APE / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
APE at $0.13738 faces crowded greed and a weak -3.79% day
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-29 02:09 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -8.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Underweight — -0.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Overweight — -3.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -3.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -5.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -4.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — -4.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -9.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — -0.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -2.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -1.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -5.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — +2.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -14.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Overweight — -11.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Neutral — -6.2% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -8.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Overweight — -9.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Neutral — -0.8% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Neutral — +4.7% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Neutral — +5.5% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — +0.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Neutral — -0.4% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Neutral — -3.1% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Neutral — -6.4% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -0.7% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is overturned if APE sustains above $0.1704 or taker buy/sell rises above 1.00 while momentum improves.. Cautious read: a break below $0.1201 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, your $0.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, your $0. Key support to defend sits near $0.1201. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I concede the ugly number: APE is down 3.7888% in 24 hours and 5.9% over seven days. But the tape is not structurally broken—price remains 8.7% above SMA200, SMA50 is 9.7% above SMA200, and the 60-day low at $0.1201 is still 14.4% below spot. I was wrong on August 20 with an overweight call that lost 3.6% versus BTC, but today’s higher-timeframe MA structure gives the rebound a sturdier floor than that losing setup had.
Leo, your $0.1201 floor is a distant postcard, not support being defended today. The decisive evidence is the combination of 60.9% long accounts, Fear&Greed at 68, taker buy/sell at 0.81, and a contracting MACD histogram: crowded optimism is meeting actual selling. The August 20 overweight call lost 3.6% versus BTC, and this current crowding recreates the same kind of downside exposure rather than proving the loss was stale.
· bullish moving-average structure
· short squeeze from crowded longs
· no funding-rate confirmation
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is overturned if APE sustains above $0.1704 or taker buy/sell rises above 1.00 while momentum improves.
Mara, the 60-day low is still 14.4% away, while APE is above SMA200 by 8.7%; that is a trend with bruises, not a collapse.
Leo, trend labels do not absorb supply when taker buy/sell is 0.81 and spot sits 19.4% below the $0.1704 high. Your bullish MA exhibit is lagging the damage.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(5)
Mara, the 60-day low is still 14.4% away, while APE is above SMA200 by 8.7%; that is a trend with bruises, not a collapse.
Leo, trend labels do not absorb supply when taker buy/sell is 0.81 and spot sits 19.4% below the $0.1704 high. Your bullish MA exhibit is lagging the damage.
I’m with Mara on flow: 60.9% long accounts and a 1.56 L/S ratio show directional crowding, while taker flow favors sellers. Funding is absent, so I won’t invent a carry signal.
Theo, crowding can unwind without reaching the $0.1201 low; RSI at 50.8 is neutral, not panic, and 30-day performance is still +3.0%.
Leo, neutral RSI is no liquidity bid. With APE down 5.9% in seven days and no fresh APE catalyst, the market has little macro fuel to challenge the sellers.
I rule for the bears: underweight is the winning side, and the decisive exhibit is the 60.9% long-account skew paired with a 0.81 taker buy/sell ratio. This call differs from the August 20 overweight loss of 3.6% versus BTC because current evidence explicitly shows crowded longs facing net taker selling, while the pack supplies no funding confirmation to support a bullish squeeze. The ruling is invalidated by a sustained move above the 60-day high at $0.1704 or a taker buy/sell ratio reclaiming 1.00 alongside improving momentum.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
I see a conflicted but weakening structure: price is 8.7% above SMA200 and SMA50 sits 9.7% above SMA200, yet price is 0.9% below SMA50, the MACD histogram is contracting at +0.0009562, and the 7-day return is -5.9%. Direction: bearish. Evidence families: moving averages, momentum, multi-horizon returns, support/resistance. Conflicts: bullish long-term MA structure versus fading MACD and short-term weakness. Sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
I read greed with a tilt toward disappointment: Fear&Greed is 68, long accounts are 60.9% with an L/S ratio of 1.56, while taker buy/sell is only 0.81. Direction: bearish. Evidence families: fear/greed, account positioning, taker flow. Conflicts: bullish account skew versus net taker selling. Sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
I find no fresh APE-specific catalyst in the market headlines; the listed APE coverage centers on its prior 80% rally, insider-trading attention, and a fast pullback. The current tape is therefore being driven more by price structure and crowd behavior than by a new fundamental headline.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
I have no token-supply, revenue, adoption, governance, or valuation figures in this pack to support a fundamental rerating. The available evidence is overwhelmingly market-technical, so fundamentals cannot rescue the near-term verdict.
a49447e49171e6bb374a6ab5121b5721fc767f4025dfa2cb9bcf9ae4ab7e836badde2046047c35b2be3d774c5e58080e229d71d404353d96fdaed9f2e1bcf4e2Committed 2026-08-30T00:20:00+00:00 · 91 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23 · 2026-08-22