SAND / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
SAND sits at $0.04758, only 6.1% above its 60-day low as the rebound case struggles against a broken trend.
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-07-21 00:45 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Shorts pay
A+
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-29 — Underweight — -1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-28 — Underweight — -4.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-27 — Underweight — -7.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-26 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-25 — Underweight — -9.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -15.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-22 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-21 — Underweight — -14.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -6.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -0.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -0.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — -4.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — -1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -5.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — -3.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -4.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -5.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -2.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -6.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -2.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -4.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -5.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -9.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -10.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -8.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -8.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -4.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -4.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -5.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -4.5% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated by a sustained reclaim above $0.05000 with RSI(14) above 50.. Cautious read: a break below $0.04486 voids this research. Confidence High — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, your “spark” is fighting a collapsing staircase.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, your “spark” is fighting a collapsing staircase. Key support to defend sits near $0.04486. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugliest number, Mara: SAND is 40.1% below its SMA200 and down 14.3% over 30 days. But the tape is trying to turn—the MACD histogram is expanding at +0.0001991, RSI is only 42.9 rather than washed out, and taker buy/sell has edged to 1.02. That’s a spark near $0.04758, not proof the floor is already gone.
Leo, your “spark” is fighting a collapsing staircase. SAND remains 2.0% below SMA20, 6.2% below SMA50, and 35.6% beneath the $0.07385 60-day high; an expanding MACD histogram in a downtrend is merely less bad momentum, not a reversal. The 60-day low at $0.04486 is only 6.1% away, so your bounce argument is priced against a very nearby trapdoor.
· MACD histogram expansion at +0.0001991
· Extreme Fear reversal
· taker buy/sell at 1.02
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated by a sustained reclaim above $0.05000 with RSI(14) above 50.
Mara, you’re treating every bearish moving average as a fresh catalyst. At $0.04758, the market has already absorbed a 3.0% seven-day slide and 14.3% monthly damage; even a modest push above $0.048 can force that crowded fear trade to move.
Leo, crowded fear doesn’t equal forced buying when 60.1% of long accounts are already on your side. The 1.51 long/short ratio gives sellers fuel, and a break of $0.04486 would turn your supposed base into liquidation scenery.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, you’re treating every bearish moving average as a fresh catalyst. At $0.04758, the market has already absorbed a 3.0% seven-day slide and 14.3% monthly damage; even a modest push above $0.048 can force that crowded fear trade to move.
Leo, crowded fear doesn’t equal forced buying when 60.1% of long accounts are already on your side. The 1.51 long/short ratio gives sellers fuel, and a break of $0.04486 would turn your supposed base into liquidation scenery.
Leo, I’ll grant the taker ratio at 1.02 is marginally constructive, but it’s hardly a positioning coup. Longs at 60.1% without funding data leave the supposed squeeze unproven—and the market has not supplied the confirmation you’re implying.
Mara has the regime point: SAND is 40.1% under SMA200, and the 60-day high is 35.6% above spot. That is not a liquidity-led recovery profile; it’s a weak asset waiting for broad risk appetite to do all the work.
I rule for Mara and the bears. The decisive exhibit is SAND’s price sitting 40.1% below SMA200 while only 6.1% above the $0.04486 60-day low. I overturn this ruling only if price reclaims $0.05000 and RSI(14) rises above 50.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Kai Nakamura: The technical direction is bearish. Price is 2.0% below SMA20, 6.2% below SMA50, and 40.1% below SMA200; RSI(14) at 42.9 is weak, while the expanding MACD histogram at +0.0001991 is the countertrend conflict. The evidence is adequate across trend, momentum, and key-level families.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Sofia Reyes: Sentiment direction is bearish. Fear&Greed is 25, or Extreme Fear, while long accounts still control 60.1% with a 1.51 long/short ratio; taker buy/sell at 1.02 offers only a thin demand offset. The evidence is adequate across crowd fear, positioning, and taker-flow families.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Ed Walsh: The news direction is neutral-to-bearish. A Sandbox community call is constructive but lacks a quantified catalyst, while the reported kidnapping attempt involving the co-founder's wife is a reputational negative. The broader headlines on Cardano and Exodus do not provide a direct SAND-specific tailwind.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
Priya Anand: The fundamentals direction is neutral. The data pack provides no token-supply, usage, revenue, unlock, or valuation figures to establish a fundamental rerating case. A community call may support engagement, but it is not evidence of improved token economics.
7e25ce0efa2dc6ca9ecdde37f1619aa2d52bcd3bf3f87b9f4c5132fc69e109188493ea2a32b8f699d8d9f64cbb801351e81386c424ce90ba6ee879a91604b285Committed 2026-07-24T10:21:07+00:00 · 67 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-09-05 · 2026-09-01 · 2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25