W / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
W trades at $0.0095, with the long-term trend still sharply underwater
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-07-16 01:19 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-29 — Underweight — +4.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-28 — Overweight — +1.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-27 — Underweight — +1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-26 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-25 — Underweight — -2.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-24 — Neutral — -3.8% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -3.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-22 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-21 — Underweight — -2.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -3.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -2.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +4.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -1.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +2.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — +0.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — +2.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -2.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — +0.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -6.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — -6.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -7.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -9.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -6.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -5.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — +0.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -1.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — +1.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -1.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -8.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -5.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -7.0% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions
Invalidation: A sustained reclaim of $0.00964 accompanied by RSI above 50 would invalidate the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.00846 voids this research. Confidence High — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, your “losing torque” is doing all the heavy lifting.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, your “losing torque” is doing all the heavy lifting. Key support to defend sits near $0.00846. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugly number, Mara: W sits 45.8% below its SMA200 and the 60-day drawdown to $0.01383 is brutal. But RSI at 44.2 and a contracting MACD histogram say the sellers are losing torque, while Extreme Fear at 25 is the kind of packed room where one spark can trigger a bounce toward $0.00964.
Leo, your “losing torque” is doing all the heavy lifting. The close at $0.00949 is still below every major moving average, SMA50 sits 42.1% below SMA200, and the nearest meaningful structure is the $0.00846 low—not a recovery chart, just a damaged asset flirting with its floor.
· Extreme-Fear rebound
· MACD contraction
· broader tokenization adoption
Invalidation: A sustained reclaim of $0.00964 accompanied by RSI above 50 would invalidate the bearish ruling.
Mara, a 1.2% seven-day decline and contracting MACD aren’t a fresh breakdown. If $0.00949 holds, a mean-reversion trade toward the $0.00964 high is plainly available.
Leo, that is a 1.6% scalp, not a verdict. Long accounts at 57.0% and a 1.32 ratio mean the crowd is already positioned for your bounce, while taker flow at 1.00 refuses to confirm it.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, a 1.2% seven-day decline and contracting MACD aren’t a fresh breakdown. If $0.00949 holds, a mean-reversion trade toward the $0.00964 high is plainly available.
Leo, that is a 1.6% scalp, not a verdict. Long accounts at 57.0% and a 1.32 ratio mean the crowd is already positioned for your bounce, while taker flow at 1.00 refuses to confirm it.
Leo, I’m afraid the tape has misplaced your catalyst: taker buy/sell is exactly 1.00, and the long skew is modest but still one-sided. That’s not capitulation; it’s crowded patience.
Mara has the regime right. With W 31.4% below the $0.01383 60-day high and no coin-specific fundamental catalyst in the pack, liquidity has no reason to rescue a chart beneath its SMA200.
I rule for Mara and Dmitri: the single decisive exhibit is W trading 45.8% below its SMA200 while the 60-day low sits at $0.00846. I would overturn this ruling only if W reclaims $0.00964 and RSI rises above 50.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
The chart is bearish: price sits 2.8% below SMA20, 6.4% below SMA50, and 45.8% below SMA200. RSI at 44.2 and a contracting MACD histogram show selling pressure easing, but the 0.00949 close remains near the $0.00846 60-day low.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Extreme Fear at 25 can fuel a reflex bounce, but 57.0% of long accounts and a 1.32 long/short ratio show traders are already leaning into that hope. Taker buy/sell at 1.00 offers no demand imbalance; sentiment evidence is adequate but conflicted.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
The DTCC’s move into live tokenized-securities trading and the Cantor–Securitize IPO collaboration support blockchain adoption broadly, not necessarily Wormhole demand. The $18 million Ostium exploit reinforces a hostile DeFi-security backdrop, while the Base leadership setback adds little direct W-specific information.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
The data pack provides no Wormhole-specific token-economics, usage, revenue, unlock, or valuation figures. Broad institutional blockchain headlines are insufficient to offset the absence of coin-specific fundamental support.
a4c46b589e7450ab4df93046e3d01fa86fabaae909c2600b3047392de46a08436da543ec34b237c483d95fc9d70813ee7d11bb2d47e02a9a1b3e1847a4282badCommitted 2026-07-24T10:21:07+00:00 · 67 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-09-05 · 2026-09-01 · 2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25