STX / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
STX’s 73.7% monthly surge meets a 71.2 RSI and contracting momentum
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-29 01:22 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Shorts pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — +8.0% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — +8.7% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — +77.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — +50.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -2.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -5.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — -3.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -4.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -6.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — -4.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -6.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -8.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -8.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -8.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -3.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +3.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — +3.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -1.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -13.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -17.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -14.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -17.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -12.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -16.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -3.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Underweight — -1.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: A sustained move above 0.2893 with RSI(14) below 70 invalidates the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.1175 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, your 16.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, your 16. Key support to defend sits near $0.1175. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugly number: RSI is 71.2 and MACD momentum is contracting after a 73.7% monthly sprint. But that’s a hot engine, not a dead one; STX still sits 16.3% above SMA200 and has gained 10.9% in seven days. The recent underweight calls on August 20 and August 16 both lost as STX beat BTC by 77.1% and 50.1%, so fading this tape has already been a costly reflex.
Leo, your 16.3% above SMA200 is the weakest defense on the board—it says only that the rebound is extended, not that it can continue. Price is 37.2% above SMA20 and 51.4% above SMA50 while MACD hist has slipped into contraction; those are exhaustion figures, not a clean trend confirmation. The August 20 and August 16 underweight losses are facts, but they do not erase today’s overextension.
· Momentum breakout above 0.2893
· RSI remaining overbought during continuation
· No funding-rate data
Invalidation: A sustained move above 0.2893 with RSI(14) below 70 invalidates the bearish ruling.
Mara, the 60-day high is 0.2893, still 15.9% above 0.2438; a pullback can happen without breaking the structure. Calling exhaustion before price loses 0.2000 is selling the candle’s shadow.
Leo, 0.2000 is an invented line—there is no such key level in the pack. The actual exhibit is 0.2438 after a 7.09% daily drop, with RSI still 71.2: downside is already arriving while the oscillator remains overheated.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, the 60-day high is 0.2893, still 15.9% above 0.2438; a pullback can happen without breaking the structure. Calling exhaustion before price loses 0.2000 is selling the candle’s shadow.
Leo, 0.2000 is an invented line—there is no such key level in the pack. The actual exhibit is 0.2438 after a 7.09% daily drop, with RSI still 71.2: downside is already arriving while the oscillator remains overheated.
I’m with Mara on the crowd read: taker buy/sell is 0.98 and long accounts are 46.3%, so aggressive demand isn’t dominating. That also means this is not a classic long-crowding collapse; the bearish edge comes from price structure, not funding, which is unavailable.
The macro headlines offer STX no rescue catalyst, while the chart has outrun its averages. A 73.7% 30-day gain leaves liquidity-sensitive assets vulnerable when momentum stops accelerating.
I rule for the bear side: underweight is warranted because the decisive exhibit is the combination of RSI 71.2 with MACD histogram contraction after a 73.7% monthly rise. This call differs from the August 20 and August 16 underweight losses—those records show the danger of reflexive fading, but the current pack uniquely shows a 7.09% one-day reversal, explicit momentum contraction, and price stretched 37.2% above SMA20. My ruling is invalidated by a sustained move above 0.2893 with RSI cooling below 70.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Direction: bearish. RSI(14) is 71.2, price sits 37.2% above SMA20 and 51.4% above SMA50, while MACD histogram at +0.01072 is contracting and SMA50 remains 23.2% below SMA200. Conflicts: the price is still 16.3% above SMA200 and up 10.9% over seven days. Sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Direction: bearish. Fear&Greed is 68 (Greed), taker buy/sell is 0.98, and long accounts are only 46.3% with an L/S ratio of 0.86—more distribution than euphoric chasing. Conflicts: the tiny StockTwits sample is 1 bullish versus 0 bearish. Sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
The STX-specific headlines emphasize decentralized infrastructure and Bitcoin smart-contract relevance, but they provide no fresh catalyst that explains the recent 73.7% monthly repricing. Broader headlines on Kalshi and Solana do not materially improve STX’s near-term setup.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
Stacks’ Bitcoin-linked smart-contract narrative remains the fundamental attraction, echoed by the coverage describing it as Bitcoin’s leading smart-contract layer. The data pack supplies no token-economics, adoption, revenue, or unlock figures to justify extending a vertical move from 0.1175 to 0.2893.
a61228384dedb02d54340887ef4166e4abcd120e27cd90084770b388b6ee07b5adde2046047c35b2be3d774c5e58080e229d71d404353d96fdaed9f2e1bcf4e2Committed 2026-08-30T00:20:00+00:00 · 91 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23