INJ / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
INJ holds 5.563 USD after a 16.6% weekly surge, with momentum pressing toward 6.067
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-27 01:04 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bullish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Mixed
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Overweight — -6.7% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Overweight — +2.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Overweight — +5.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Neutral — +5.9% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -4.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Neutral — -10.3% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -9.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Overweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-08 — Neutral — -3.6% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Neutral — -2.6% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Neutral — -2.6% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Overweight — -12.0% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Overweight — -16.5% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Neutral — -14.0% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -8.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Overweight — -11.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — +4.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — +4.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +4.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — +4.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Neutral — -1.9% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Neutral — -5.0% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Overweight — -3.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Neutral — -7.8% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Overweight — -9.3% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Overweight — -9.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Overweight — -4.7% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Overweight — +0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — +6.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: A decisive break below 5.511, the latest candle's low, overturns the bullish swing call.. Cautious read: a break below $5.51 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, that staircase is already stretched: RSI is 65.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bullish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: I’ll concede the sharpest bear number: Fear&Greed is 71, and takers are leaning slightly against buyers at 0. Resistance to clear sits near $6.07. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the sharpest bear number: Fear&Greed is 71, and takers are leaning slightly against buyers at 0.96. But INJ is still 17.4% above its SMA20, 14.3% above SMA50, and 32.4% above SMA200; that’s a rising staircase, not a one-candle illusion. With the 60d low at 3.948 sitting 40.9% below spot, the structure has room before the chart’s floor matters.
Leo, that staircase is already stretched: RSI is 65.9 and the MACD histogram is contracting at +0.1464. Your 60d-low cushion is irrelevant to the next swing; the immediate test is 6.067, still 8.3% overhead after a 20.1% monthly gain. If taker buy/sell is 0.96 while 54.9% of accounts are long, the breakout crowd is paying for yesterday’s move.
I see more upside than the ruling admits: a move from 5.563 back to the 60d high at 6.067 would recover an 8.3% gap, while the 7d trend is already +16.6%. The 15.8% SMA50-over-SMA200 spread says the broader impulse is not yet exhausted.
The fastest failure is a crowded momentum unwind: Fear&Greed is 71, 54.9% of accounts are long, and taker buy/sell is only 0.96. The fragile exhibit is the contracting +0.1464 MACD histogram; a break under 5.511 would expose the bullish reading quickly.
Mara overreached by treating the 3.948 low as irrelevant while Leo overreached by calling the trend immune to exhaustion. The deciding condition is whether price holds 5.511 while RSI stays above 50; that keeps the bullish structure intact.
· Greed at 71 with 54.9% long accounts
· Contracting MACD histogram at +0.1464
· Failure below 60d resistance at 6.067
Invalidation: A decisive break below 5.511, the latest candle's low, overturns the bullish swing call.
Mara, a contracting histogram after a 16.6% seven-day climb is digestion, not proof of reversal; the moving-average spread is still decisively positive at 15.8%.
Leo, digestion becomes distribution when price cannot reclaim 6.067, and INJ is already 8.3% short of it. RSI 65.9 leaves little room for fresh impulse without a reset.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, a contracting histogram after a 16.6% seven-day climb is digestion, not proof of reversal; the moving-average spread is still decisively positive at 15.8%.
Leo, digestion becomes distribution when price cannot reclaim 6.067, and INJ is already 8.3% short of it. RSI 65.9 leaves little room for fresh impulse without a reset.
I’m siding with Mara on crowd shape but not her conclusion: 54.9% longs and a 1.22 L/S ratio are elevated, yet no funding data is provided, so claims of extreme carry pressure are unsupported.
The macro headlines are noise for this chart. Nvidia’s earnings strength may support risk appetite, but the pack gives no liquidity measure tying that move to INJ; the price structure must carry the verdict.
I rule for the bullish side. The decisive exhibit is the aligned trend structure: INJ is 17.4% above SMA20, 14.3% above SMA50, and 32.4% above SMA200, with SMA50 15.8% above SMA200. This ruling is overturned by a decisive break below 5.511, the latest candle's low, especially if RSI falls beneath 50.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Direction: bullish. Evidence families: RSI 65.9; price above SMA20/SMA50/SMA200 by 17.4%/14.3%/32.4%; bullish SMA50-over-SMA200 structure; MACD histogram +0.1464. Conflicts: MACD histogram is contracting and price sits 8.3% below the 60d high at 6.067. Sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Direction: mildly bullish but crowded. Evidence families: Fear&Greed 71; long accounts 54.9%; L/S ratio 1.22; 7d gain 16.6%. Conflicts: taker buy/sell is 0.96, showing marginally stronger selling aggression, while StockTwits has 0 bullish versus 0 bearish tags across 5 messages. Sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
I see headline fuel, not a verified catalyst: the local news is dominated by INJ price-prediction pieces and a TradingView report on a 15% jump toward a possible $10 breakout. The broader tape offers Nvidia strength and a revived SEC custody-rule story, but neither directly changes Injective's operating outlook.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
I don't have token-supply, fee, revenue, adoption, or protocol-usage figures in this pack, so I won't manufacture a fundamental thesis. The evidence supports a technical swing call, not a months-long valuation claim.
9fff5eb29bd33768d240a670425f2a4f9b969f4a1e5e9ff39a942f47cb101a1c64bb1ee510b85abc06eb9d0328d74bef4839ac43e76e5a63e96f0ad2d0a0301eCommitted 2026-08-28T00:20:00+00:00 · 93 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23 · 2026-08-22