STX / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
STX’s 80 RSI and 86.6% seven-day surge look stretched beneath 0.2447 resistance
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-24 01:19 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Mixed
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Shorts pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — +8.0% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — +8.7% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — +77.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — +50.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -2.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -5.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — -3.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -4.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -6.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — -4.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -6.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -8.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -8.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -8.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -3.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +3.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — +3.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -1.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -13.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -17.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -14.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -17.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -12.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -16.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -3.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Underweight — -1.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: A decisive close above 0.2447 overturns the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.2233 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo’s +0.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo’s +0. Key support to defend sits near $0.2233. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the sharpest bear number: RSI is 80.0 after a blistering 86.6% seven-day run. But that heat is already visible in the tape, and momentum is still widening with MACD histogram at +0.01363; STX is pressing only 7.8% below the 0.2447 60-day high. My recent underweight calls on August 9, 8, and 7 were wins, but August 16’s underweight call lost as STX returned +50.1% versus BTC—that loss proves this coin can punish stale bearishness.
Leo’s +0.01363 MACD is the exact kind of shiny exhibit that keeps short-sellers employed. Price is 55.0% above SMA20 and 48.6% above SMA50, yet the SMA50 is 27.5% below SMA200; that is not a clean trend, it is a vertical rebound colliding with structural damage. The August 16 underweight loss at +50.1% versus BTC is a real warning, but it does not erase today’s 80.0 RSI, 73 greed reading, or the fact that STX remains 7.8% under resistance after a parabolic move.
I think the bullish thesis has more room than the ruling admits: MACD histogram is expanding at +0.01363, and a move through 0.2447 would extend a trend already up 86.6% in seven days. The August 16 underweight loss, when STX gained 50.1% versus BTC, shows how badly momentum can outrun a valuation-style bear case.
The fastest failure is a rollover from the 80.0 RSI zone before resistance breaks. The fragile exhibit is MACD expansion: despite +0.01363, price is still 55.0% above SMA20 and sentiment sits at Greed 73, leaving a crowded emotional bid vulnerable to mean reversion.
The bear side overreached by treating absent funding data as proof of crowding; Theo’s hard evidence is only 51.7% long accounts and a 1.00 taker ratio. The deciding condition is price: acceptance above 0.2447 favors the bull, while rejection followed by a break under 0.2233 validates the bear.
· MACD expansion at +0.01363
· Momentum continuation after the August 16 underweight loss
· Funding rate unavailable
Invalidation: A decisive close above 0.2447 overturns the bearish ruling.
Mara, you’re treating the 27.5% SMA50-versus-SMA200 gap like a brick wall; price has already climbed 65.3% in 30 days through it. A bearish average can lag a live breakout.
Leo, lag is precisely why I’m citing the faster structure: 55.0% above SMA20 with RSI 80.0. Your breakout story needs a clean breach of 0.2447, not applause for a candle still below it.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, you’re treating the 27.5% SMA50-versus-SMA200 gap like a brick wall; price has already climbed 65.3% in 30 days through it. A bearish average can lag a live breakout.
Leo, lag is precisely why I’m citing the faster structure: 55.0% above SMA20 with RSI 80.0. Your breakout story needs a clean breach of 0.2447, not applause for a candle still below it.
I’ll puncture both narratives: long accounts are only 51.7%, L/S is 1.07, and taker buy/sell is 1.00. There is no confirmed funding-rate excess, because funding is unavailable, so neither side gets to invent crowded longs.
The macro tape is thin evidence for STX: regulation headlines are broad, while the Treasury-buyback story is about XRP. Without a direct liquidity catalyst, a 65.3% monthly climb has little headline fuel left.
I rule for the bear thesis—underweight. The decisive exhibit is the collision of RSI(14) 80.0 with price 55.0% above SMA20 while still 7.8% below the 0.2447 60-day high; that is stretched momentum under nearby supply. This call is different from the August 16 underweight loss at +50.1% versus BTC because the current pack explicitly shows overbought RSI, greed at 73, and a bearish SMA50/SMA200 structure. I overturn the ruling on a decisive close above 0.2447.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Kai Nakamura: Bearish. RSI(14) is 80.0, while price sits 55.0% above SMA20 and 48.6% above SMA50. MACD histogram is expanding at +0.01363, but the SMA50 remains 27.5% below SMA200; evidence families are momentum, moving averages, and support/resistance; conflicts are expanding MACD versus bearish long-term MA structure; sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Sofia Reyes: Bearish. Fear&Greed is 73, long accounts lead at 51.7%, and the L/S ratio is 1.07, while taker flow is balanced at 1.00. The crowd is mildly greedy rather than capitulating; evidence families are sentiment, account skew, and taker flow; conflicts are balanced taker flow versus bullish StockTwits tags at 2 versus 0; sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Ed Walsh: Neutral. Blockstack coverage frames Stacks as a Bitcoin smart-contract layer and emphasizes a decentralized future, but the broader headlines offer no STX-specific catalyst. XRP’s Treasury-buyback story and general crypto-regulation coverage do not establish a direct earnings or adoption impulse for STX.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
Priya Anand: Neutral. The data pack supports the narrative of Stacks as Bitcoin’s smart-contract layer, but supplies no token-supply, fee, revenue, or usage metrics. Fundamental conviction is therefore narrative-led, not measurable.
04d6300984ea199edc81a194db1a8f0873731557a28e69f9f644cf422bc0e91e00f6f5bb5b065969cc8e7a7da551e81002c3c601fccb1b62d647adc3d619d114Committed 2026-08-25T00:20:00+00:00 · 87 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-23