APE / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
APE at $0.1347 sits above SMA200 by 6.4%, but 7-day momentum is down 8.3%
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-31 02:30 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Mixed
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -8.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Underweight — -0.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Overweight — -3.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -3.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -5.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -4.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — -4.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -9.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — -0.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -2.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -1.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -5.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — +2.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -14.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Overweight — -11.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Neutral — -6.2% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -8.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Overweight — -9.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Neutral — -0.8% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Neutral — +4.7% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Neutral — +5.5% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — +0.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Neutral — -0.4% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Neutral — -3.1% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Neutral — -6.4% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -0.7% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: The neutral ruling breaks if APE closes below $0.1201 or reclaims $0.1704 with RSI rising above 48.0.. Cautious read: a break below $0.1201 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, that 6.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Neutral, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, that 6. Key support to defend sits near $0.1201. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugly number: APE is down 8.3% in seven days and takers lean sellers at 0.93. But price is still 6.4% above SMA200, and the SMA50 sits 8.9% above it—the longer structure hasn’t cracked, so this looks like a pullback inside a surviving base. The August 20 overweight call lost 3.6% versus BTC; that miss argues against swagger, not automatically against the underlying chart.
Leo, that 6.4% SMA200 cushion is exactly the hopium exhibit: APE is still 21.0% below the 60-day high, 2.3% under SMA50, and MACD momentum is contracting. Your “pullback” has 61.8% long accounts and a 1.61 L/S ratio behind it, while taker flow is 0.93. The August 20 overweight call was a LOSS at -3.6% versus BTC, and today’s crowded optimism has not repaired that failure.
I see more upside than the ruling admits: APE is 6.4% above SMA200, with SMA50 8.9% higher than SMA200, and the 60-day low sits 12.1% below spot. If RSI 48.0 turns upward while the 7-day drawdown stabilizes, the distance back toward $0.1704 is underappreciated.
The fastest failure is a break of the $0.1201 60-day low. The fragile exhibit is the bullish MA structure, because price is already 2.3% below SMA50, MACD is contracting, taker buy/sell is 0.93, and the August 20 overweight call lost 3.6% versus BTC.
I think the aggressive desk overreaches by treating SMA200 support as demand despite 61.8% long accounts and a 1.61 L/S ratio. The deciding condition is whether APE holds $0.1201 or reclaims $0.1704; the August 16 and August 14 underweight calls won at -3.2% and -6.7% versus BTC, so downside evidence has recently been more reliable.
· crowded longs at 61.8% and L/S 1.61
· contracting MACD and 7-day loss of 8.3%
· no confirmed funding or fundamental data
Invalidation: The neutral ruling breaks if APE closes below $0.1201 or reclaims $0.1704 with RSI rising above 48.0.
Mara, the 0.1201 low is still 12.1% below spot, so bears haven’t forced a breakdown. RSI at 48.0 is reset, not capitulation.
Leo, reset RSI is not demand. APE closed at 0.1346 after only a 0.1353 high, and the 7-day loss says the tape is already voting.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, the 0.1201 low is still 12.1% below spot, so bears haven’t forced a breakdown. RSI at 48.0 is reset, not capitulation.
Leo, reset RSI is not demand. APE closed at 0.1346 after only a 0.1353 high, and the 7-day loss says the tape is already voting.
I’m with Mara on flow: 61.8% long accounts and a 1.61 ratio meet a 0.93 taker ratio. That is optimism leaning into weak execution, not clean accumulation.
Theo’s arithmetic is the whole macro case: with no funding data, the crowd’s bullishness is visible but its financing stress is not. The 30-day gain of 3.3% offers little cushion against another liquidity hit.
I rule neutral. The decisive exhibit is the collision between the intact long-term MA structure—price 6.4% above SMA200 and SMA50 8.9% above SMA200—and deteriorating short-term evidence: -8.3% over seven days, 2.3% below SMA50, contracting MACD, and 0.93 taker flow. The recent overweight LOSS on August 20 at -3.6% versus BTC makes this call different: the current ruling refuses to extrapolate a fragile bullish setup into a directional overweight verdict. I would overturn the neutral ruling toward bearish if APE closes below $0.1201; toward bullish if it reclaims $0.1704 with improving momentum.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Direction: mixed. Evidence families: price structure, moving averages, RSI, MACD, support/resistance. RSI is 48.0 and MACD histogram is contracting; APE is 0.4% above SMA20, 2.3% below SMA50, and 6.4% above SMA200, while SMA50 remains 8.9% above SMA200. Conflicts: bullish long-term MA structure versus weak short-term momentum and a 21.0% gap below the 60-day high. Sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Direction: bearish. Evidence families: Fear & Greed, account skew, taker flow. Greed is elevated at 62, long accounts lead at 61.8% with a 1.61 L/S ratio, yet taker buy/sell is only 0.93, implying buyers are not controlling the tape. Conflicts: bullish crowd mood versus bearish taker flow; StockTwits has 0 bullish and 0 bearish messages from 0 posts. Sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
APE-specific headlines are noisy: one item cites an 80% rally and another promotes a speculative meme-coin whitelist, while the remaining entries are price-index or exchange pages. The broader headlines provide no concrete APE catalyst; Saylor’s Bitcoin comment is not a direct fundamental driver for APE.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
The data pack supplies no token-supply, unlock, treasury, adoption, revenue, or governance metrics. Fundamental direction is neutral by evidence, with limited support for a durable months-long thesis.
Paste this into your site. The card shows our latest verdict and settled record, and updates itself.
Media and creators may cite CoinVerdict data with attribution and a link back.
5f44236509364eaf7cfd31ec11561268004218a43177f2cb358cb32744b987aaNot yet committed. Today's rulings are hashed into the chain after the daily run — until then this report has a fingerprint but no chain entry. · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23 · 2026-08-22