APE / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
APE’s 71 Greed reading meets a fragile rebound: downside still leads
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-27 01:57 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Mixed
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -8.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Underweight — -0.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Overweight — -3.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -3.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -5.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -4.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — -4.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -9.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — -0.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -2.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -1.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -5.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — +2.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -14.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Overweight — -11.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Neutral — -6.2% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -8.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Overweight — -9.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Neutral — -0.8% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Neutral — +4.7% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Neutral — +5.5% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — +0.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Neutral — -0.4% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Neutral — -3.1% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Neutral — -6.4% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -0.7% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is overturned if APE sustains above 0.1704 or taker buy/sell rises above 1.00 while MACD histogram expands.. Cautious read: a break below $0.1201 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, that 11.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, that 11. Key support to defend sits near $0.1201. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugly number: APE is down 7.7% over 30 days and today’s close slipped 0.917%. But price still rides 11.3% above SMA200, SMA50 is 10.6% above SMA200, and the 6.6% seven-day rebound says the pullback may be stale damage rather than fresh breakdown.
Leo, that 11.3% SMA200 cushion is exactly the trap: it measures distance from an old average, not current demand. The decisive tape says taker buy/sell is 0.89, MACD is contracting, and APE remains 17.5% below the 60-day high at 0.1704; your rebound argument is leaning on lagging structure while liquidity fades.
· bullish moving-average structure
· short-covering squeeze
· unavailable funding data
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is overturned if APE sustains above 0.1704 or taker buy/sell rises above 1.00 while MACD histogram expands.
Mara, RSI at 55.0 isn’t exhaustion; it leaves room before momentum becomes overheated. The 0.1201 60-day low is still 17.0% below price, so the chart has an actual base beneath it.
Leo, Fear&Greed at 71 and 61.0% long accounts mean the crowd already believes the base story. A 0.89 taker ratio says that belief isn’t being reinforced by aggressive flow.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, RSI at 55.0 isn’t exhaustion; it leaves room before momentum becomes overheated. The 0.1201 60-day low is still 17.0% below price, so the chart has an actual base beneath it.
Leo, Fear&Greed at 71 and 61.0% long accounts mean the crowd already believes the base story. A 0.89 taker ratio says that belief isn’t being reinforced by aggressive flow.
I’m with Mara on the flow arithmetic: the 1.56 L/S ratio is long-heavy, while funding is unavailable, so no funding premium can rescue the bullish case. Crowding plus sub-1.00 taker flow is a poor recipe for extending a bounce.
The macro headlines offer no APE-specific liquidity impulse. Nvidia’s guidance may lift risk appetite, but the SEC custody-rule story is policy noise, and APE’s -7.7% 30-day record still reflects a market that hasn’t embraced this token.
I rule bearish, driven by the 0.89 taker buy/sell ratio against 71 Greed and 61.0% long accounts. The bullish moving-average structure is secondary while demand flow is below parity. This ruling is invalidated by a sustained move above the 60-day high of 0.1704 or taker buy/sell recovering above 1.00 with momentum expansion.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
I see a bullish medium-term structure: price is 5.8% above SMA20, 0.6% above SMA50, 11.3% above SMA200, and SMA50 sits 10.6% above SMA200. But MACD histogram is contracting, RSI is only 55.0, and the 30-day return is -7.7% after a 7-day bounce of 6.6%. Direction: mixed; evidence families: moving averages, RSI, MACD, multi-horizon returns, support/resistance; conflicts: bullish moving-average structure versus contracting momentum and negative 30-day performance; sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
I read a crowded, greedy tape: Fear&Greed is 71 and long accounts are 61.0%, with an L/S ratio of 1.56. Taker buy/sell at 0.89 points to weaker aggressive demand, while StockTwits offers almost no usable sample with 0 bullish and 0 bearish tags from 1 message. Direction: bearish; evidence families: Fear&Greed, account skew, L/S ratio, taker flow, social sample; conflicts: greed and long skew versus sub-1.00 taker flow; sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
I find headline-driven history rather than a durable catalyst: the pack highlights prior 80%- and 82%-surge stories, plus a fast pullback and a 5x bet. The SEC custody-rule headline and Nvidia’s earnings beat are broad-market context, not APE-specific demand. I treat the news backdrop as bearish for conviction because spectacular prior moves are being recycled without a fresh fundamental trigger.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
I have no fresh token-economics, supply, unlock, revenue, or governance figures in the pack. The only fundamental signal is that APE remains NFT-linked in the cited coverage, while the reported 80%-82% historical surges show volatility rather than durable value creation. My fundamental read is neutral-to-bearish, with evidence limited to narrative context.
790355e5aa7f0c5ad2d9e685369d1ebf3b608abe4b4cdfacdfa4944ccd95b44564bb1ee510b85abc06eb9d0328d74bef4839ac43e76e5a63e96f0ad2d0a0301eCommitted 2026-08-28T00:20:00+00:00 · 93 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23 · 2026-08-22