STX / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
STX is stretched at RSI 80.2 after a 90.8% 30-day surge
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-28 01:05 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Mixed
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Neutral
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Shorts pay
D
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — +8.0% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — +8.7% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — +77.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — +50.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -2.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -5.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — -3.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -4.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -6.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — -4.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -6.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -8.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -8.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -8.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -3.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +3.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — +3.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -1.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -13.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -17.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -14.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -17.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -12.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -16.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -3.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Underweight — -1.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: A decisive move above 0.2893 would invalidate the neutral ruling in favor of bullish continuation; a loss of 0.2526 would invalidate it in favor of bearish breakdown.. Cautious read: a break below $0.2526 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, you’re calling an overheated radiator a growth engine because price has outrun its averages.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Mixed, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, you’re calling an overheated radiator a growth engine because price has outrun its averages. Key support to defend sits near $0.2526. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugly number first: RSI is 80.2 and MACD histogram has contracted to +0.0134. But after a 90.8% 30-day run, that is stale heat in the radiator, not proof the engine has seized; STX is still 49.9% above SMA20 and 35.5% higher in seven days. Our last two underweight calls, on August 20 and August 16, lost as STX returned 77.1% and 50.1% versus BTC—this tape has already punished reflexive fading.
Leo, you’re calling an overheated radiator a growth engine because price has outrun its averages. RSI 80.2, a contracting MACD histogram, and an 11.1% gap below the 60-day high at 0.2893 say the move is losing thrust near resistance, while SMA50 sits 23.9% below SMA200. The August 20 and August 16 underweight losses are facts, not evidence that today’s overextension must keep paying.
· RSI 80.2 momentum reversal
· contracting MACD at +0.0134
· bearish SMA50/SMA200 structure
Invalidation: A decisive move above 0.2893 would invalidate the neutral ruling in favor of bullish continuation; a loss of 0.2526 would invalidate it in favor of bearish breakdown.
Mara, the decisive contrast is the account data: only 45.1% are long and the L/S ratio is 0.82. A crowded-long collapse needs a crowd; this one is not wearing matching jerseys.
Leo, greed is still 73 and the seven-day gain is 35.5%. Thin long-account participation doesn’t erase a price structure that can unwind from 0.2576 back toward the 60-day range.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, the decisive contrast is the account data: only 45.1% are long and the L/S ratio is 0.82. A crowded-long collapse needs a crowd; this one is not wearing matching jerseys.
Leo, greed is still 73 and the seven-day gain is 35.5%. Thin long-account participation doesn’t erase a price structure that can unwind from 0.2576 back toward the 60-day range.
I’m with Leo on one narrow point: taker buy/sell at 0.97 is not aggressive chasing, and the account ratio at 0.82 does not show classic upside crowding. But I can’t confirm funding support because funding data is absent.
I’m with Mara on regime risk: the pack gives me no liquidity catalyst, while the headline flow is about Kalshi litigation and Ethena. Without a macro impulse, a 90.8% monthly jump is carrying its own gasoline.
I rule neutral, with the bearish and bullish exhibits pulling in opposite directions. The decisive exhibit is the collision between RSI 80.2 and a contracting +0.0134 MACD histogram on one side, and the non-crowded 0.82 L/S ratio with 45.1% longs on the other. This call turns bullish only if STX reclaims 0.2893; it turns bearish if price loses 0.2526 while momentum continues to deteriorate.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
I see a violently extended tape: STX sits 49.9% above SMA20 and 61.5% above SMA50, while RSI(14) is 80.2. The catch is structural: SMA50 remains 23.9% below SMA200 and MACD histogram is contracting at +0.0134. Direction: mixed; evidence families: trend extension, momentum, moving-average structure; conflicts: strong price momentum versus bearish MA alignment and fading MACD; sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
I read greed at 73, but the crowd isn’t uniformly chasing: only 45.1% of accounts are long, the L/S ratio is 0.82, and taker buy/sell is 0.97. That’s less euphoric than the price move, though the 35.5% seven-day gain still leaves sentiment vulnerable to a flush. Direction: neutral; evidence families: Fear&Greed, account positioning, taker flow; conflicts: greed reading versus net-short account skew and sub-1.00 taker ratio; sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
I find a constructive Stacks narrative in the Fortune, Motley Fool, Coin Bureau, and Crypto.com coverage, but no fresh STX-specific catalyst in the market headlines. The prominent external stories concern Kalshi litigation and Ethena’s buyback and unlock changes, so the news tape offers no clean reason to extend this rally. Direction: neutral.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
I see a credible long-term story around Stacks as a Bitcoin smart-contract layer, reflected in the coverage describing a decentralized future and Bitcoin-linked utility. But the pack supplies no token-supply, revenue, adoption, or valuation figures, so fundamentals cannot justify the 90.8% monthly repricing on their own.
99bfdea7a7c5e4ba0c5b8cc813666387b688a5898e9f987c96f1bdd201d7487db460912c22e647ff99deef7428c2f0098da84f163350ba433a36d11ce82e7419Committed 2026-08-29T00:20:00+00:00 · 98 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23