SKY / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
SKY’s 60.2 RSI and 13.4% 30-day gain meet a bearish moving-average structure
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-07-23 00:47 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Mixed
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Neutral
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-29 — Overweight — -1.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-28 — Neutral — -0.9% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-27 — Neutral — -2.8% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-26 — Overweight — — — VOID
2026-08-25 — Overweight — -2.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-24 — Overweight — +1.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Neutral — +4.1% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-22 — Overweight — — — VOID
2026-08-20 — Overweight — -0.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-16 — Underweight — +4.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-12 — Underweight — +4.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-11 — Underweight — +5.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — -2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -2.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -3.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — -4.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -6.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -6.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -7.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -5.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -3.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -1.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +0.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -1.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — +3.7% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Neutral — -5.6% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Neutral — -8.0% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: A sustained close above 0.0711 with RSI(14) holding above 60.2 invalidates the bearish swing ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.04852 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, your 13.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, your 13. Key support to defend sits near $0.04852. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugliest number, Mara: SMA50 is 14.8% below SMA200 and SKY is still 6.0% under that long-term average. But the tape is climbing—13.4% in 30 days, 3.8% in seven, and 6.3% above SMA20—while RSI at 60.2 says the engine has room before overheating; that old moving-average wreckage may be stale overhead, not fresh selling pressure.
Leo, your 13.4% is the exact number that makes this look better than it is: SKY is still 10.8% below the 60-day high at 0.0711 despite that rally. The contracting MACD histogram at +0.0004717 says momentum is already losing thrust, while the 14.8% SMA50/SMA200 gap confirms the rebound is fighting a dominant downtrend.
· USDS-driven protocol revenue near $419M annualized
· Fear&Greed at 31 enabling a contrarian rebound
· No funding-rate data to confirm short-side pressure
Invalidation: A sustained close above 0.0711 with RSI(14) holding above 60.2 invalidates the bearish swing ruling.
Mara, if the rebound were merely hopium, RSI wouldn’t be holding 60.2 and price wouldn’t sit 10.4% above SMA50. SKY has reclaimed the shorter battlefield; the question is whether the market pays attention to stale rear-view mirrors.
Leo, reclaiming SMA50 does not erase the 6.0% deficit to SMA200. Until SKY takes 0.0711, your battlefield is a failed advance below resistance, not a trend reversal.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, if the rebound were merely hopium, RSI wouldn’t be holding 60.2 and price wouldn’t sit 10.4% above SMA50. SKY has reclaimed the shorter battlefield; the question is whether the market pays attention to stale rear-view mirrors.
Leo, reclaiming SMA50 does not erase the 6.0% deficit to SMA200. Until SKY takes 0.0711, your battlefield is a failed advance below resistance, not a trend reversal.
Leo, I’ll give you the positioning angle: 43.9% long accounts and a 0.78 long/short ratio leave no obvious long-side squeeze crowd. But taker buy/sell at 1.02 is only marginally positive, and there is no funding-rate evidence to validate aggressive demand.
Mara’s right about the regime, but I won’t overstate it: fear at 31 can mean sellers are already emotionally spent. Still, without a confirmed liquidity catalyst, SKY’s move remains vulnerable to the same macro tide that kept it 6.0% below SMA200.
I rule for the bears, and the decisive exhibit is the 14.8% bearish SMA50-versus-SMA200 structure combined with SKY sitting 6.0% below SMA200. The 13.4% 30-day rise is a credible counterpunch, but the contracting MACD histogram and failure to reclaim the 0.0711 60-day high leave the advance structurally incomplete. My ruling is overturned by a sustained close above 0.0711 with RSI(14) holding above 60.2.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Kai Nakamura: Bullish short-term momentum has price 6.3% above SMA20 and 10.4% above SMA50, with RSI(14) at 60.2. The chart’s trapdoor is structural: SMA50 sits 14.8% below SMA200, price remains 6.0% under SMA200, and the MACD histogram is contracting at +0.0004717.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Sofia Reyes: Fear&Greed at 31 gives SKY a skeptical crowd backdrop, while only 43.9% of long accounts and a 0.78 long/short ratio show no crowded-long excess. Taker buy/sell at 1.02 is barely constructive, so sentiment supports a rebound thesis without confirming a breakout.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Ed Walsh: The strongest coin-specific headline is Sky Protocol revenue nearing $419M annualized, with USDS demand supporting DeFi income. The broader Clarity Act debate is unresolved, and the remaining headlines range from historical promotion to sensational framing rather than a clean catalyst.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
Priya Anand: Revenue nearing $419M annualized and USDS demand provide a tangible income narrative for Sky Protocol. The pack supplies no token-supply, valuation, or forward-growth figures, so fundamentals support the asset’s utility story but cannot establish a durable price target.
e248bf3dd759fd7a46f2cb95e26dba5820118acb1c903d611f9b4318d934465b8624d818ee7811d0e765aa63f60423eb1e28fec5823b0c3f5024085df84084a2Committed 2026-07-24T10:21:07+00:00 · 100 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-09-05 · 2026-09-01 · 2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25