SAND / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
Bridge damage and a bearish moving-average stack overshadow SAND’s 0.2% premium to SMA20
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-26 01:39 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Shorts pay
F
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -15.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Underweight — -14.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -6.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -0.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -0.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — -4.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — -1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -5.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — -3.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -4.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -5.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -2.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -6.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -2.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -4.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -5.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -9.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -10.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -8.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -8.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -4.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -4.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -5.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -4.5% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: A decisive close above 0.05297 would overturn the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.03756 voids this research. Confidence High — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: I’m Mara Frost: Leo’s “lost thrust” rests on a microscopic MACD histogram of +0.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: I’m Mara Frost: Leo’s “lost thrust” rests on a microscopic MACD histogram of +0. Key support to defend sits near $0.03756. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’m Leo Vance: yes, SAND sits 36.4% below SMA200 and the 60-day high is 21.7% away, but that wreckage is already painted on the chart. Price is holding 0.04151, just 10.5% above the 0.03756 low, while RSI at 47.5 and a positive MACD histogram show the sellers have lost some immediate thrust.
I’m Mara Frost: Leo’s “lost thrust” rests on a microscopic MACD histogram of +0.0003253 that is explicitly contracting. The real structure is not a rebound—it’s price 5.4% below SMA50, 36.4% below SMA200, with SMA50 trailing SMA200 by 32.7%; calling that priced in is hopium wearing a hard hat.
I see more downside than the ruling admits: 59.6% of accounts are long, the long/short ratio is 1.47, and taker buy/sell is only 0.89. A break of 0.03756 could turn crowded optimism into a much sharper repricing.
The fastest failure is a relief rally: RSI at 47.5 is not oversold, price is already 0.2% above SMA20, and MACD remains positive at +0.0003253. If SAND clears 0.05297, the bearish chart thesis is the fragile exhibit.
The aggressive desk overreaches by treating absent funding data as confirmation, while the conservative desk overweights short-term momentum. The deciding condition is whether 0.03756 holds or breaks; the settled record supports the bearish side with 2 WIN and 0 LOSS among resolved calls.
· relief rally above SMA20
· exploit remediation and supply clarification
· crowded longs unwinding
Invalidation: A decisive close above 0.05297 would overturn the bearish ruling.
Mara, the 7-day tape is still +0.5%, and price reclaimed SMA20 by 0.2%; that’s a base trying to form, not a free fall.
Leo, the 30-day result is -4.3%, and the 60-day high remains 21.7% overhead. A one-week bounce does not erase a month of decay.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, the 7-day tape is still +0.5%, and price reclaimed SMA20 by 0.2%; that’s a base trying to form, not a free fall.
Leo, the 30-day result is -4.3%, and the 60-day high remains 21.7% overhead. A one-week bounce does not erase a month of decay.
I’m Theo Okafor: the crowd is leaning the wrong way—59.6% long accounts and a 1.47 long/short ratio, while takers print 0.89. With funding unavailable, I won’t invent a carry signal, but the observable skew favors a flush if support fails.
I’m Dmitri Volkov: 0.04151 is not a macro escape hatch when the asset remains 36.4% under SMA200. Liquidity can make weak charts look stable right before the next air pocket.
I’m Judge Aldrich: the bearish side wins, decided by the exploit evidence alongside the 32.7% bearish SMA50-versus-SMA200 spread. The call is overturned if SAND closes decisively above 0.05297, the 60-day high, while momentum confirms.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
I’m Kai Nakamura: direction bearish. Evidence families: moving averages, momentum, support/resistance; conflicts: RSI is neutral at 47.5, MACD histogram is positive at +0.0003253, and price is 0.2% above SMA20. Sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
I’m Sofia Reyes: direction bearish. Evidence families: Fear & Greed at 65, account skew with 59.6% long accounts and a 1.47 long/short ratio, plus taker buy/sell at 0.89; conflicts: only one StockTwits message was bullish, so social evidence is thin. Sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
I’m Ed Walsh: the 14.7 million SAND Ethereum-vault drain and the halt of Base and BNB bridging are the headlines that matter. The broader blockchain-bank stories do little to repair a token-specific trust and supply overhang.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
I’m Priya Anand: an exploit that reportedly created unbacked SAND raises immediate questions about circulating-supply integrity and market confidence. Until the bridge and token-accounting damage is clearly contained, the fundamental case is impaired.
7784c518093534bce219b8da6fa772ffb69e16141e01da00e5faafec6d755b98650479c8d662b50f512b6a5ccfb1242fb411c562a0dabecc0eed582b87132f9fCommitted 2026-08-27T00:20:00+00:00 · 93 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-23 · 2026-08-22