UNI / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
UNI slips to $3.42 as expanding bearish MACD pressure challenges the 30-day gain
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-07-20 07:05 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A+
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-29 — Overweight — +35.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-28 — Overweight — +30.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-27 — Overweight — +39.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-26 — Overweight — — — VOID
2026-08-25 — Overweight — +24.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-24 — Overweight — +15.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Neutral — +19.6% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-22 — Overweight — — — VOID
2026-08-21 — Overweight — +14.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Neutral — +4.5% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-16 — Underweight — +9.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -5.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -5.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — -10.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-11 — Neutral — -14.0% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-10 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Neutral — -16.3% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Neutral — -16.4% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Neutral — -12.7% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Overweight — -12.0% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — -1.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — +0.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Overweight — -5.5% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Overweight — -5.7% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Overweight — -10.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Overweight — -9.5% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Overweight — +1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Overweight — -1.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Neutral — +6.0% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Overweight — +9.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — +14.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Overweight — +16.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Neutral — +18.5% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Neutral — +8.6% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Overweight — +7.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Neutral — +4.4% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — +10.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Neutral — +3.7% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Neutral — +3.6% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions
Invalidation: A decisive close above $3.846 would invalidate the bearish swing verdict.. Cautious read: a break below $3.41 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, that 13.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, that 13. Key support to defend sits near $3.41. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugly exhibit: UNI is 6.0% below SMA200, and the MACD histogram is expanding at -0.01074. But Leo sees that as stale overhead, not a fresh collapse; the token is still 12.5% above SMA50, up 13.8% over 30 days, and burn-plus-fee proposals could turn this pullback into a loaded spring.
Leo, that 13.8% gain is exactly the number being attacked: today’s close is 3.419, down 3.58%, with takers buying at only 0.92 of sellers. Being above SMA50 means little when SMA50 itself sits 16.4% below SMA200; that is not a spring, it’s a lower rung on a damaged ladder.
· UNI burn approval and fee realization
· Sharp DeFi-sector rebound
· Short-covering above $3.554
Invalidation: A decisive close above $3.846 would invalidate the bearish swing verdict.
Leo, your burn thesis has no realized burn figure behind it. Why should I price a proposal as cash flow when UNI is already failing at 3.554 intraday?
Mara, because fear is already loud at 29, and 55.4% long accounts aren’t euphoric leverage. If UNI reclaims 3.846, your bearish structure loses its headline exhibit.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Leo, your burn thesis has no realized burn figure behind it. Why should I price a proposal as cash flow when UNI is already failing at 3.554 intraday?
Mara, because fear is already loud at 29, and 55.4% long accounts aren’t euphoric leverage. If UNI reclaims 3.846, your bearish structure loses its headline exhibit.
I’m with Mara on the tape: a 1.24 L/S ratio paired with a 0.92 taker ratio is weak positioning quality. Longs are present, but aggressive demand isn’t.
And the macro backdrop is hardly generous: Bitcoin ETF inflows are described as ‘peanuts’ after the exodus, while oil is at a one-month high. Liquidity is not volunteering to rescue a token below SMA200.
I rule for the bears, and the decisive exhibit is the bearish moving-average structure: SMA50 is 16.4% below SMA200 while MACD deterioration expands at -0.01074. UNI needs a decisive close above $3.846 to overturn this ruling; otherwise a break below $3.409 reopens the path toward the $2.314 60-day low.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Kai Nakamura: I’m bearish on the swing structure. UNI sits only 0.7% above SMA20 but 6.0% below SMA200, while the SMA50 trails the SMA200 by 16.4% and MACD histogram is worsening at -0.01074.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Sofia Reyes: Fear & Greed is 29, but the crowd is still leaning long, with 55.4% long accounts and a 1.24 L/S ratio. A 0.92 taker buy/sell ratio says buyers aren’t pressing hard enough to validate that optimism.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Ed Walsh: The burn proposal, Robinhood Chain fees, and broader v4 fee discussions are legitimate catalysts, but they remain proposals rather than realized cash flows. The $100 scenario is headline sugar, not an operating result.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
Priya Anand: Potential UNI burns and protocol-fee expansion could improve token economics if governance approves and adoption converts into measurable fee revenue. For now, the data pack provides no realized burn amount, fee total, or valuation support for a fundamental rerating.
5c3186bdb82db0d45ae2d51471fb8131cbdf6823c1b6e1776d32613f4f51763cbb295d7aae9e558a346e804945fde08e4613bfb70347c2a2bf2fe08f555e4fc6Committed 2026-07-24T10:21:07+00:00 · 67 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-09-05 · 2026-09-01 · 2026-08-31 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24