SAND / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
SAND sits at $0.04824 with RSI 43.3 and a 40.5% discount to its 200-day average
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-07-16 01:25 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Shorts pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-29 — Underweight — -1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-28 — Underweight — -4.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-27 — Underweight — -7.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-26 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-25 — Underweight — -9.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -15.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-22 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-21 — Underweight — -14.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -6.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -0.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -0.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — -4.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — -1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -5.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — -3.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -4.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -5.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -2.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -6.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -2.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -4.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -5.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -9.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -10.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -8.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -8.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -4.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -4.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -5.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -4.5% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated by a sustained break above $0.04846 accompanied by RSI(14) moving above 50.. Cautious read: a break below $0.04486 voids this research. Confidence High — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, that MACD figure is precisely the hopium exhibit: it’s contracting, not accelerating, while price remains below every major moving-average reference.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, that MACD figure is precisely the hopium exhibit: it’s contracting, not accelerating, while price remains below every major moving-average reference. Key support to defend sits near $0.04486. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede Mara’s strongest number: SAND is 40.5% below SMA200 and the 30-day loss is 9.3%. But RSI at 43.3 isn’t capitulation, and the positive MACD histogram at +0.0003425 says the selling engine is losing torque; with price only 7.6% above $0.04486, a beaten-down bounce has room to ignite.
Leo, that MACD figure is precisely the hopium exhibit: it’s contracting, not accelerating, while price remains below every major moving-average reference. The decisive fact is the bearish 50/200 structure—SMA50 is 34.8% below SMA200—so a small positive histogram cannot overturn a nine-month-style trend signal.
· Oversold rebound from $0.04486
· Extreme Fear at 25 reversing sharply
· Sector tokenization headlines attracting speculative flows
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated by a sustained break above $0.04846 accompanied by RSI(14) moving above 50.
Mara, the market has already priced in the ugly chart: SAND is 34.9% under the 60-day high. Extreme Fear at 25 creates fuel for a reflex rally if $0.04486 holds.
Leo, being 34.9% below the high isn’t value—it’s evidence of failed demand. And your $0.04486 floor is only 7.6% away; a modest break turns your bounce thesis into another leg down.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, the market has already priced in the ugly chart: SAND is 34.9% under the 60-day high. Extreme Fear at 25 creates fuel for a reflex rally if $0.04486 holds.
Leo, being 34.9% below the high isn’t value—it’s evidence of failed demand. And your $0.04486 floor is only 7.6% away; a modest break turns your bounce thesis into another leg down.
I’m siding with the forensic read on positioning. Long accounts are 63.8%, the ratio is 1.76, and takers are net sellers at 0.97; the crowd is positioned for the rebound it hasn’t earned.
Theo’s numbers fit the macro tape: there’s no verified funding-rate cushion in this pack, and sector headlines don’t create liquidity for SAND. Tokenized securities may be a long-term story, but SAND is trading the short-term risk regime.
I award the bear side the ruling, and the single decisive exhibit is SAND’s bearish moving-average structure: SMA50 is 34.8% below SMA200 while price is 40.5% below SMA200. I overturn this verdict only if SAND reclaims $0.04846 and sustains above it with RSI rising above 50.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
The chart is firmly bearish: SAND trades 8.8% below SMA50 and 40.5% below SMA200, while SMA50 sits 34.8% beneath SMA200. RSI 43.3 and a contracting positive MACD histogram offer only a weak countertrend pulse; support is $0.04486 and resistance is $0.07411.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
The crowd is fearful, with Fear & Greed at 25, but longs still control 63.8% of accounts and the long/short ratio is 1.76. That combination is dangerous: fear is loud, yet positioning still leans long, while taker buy/sell at 0.97 shows no aggressive demand.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
The headlines split between institutional blockchain adoption and fresh crypto infrastructure damage. DTCC tokenized securities entering live trading and Cantor-Securitize’s IPO collaboration are constructive for the sector, but they do not provide a direct SAND catalyst; the $18 million Ostium exploit keeps risk sentiment fragile.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
The data pack provides no SAND-specific revenue, adoption, treasury, unlock, or token-supply figures. Sector-wide tokenization headlines are supportive in principle, but without coin-specific fundamental evidence, they cannot offset SAND’s weak market structure.
cc6e82b8dbde7ad8d15acaea09041980aaef552d85b61695b87ff68801a4ce556da543ec34b237c483d95fc9d70813ee7d11bb2d47e02a9a1b3e1847a4282badCommitted 2026-07-24T10:21:07+00:00 · 67 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-09-05 · 2026-09-01 · 2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25