SAND / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
SAND sits at $0.0451 with RSI 36.1, but the trend still points lower
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-07-26 00:51 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Shorts pay
B
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-30 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-29 — Underweight — -1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-28 — Underweight — -4.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-27 — Underweight — -7.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-26 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-25 — Underweight — -9.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -15.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-22 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-21 — Underweight — -14.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -6.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -0.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -0.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — -4.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — -1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -5.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — -3.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -4.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -5.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -2.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -6.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -2.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -4.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -5.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -9.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -10.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -8.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -8.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -4.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -4.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -5.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -4.5% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: A sustained move above $0.0451 with RSI(14) above 50 and a contracting negative MACD histogram would invalidate the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.04392 voids this research. Confidence High — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, you’re polishing a dent and calling it a rebound.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, you’re polishing a dent and calling it a rebound. Key support to defend sits near $0.04392. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugly number, Mara: SAND is 41.9% below its SMA200 and the 30-day loss is 4.9%. But RSI at 36.1 says the instrument is bruised, not buried, and the price is only 2.6% above the $0.04392 60-day floor; that’s where stale shorts can get squeezed. A 0.334% daily gain near support is a spark, not a funeral bell.
Leo, you’re polishing a dent and calling it a rebound. The decisive number is not RSI 36.1; it’s the full bearish stack: SAND remains 5.1% below SMA20, 9.1% below SMA50, and 41.9% below SMA200, with MACD histogram still expanding negatively. Sitting 2.6% above support means the floor is being tested, not defended.
· Oversold relief rally from $0.04392
· Long liquidation after 55.6% long accounts
· Unlisted SAND-specific catalyst
Invalidation: A sustained move above $0.0451 with RSI(14) above 50 and a contracting negative MACD histogram would invalidate the bearish ruling.
Mara, the $0.04392 low is visible risk, and fear at 26 is already broadcast from every rooftop. If buyers hold that level, a relief move toward $0.0451 and beyond can punish late shorts.
Leo, takers disagree with your squeeze story: buy/sell is 0.83, and long accounts are already 55.6% of the book. That’s fragile long exposure leaning into a falling chart, not a clean short trap.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, the $0.04392 low is visible risk, and fear at 26 is already broadcast from every rooftop. If buyers hold that level, a relief move toward $0.0451 and beyond can punish late shorts.
Leo, takers disagree with your squeeze story: buy/sell is 0.83, and long accounts are already 55.6% of the book. That’s fragile long exposure leaning into a falling chart, not a clean short trap.
Leo, I’m with Mara on the positioning read. An L/S ratio of 1.25 alongside taker buy/sell at 0.83 says dip buyers are present, but they’re not showing aggressive execution; the crowd is leaning long without winning the tape.
Colleagues, the macro headline flow gives SAND no liquidity rescue in this pack. Russia’s planned crypto infrastructure may help broad crypto rails eventually, but it does nothing today to erase a 36.0% SMA50-versus-SMA200 deficit.
I rule for the bears, and the single decisive exhibit is SAND’s bearish moving-average structure: price is 41.9% below SMA200 while SMA50 sits 36.0% below SMA200. I overturn this ruling on a sustained break above the $0.0451 current price that is confirmed by RSI reclaiming 50 and a contracting negative MACD histogram.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
SAND is bearish: price is 5.1% below SMA20, 9.1% below SMA50, and 41.9% below SMA200. RSI 36.1 is weak but not deeply oversold, while the expanding negative MACD histogram and 60-day low at $0.04392 keep downside pressure intact.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
SAND sentiment is bearish: Fear & Greed is 26, taker buy/sell is 0.83, and 55.6% of long accounts still lean long with an L/S ratio of 1.25. The conflict is that fear is elevated, but positioning has not fully capitulated; sentiment evidence is adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
SAND-specific headlines offer little durable upside catalyst. The Sandbox community call is the most directly relevant item, while the other AI, kidnapping, and crypto-infrastructure stories are peripheral to SAND’s immediate valuation.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
The data pack provides no concrete token-economics, revenue, adoption, treasury, or valuation figures for SAND. Fundamental conviction is therefore limited, and the available headlines do not offset the market’s established downtrend.
0138dc23db42d5f7dfa42c4cabf88f486a86c7ab6ef3b5ea149e5d7b15b17a18abe367d9f6473120ab57274a47b2717a285a90e3afdaff7e89e6c5e549a3ca83Committed 2026-07-27T00:20:00+00:00 · 100 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-09-05 · 2026-09-01 · 2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25