SAND / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
SAND sits at $0.04122 with RSI 37.4 and a 41.4% discount to its 200-day average
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-11 01:50 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -4.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -5.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -2.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -6.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -2.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -4.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -5.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -9.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -10.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -8.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -8.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -4.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -4.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -5.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -4.5% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated if SAND reclaims $0.04400 while RSI(14) rises above 50.. Cautious read: a break below $0.04017 voids this research. Confidence High — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: I’m Mara Frost: Leo’s spring is nailed to a collapsing frame.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: I’m Mara Frost: Leo’s spring is nailed to a collapsing frame. Key support to defend sits near $0.04017. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’m Leo Vance, and I’ll concede the ugliest number: SAND is 41.4% below SMA200, with a bearish SMA50/SMA200 spread of -34.5%. But RSI is already down at 37.4, the 60-day low is only $0.04017 away, and MACD histogram is expanding at +0.0001497—this can be a bruised spring, not fresh air beneath the floor.
I’m Mara Frost: Leo’s spring is nailed to a collapsing frame. The $0.04017 low is just 2.6% below price, so his “floor” offers almost no cushion, while SAND remains 13.9% lower over 30 days and 35.9% below the $0.06431 high. A positive MACD histogram beside a 41.4% SMA200 deficit is a tiny candle flicker, not a trend reversal.
· MACD histogram expansion at +0.0001497
· RSI 37.4 rebound
· Break above SMA20
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated if SAND reclaims $0.04400 while RSI(14) rises above 50.
Mara, you’re treating the nearest low as destiny; I’m treating RSI 37.4 and improving MACD as evidence that sellers are tiring.
Leo, tiring sellers haven’t reclaimed even SMA20: price is still 3.1% underneath it. Your momentum flicker has yet to repair the chart’s basic damage.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, you’re treating the nearest low as destiny; I’m treating RSI 37.4 and improving MACD as evidence that sellers are tiring.
Leo, tiring sellers haven’t reclaimed even SMA20: price is still 3.1% underneath it. Your momentum flicker has yet to repair the chart’s basic damage.
I’m Theo Okafor: the crowd isn’t washed out. Long accounts are 59.4%, the ratio is 1.46, and taker buy/sell is 0.85—buyers are leaning into weakness without flow confirmation.
I’m Dmitri Volkov: Fear&Greed at 29 says liquidity appetite is thin. Without a macro impulse in the pack, a 0.85 taker ratio reads like demand trying to catch a falling coin.
I’m Judge Aldrich: the bearish side wins, chiefly because the price structure overwhelms the countertrend MACD uptick. The decisive exhibit is SAND’s 41.4% discount to SMA200, reinforced by a 13.9% 30-day loss and long-heavy crowding. This ruling is overturned if price reclaims $0.04400 while RSI rises above 50; absent that, the $0.04017 low remains the immediate fault line.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
I’m Kai Nakamura: bearish. SAND trades 3.1% below SMA20, 10.5% below SMA50, and 41.4% below SMA200; SMA50 is 34.5% beneath SMA200. RSI 37.4 and MACD histogram +0.0001497 conflict: downside structure dominates, but short-term momentum is trying to stabilize. Direction: bearish; evidence families: moving averages, RSI, MACD, multi-period returns, support/resistance; conflicts: positive MACD histogram; sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
I’m Sofia Reyes: bearish. Fear&Greed is 29, yet long accounts still lead at 59.4% with a 1.46 long/short ratio, while taker buy/sell is only 0.85—fear is present, but longs haven’t capitulated. Direction: bearish; evidence families: Fear&Greed, account skew, taker flow, social activity; conflicts: no StockTwits sample and fear could be near exhaustion; sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
I’m Ed Walsh: bearish by omission, not by headline theater. The supplied SAND-specific headlines are mostly conversion pages, NFT-floor data, and a reported kidnapping attempt involving a co-founder’s wife; none establishes a fresh operating catalyst, while the broader crypto headlines point to losses and valuation debate elsewhere. News direction: bearish/neutral; evidence families: SAND-specific headline quality, broader crypto risk tone; conflicts: no direct protocol or regulatory catalyst; sufficiency: limited.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
I’m Priya Anand: neutral-to-bearish. The pack gives no revenue, token-unlock, treasury, user-growth, or ecosystem-usage figures, so there is no fundamental evidence to counter SAND’s 30-day decline of 13.9%. The 60-day high at $0.06431 is still 35.9% away, and the absence of fundamental support keeps the recovery case speculative.
492dd91af4519b2b69f7bb7a4cd2867f3ea5f2ae7b608d03bab7e874a408f56b2c8e61ed9717fc037f2346806fbddf89aba5fc9628deaa1b4eb639daad8c0736Committed 2026-08-12T00:20:00+00:00 · 92 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-10 · 2026-08-09 · 2026-08-08 · 2026-08-06 · 2026-08-05 · 2026-08-04 · 2026-08-03 · 2026-08-02