380303016b74f46003f8e487fa46e3f85434b095720b4f300a33Committed 2026-08-21T00:20:00+00:00 · 88 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-23 · 2026-08-22 · 2026-08-21