APE / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
APE’s 73 Greed reading meets a 15.1% retreat from the 60-day high
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-24 02:12 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Mixed
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -8.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Underweight — -0.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Overweight — -3.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -3.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -5.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -4.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — -4.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -9.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — -0.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -2.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -1.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -5.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — +2.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -14.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Overweight — -11.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Neutral — -6.2% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -8.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Overweight — -9.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Neutral — -0.8% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Neutral — +4.7% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Neutral — +5.5% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — +0.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Neutral — -0.4% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Neutral — -3.1% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Neutral — -6.4% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -0.7% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is overturned by a decisive reclaim of 0.1704, especially with RSI above 70 and renewed MACD expansion.. Cautious read: a break below $0.1201 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, that 9.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, that 9. Key support to defend sits near $0.1201. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede Mara’s strongest number: Greed is 73 and APE is still 15.1% beneath 0.1704. But that pullback is a stale scar, not a death sentence—price remains above SMA20, SMA50, and SMA200 by 9.7%, 3.3%, and 14.7%, while the 60.9 RSI still has room before outright exhaustion. The bull case says the chart’s engine is running; the question is whether the crowd has already paid for the fuel.
Leo, that 9.7% SMA20 premium is exactly the number that makes your engine vulnerable: APE sprinted 16.4% in seven days and then printed a contracting +0.00309 MACD histogram. The 0.1704 high is not a stale scar when price is 15.1% below it after a blowout move; it is the overhead evidence that momentum failed to hold. Add 58.8% long accounts and taker flow below parity at 0.94, and the “room to run” story looks like hopium wearing a moving-average costume.
I think the bearish call leaves too much upside on the table: price is 14.7% above SMA200, SMA50 is 11.0% above SMA200, and the 60-day low at 0.1201 sits 20.4% below. If APE reclaims 0.1704, the 16.4% seven-day burst could prove to be the first leg of a larger repricing.
The fastest failure is a deeper unwind from the 73 Greed reading: long accounts are 58.8%, L/S is 1.43, and taker buy/sell is already 0.94. The fragile exhibit is the bullish moving-average stack, because a momentum break can turn that 9.7% SMA20 premium into forced de-risking.
Leo overreaches by treating moving averages as proof of continuation; Mara overreaches only if she treats the missing funding data as confirmed crowd excess. The deciding condition is whether APE reclaims 0.1704 or instead breaks below the latest 0.1438 low.
· Bullish moving-average structure
· Speculative NFT-linked volume surge
· Funding data unavailable
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is overturned by a decisive reclaim of 0.1704, especially with RSI above 70 and renewed MACD expansion.
Mara, you’re treating 0.94 taker buy/sell as a verdict, but price is still 14.7% above SMA200 and SMA50 sits 11.0% above SMA200. That’s structure, not costume.
Leo, structure doesn’t erase the tape: 30-day performance is only +0.6% despite the seven-day +16.4% burst. APE is struggling to convert fireworks into trend.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, you’re treating 0.94 taker buy/sell as a verdict, but price is still 14.7% above SMA200 and SMA50 sits 11.0% above SMA200. That’s structure, not costume.
Leo, structure doesn’t erase the tape: 30-day performance is only +0.6% despite the seven-day +16.4% burst. APE is struggling to convert fireworks into trend.
Leo, Mara, the crowd is plainly tilted: 58.8% long accounts and a 1.43 L/S ratio, with Greed at 73. Without funding data I can’t call the crowd maximally expensive, but taker buy/sell at 0.94 says buyers aren’t pressing the advantage.
Theo’s distinction matters. The broader headlines mention crypto regulation and XRP’s Treasury-buyback hopes, not APE; there is no macro liquidity exhibit here rescuing a speculative token after a failed 0.1704 test.
I rule for the bear side: APE’s crowding and failed momentum outweigh the bullish moving-average stack. The decisive exhibit is taker buy/sell at 0.94 alongside 58.8% long accounts and Greed at 73, while the shown record supports this stance with 5 WIN and 0 LOSS directional underweight calls. My ruling is invalidated by a decisive move back above the 0.1704 60-day high or a clear RSI break above 70 with expanding momentum.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
RSI sits at 60.9, while price is above SMA20 by 9.7%, SMA50 by 3.3%, and SMA200 by 14.7%; the moving-average structure is bullish. But MACD histogram is contracting at +0.00309, and APE remains 15.1% below the 0.1704 60-day high after a 16.4% seven-day jump.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Crowd psychology is hot: Fear&Greed is 73, long accounts are 58.8% with an L/S ratio of 1.43, and StockTwits shows 2 bullish tags versus 0 bearish. Yet taker buy/sell is only 0.94, so enthusiasm is outrunning aggressive demand.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
APE headlines celebrate an 82% one-day surge, $866M in daily volume, and an alleged 5x bet, while another report flags insider-trading attention. That is momentum-fuelled spectacle, not a clean fundamental catalyst; the broader market headlines offer no APE-specific support.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
The data pack provides no fresh token-economics, adoption, revenue, or supply evidence to justify the rally. The available narrative is NFT-linked speculation, with price up 16.4% over seven days but only 0.6% over 30 days.
7b327dd1db1db68b5008c3957ce05998c9f88f15a863f8995c91fff9152f318600f6f5bb5b065969cc8e7a7da551e81002c3c601fccb1b62d647adc3d619d114Committed 2026-08-25T00:20:00+00:00 · 87 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-23 · 2026-08-22