STX / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
STX is pinned near $0.1201 support with RSI at 29.6, but the broader tape still points lower
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-16 01:10 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — +8.0% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — +8.7% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — +77.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — +50.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -2.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -5.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — -3.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -4.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -6.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — -4.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -6.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -8.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -8.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -8.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -3.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +3.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — +3.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -1.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -13.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -17.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -14.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -17.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -12.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -16.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -3.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Underweight — -1.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated by a sustained move above $0.1222 that then reclaims SMA20.. Cautious read: a break below $0.1201 voids this research. Confidence High — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, your snapback thesis hangs on the smallest exhibit while ignoring the price map.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, your snapback thesis hangs on the smallest exhibit while ignoring the price map. Key support to defend sits near $0.1201. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugly headline: STX sits 43.0% below its SMA200 and has dropped 26.1% in 30 days. But RSI at 29.6 is already in oversold territory, while the MACD histogram has turned positive and is expanding at +0.0001052; that’s the kindling for a snapback, especially with price only 1.3% above the $0.1201 60-day low.
Leo, your snapback thesis hangs on the smallest exhibit while ignoring the price map. A positive MACD histogram has not stopped STX from trading 7.4% below SMA20, 19.4% below SMA50, and 43.0% below SMA200; $0.1201 is not a springboard until the market proves it can hold it.
I see more downside than the ruling admits: STX is 43.0% below SMA200, down 26.1% over 30 days, and still has 53.5% of accounts long. The fragile $0.1201 floor could give way before oversold RSI produces anything more than noise.
The fastest failure is a reflex rebound from RSI 29.6. The most fragile exhibit is the bearish trend extrapolation, because MACD has already flipped positive and is expanding at +0.0001052 while price is just 1.3% above the 60-day low.
Leo overreaches by treating one MACD reading as a reversal, while Mara overreaches if she assumes $0.1201 breaks without confirmation. The deciding condition is whether STX holds $0.1201; below it favors the bear, while a reclaim of SMA20 would force the call to be revisited. The prior record supports the bearish discipline: eight shown underweight calls resolved as wins, with 0 losses.
· Oversold RSI rebound
· Positive expanding MACD histogram
· $0.1201 support holds
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated by a sustained move above $0.1222 that then reclaims SMA20.
Leo, RSI at 29.6 describes damage, not a reversal. Where is the evidence that the $0.1201 low is support rather than the next waypoint lower?
Mara, the positive and expanding MACD histogram is the evidence of momentum improving at the margin. A 1.3% cushion above the 60-day low gives a defined rebound zone, even if the larger trend is battered.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Leo, RSI at 29.6 describes damage, not a reversal. Where is the evidence that the $0.1201 low is support rather than the next waypoint lower?
Mara, the positive and expanding MACD histogram is the evidence of momentum improving at the margin. A 1.3% cushion above the 60-day low gives a defined rebound zone, even if the larger trend is battered.
Leo, the crowd isn’t capitulating cleanly: 53.5% of accounts are long, the L/S ratio is 1.15, and taker buy/sell is 1.05. That mild long bias can absorb a bounce, but it also leaves demand vulnerable if $0.1201 breaks.
Mara has the regime right. Fear & Greed at 34 and STX down 6.2% over seven days show liquidity is not rewarding weak assets; the UBS Bitcoin-options headline is not a verified STX impulse.
I rule for the bearish side: STX's bearish moving-average structure is the decisive exhibit, with price 43.0% below SMA200 and SMA50 sitting 29.3% below SMA200. The ruling is overturned by a sustained break above the $0.1218 current-price area that also reclaims SMA20, or by a decisive break below $0.1201 confirming support failure.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Direction: bearish. Evidence families: RSI(14) 29.6; price 7.4% below SMA20, 19.4% below SMA50, and 43.0% below SMA200; bearish SMA50/SMA200 spread of -29.3%; 60d low at $0.1201. Conflicts: MACD histogram is positive and expanding at +0.0001052, suggesting a possible short rebound. Sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Direction: bearish. Evidence families: Fear & Greed at 34; 53.5% of long accounts and L/S ratio 1.15; taker buy/sell at 1.05. Conflicts: mild net-long account skew and slightly positive taker flow can fuel a bounce; StockTwits supplied 0 messages, so social breadth is absent. Sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
The headline set is mostly educational STX coverage, while broader market news highlights Unitree's IPO speculation and UBS's 24-fold surge in Bitcoin ETF call options. Neither item supplies a direct STX catalyst, so the news tape does not offset the coin's weak price structure.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
Stacks is presented in the supplied coverage as Bitcoin's smart-contract layer, but the data pack provides no token-economics, adoption, revenue, or valuation figures. The fundamental case is therefore unquantified here, and it cannot outweigh the documented 30-day decline of 26.1%.
c7d98b42521ff8eaffe0ce446f81ac4b37373687ed332055cd8d24a4931673dfeaff5f24ed3adac83e409d856a55f50f8d212bab4f7befa37a3192bd7340acc9Committed 2026-08-17T00:20:00+00:00 · 89 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23