SAND / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
SAND sits at $0.04149 with RSI 30.6, but the trend still points lower
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-07-30 01:43 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Shorts pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-09-01 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-31 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-30 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-29 — Underweight — -1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-28 — Underweight — -4.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-27 — Underweight — -7.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-26 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-25 — Underweight — -9.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -15.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-22 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-21 — Underweight — -14.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -6.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -0.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -0.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — -4.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — -1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -5.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — -3.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -4.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -5.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -2.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -6.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -2.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -4.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -5.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -9.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -10.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -8.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -8.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -4.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -4.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -5.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -4.5% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: A sustained reclaim above $0.04600, with RSI recovering above 50, would overturn the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.04017 voids this research. Confidence High — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, your “snapback” rests on RSI, while the price structure is still broken.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, your “snapback” rests on RSI, while the price structure is still broken. Key support to defend sits near $0.04017. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugly number: SAND is 45.4% under its SMA200 and down 10.8% over 30 days. But Leo says that damage is stale and crowded; RSI 30.6, Fear&Greed at 28, and a 60-day low only 3.3% below price can fuel a sharp snapback before bears get their victory lap.
Leo, your “snapback” rests on RSI, while the price structure is still broken. SAND sits below the SMA20 by 10.3%, below the SMA50 by 15.1%, below the SMA200 by 45.4%, and the MACD histogram is expanding at -0.0004243—the alleged fuel is leaking through the floor.
· Oversold RSI-driven rebound
· Breakout above $0.04600
· Crowded long liquidation already largely priced in
Invalidation: A sustained reclaim above $0.04600, with RSI recovering above 50, would overturn the bearish ruling.
Mara, you’re treating oversold as irrelevant because it’s inconvenient. If SAND holds $0.04017, the nearest 60-day low, your trend argument becomes a crowded short with very little room before a reflex rally.
Leo, holding $0.04017 is hypothetical; the tape already closed at $0.04148 after a -2.17% day and takers bought at only 0.89 relative to sells. Break that low and your reflex rally becomes forced liquidation.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, you’re treating oversold as irrelevant because it’s inconvenient. If SAND holds $0.04017, the nearest 60-day low, your trend argument becomes a crowded short with very little room before a reflex rally.
Leo, holding $0.04017 is hypothetical; the tape already closed at $0.04148 after a -2.17% day and takers bought at only 0.89 relative to sells. Break that low and your reflex rally becomes forced liquidation.
Leo, I see the crowd’s problem: 53.4% of long accounts and a 1.15 L/S ratio mean positioning isn’t washed out. With no funding-rate print, I can’t call longs expensive—but I can call them insufficiently capitulated.
Mara has the macro wind at her back. Crypto revenue cooling at Robinhood and renewed debate over crypto limits are not SAND-specific, but they keep liquidity-sensitive tokens vulnerable while price sits 42.0% below the 60-day high.
I rule for Mara and Dmitri: the decisive exhibit is the expanding MACD histogram at -0.0004243 alongside price 45.4% below the SMA200. My ruling flips only if SAND reclaims $0.04600, the approximate level implied by a 10.3% recovery to the SMA20, and holds above it.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
The chart is a falling knife: SAND trades 45.4% below its SMA200, with the bearish SMA50/SMA200 spread at -35.7%. RSI 30.6 is oversold, but expanding MACD weakness and a 60-day low at $0.04017 keep sellers in control.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Fear&Greed is 28, while 53.4% of long accounts and a 1.15 L/S ratio show the crowd still leaning long into pain. Taker buy/sell at 0.89 says immediate aggression favors sellers; there is no funding data to rescue the bulls.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
The headlines offer no SAND-specific catalyst capable of reversing the tape. Crypto-policy debate and cooling crypto revenue at Robinhood reinforce a broader risk-sensitive backdrop, while the kidnapping report is a security headline rather than a token fundamental.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
The data pack provides no fresh token-economics, adoption, revenue, or supply metrics for SAND. On the available evidence, fundamentals cannot counterbalance the deep discount to the SMA200 or the 42.0% gap to the 60-day high.
1e4d00e8b841cbe435f213f75838185dbec2f2984e0d62fe3c3352c771453b9faa060d7030c0f8a7ef90b4eff282d9df7889a97182b9445afd6aba086b7e303cCommitted 2026-07-31T00:20:00+00:00 · 100 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-09-05 · 2026-09-01 · 2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25