UB / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
UB’s 46.1 RSI cannot offset a 16.0% SMA20 breakdown and -6.03% daily slide
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-16 02:51 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-23 — Neutral — +5.9% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Underweight — +7.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — -11.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -16.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Neutral — -25.2% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -17.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -5.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Overweight — -7.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Overweight — -10.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Overweight — -8.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +12.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Overweight — -26.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Overweight — -24.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Overweight — -24.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Overweight — -14.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Overweight — -6.5% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — +6.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Overweight — -8.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +55.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Overweight — +19.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Overweight — +37.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Overweight — +27.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Overweight — +21.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Overweight — +24.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 1 exchanges
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated by a sustained reclaim of 0.12169 alongside a MACD histogram that stops expanding negatively.. Cautious read: a break below $0.11824 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, your +42.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, your +42. Key support to defend sits near $0.11824. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugliest number: UB is down 6.03% in 24 hours, 11.5% over seven days, and MACD is worsening. But the tape is still 42.0% above SMA200, SMA50 sits 36.3% above SMA200, and 30-day performance is +31.5%—that’s a pullback inside a larger bullish structure, not a corpse. The 34 Fear&Greed reading also means the headline damage is already visible rather than fresh surprise.
Leo, your +42.0% versus SMA200 is precisely the trap: it measures distance from a lagging baseline while price is already 16.0% below SMA20 and MACD hist is -0.004711 and expanding. The supposed pullback has reached 43.9% below the 60-day high at 0.2126, while the recent record shows overweight calls lost eight straight times, including 2026-08-08 overweight at -7.2% versus BTC and 2026-08-04 overweight at -26.4%.
I’m more bearish than the ruling: a 43.9% gap below the 60-day high of 0.2126 and only 1.01 taker buy/sell leave room for another leg lower if fearful accounts keep leaning long at 52.8%. The expanding -0.004711 MACD histogram says downside momentum is still underpriced.
I’m focused on the fastest failure: the bullish long-term structure could overpower the short-term break. Price remains 42.0% above SMA200 and SMA50 is 36.3% above SMA200, so a recovery through 0.12169 would expose the bearish exhibit as a shallow shakeout.
I think Leo overreached by treating +42.0% versus SMA200 as near-term protection, but Mara overreaches if she ignores that structure entirely. The deciding condition is whether UB holds above 0.11824 and reclaims 0.12036, or instead extends the MACD-led break beneath today’s low.
· bullish SMA50/SMA200 structure
· oversold sentiment at Fear&Greed 34
· product/listing headlines gaining traction
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated by a sustained reclaim of 0.12169 alongside a MACD histogram that stops expanding negatively.
Mara, the recent losses are real: every shown call from 2026-08-01 through 2026-08-08 was overweight and all eight lost. But today’s 0.11922 is still above the 0.05762 60-day low by 106.9%, and the moving-average stack has not broken.
Leo, that 106.9% rebound cushion doesn’t stop a trend failure; it merely says the coin once traded lower. A close below 0.11824 would confirm that today’s weak candle is not just noise, especially with the 7-day loss at 11.5%.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, the recent losses are real: every shown call from 2026-08-01 through 2026-08-08 was overweight and all eight lost. But today’s 0.11922 is still above the 0.05762 60-day low by 106.9%, and the moving-average stack has not broken.
Leo, that 106.9% rebound cushion doesn’t stop a trend failure; it merely says the coin once traded lower. A close below 0.11824 would confirm that today’s weak candle is not just noise, especially with the 7-day loss at 11.5%.
I’m not granting the bulls a positioning flush. Long accounts are 52.8%, L/S is 1.12, and taker buy/sell is 1.01—balanced flow, yes, but not the forced-exit reset that would make the bounce cleaner.
I see no macro rescue in this pack. The Unitree IPO and UBS Bitcoin-options headlines do not establish liquidity for UB, while the coin itself is down 6.03% today and 11.5% this week.
I rule for the bears: underweight. The decisive exhibit is the combination of price 16.0% below SMA20 with an expanding -0.004711 MACD histogram, while the latest eight settled calls were 0 WIN and 8 LOSS. This differs from those losing overweight calls because the current ruling explicitly follows confirmed short-term momentum damage rather than the still-bullish long moving averages; the call is overturned by a sustained move back above 0.12036 with MACD histogram no longer expanding, or more decisively by a reclaim of 0.12169.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
I’m bearish. RSI(14) is 46.1, MACD histogram is -0.004711 and expanding, while price sits 16.0% below SMA20. The +36.3% SMA50/SMA200 structure and price at +42.0% versus SMA200 conflict with the short-term deterioration. Evidence families: momentum, moving averages, trend structure. Conflicts: long-term bullish averages versus weakening short-term momentum. Sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
I’m bearish. Fear&Greed is 34, but long accounts still lead at 52.8% with an L/S ratio of 1.12, while taker buy/sell is only 1.01. That is fearful sentiment without a clean capitulation signal, and 0 of 0 StockTwits messages adds no usable crowd confirmation. Evidence families: account positioning, taker flow, fear gauge. Conflicts: fear reading versus mildly long-skewed accounts. Sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
I’m bearish on the news mix. Bithumb’s UB/KRW listing and the Agent Market launch headline are constructive, but the pack supplies no quantified adoption, revenue, or liquidity impact. The broader headlines about Unitree and UBS are unrelated to UB’s immediate earnings power.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
I’m neutral-to-bearish fundamentally. The data pack offers listing and product-launch headlines, but no token supply, unlock, valuation, usage, or revenue figures to support a durable fundamental rerating. A 60-day drawdown of 43.9% from 0.2126 reinforces that the market has not yet validated the narrative.
5b1042ac090ff005d719422ab5c656496727abf48e29fbfdbfd6976f86548d84eaff5f24ed3adac83e409d856a55f50f8d212bab4f7befa37a3192bd7340acc9Committed 2026-08-17T00:20:00+00:00 · 89 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-23 · 2026-08-22 · 2026-08-21