INJ / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
INJ surges 8.195% to $5.811, but RSI 71.1 and a $6.009 ceiling keep the verdict balanced
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-25 01:05 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bullish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Overweight — -6.7% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Overweight — +2.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Overweight — +5.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Neutral — +5.9% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -4.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Neutral — -10.3% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -9.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Overweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-08 — Neutral — -3.6% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Neutral — -2.6% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Neutral — -2.6% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Overweight — -12.0% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Overweight — -16.5% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Neutral — -14.0% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -8.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Overweight — -11.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — +4.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — +4.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +4.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — +4.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Neutral — -1.9% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Neutral — -5.0% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Overweight — -3.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Neutral — -7.8% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Overweight — -9.3% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Overweight — -9.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Overweight — -4.7% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Overweight — +0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — +6.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: A close below $5.68 overturns the neutral ruling toward bearish; a sustained close above $6.009 with RSI below 75 overturns it toward bullish.. Cautious read: a break below $5.68 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: I’m Mara Frost, and Leo’s locomotive is running straight into the $6.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Neutral, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: I’m Mara Frost, and Leo’s locomotive is running straight into the $6. Key support to defend sits near $5.68. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’m Leo Vance, and yes, RSI at 71.1 is hot and $6.009 is the obvious bear exhibit. But the tape is a locomotive: INJ is up 42.3% in seven days, MACD histogram is expanding at +0.1772, and the 50-day average sits 15.7% above the 200-day average. That makes overbought a speed reading, not automatically a reversal signal.
I’m Mara Frost, and Leo’s locomotive is running straight into the $6.009 wall after a 42.3% weekly sprint. His +0.1772 MACD reading describes acceleration already visible in price; it does not erase RSI 71.1, the 74 greed reading, or the fact that taker buy/sell is only 0.91. Calling that fuel is hopium with a chart attached.
· rejection at $6.009
· crowded greed at 74
· Bitcoin pullback
Invalidation: A close below $5.68 overturns the neutral ruling toward bearish; a sustained close above $6.009 with RSI below 75 overturns it toward bullish.
Mara, the market has already absorbed your favorite warning: INJ still closed at $5.809 and sits only 3.3% below the 60-day high. A breakout attempt has room because the 60-day low is way down at $3.948.
Leo, distance from the low is not support; it is a 47.1% rally cushion that can evaporate. If $6.009 rejects, your momentum exhibit becomes the unwind trigger, not proof of continuation.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, the market has already absorbed your favorite warning: INJ still closed at $5.809 and sits only 3.3% below the 60-day high. A breakout attempt has room because the 60-day low is way down at $3.948.
Leo, distance from the low is not support; it is a 47.1% rally cushion that can evaporate. If $6.009 rejects, your momentum exhibit becomes the unwind trigger, not proof of continuation.
I’m Theo Okafor: the crowd is tilted, with 56.5% long accounts and a 1.30 ratio, but funding is not provided, so nobody gets to invent a squeeze narrative. Taker buy/sell at 0.91 favors my bear-side reading of fragile demand.
I’m Dmitri Volkov: Bitcoin nearing $80,000 is a liquidity tailwind only while it holds. The stated next BTC pullback test means INJ’s 42.3% seven-day gain is especially exposed to a macro air pocket.
I’m Judge Aldrich: the neutral side wins because the decisive exhibit is the collision between a bullish trend—MACD +0.1772 and SMA50 15.7% above SMA200—and an overextended crowd at RSI 71.1, greed 74, and $6.009 resistance. I overturn this ruling if INJ closes above $6.009 with RSI holding below 75, or if it breaks below $5.68, the latest candle low.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
I’m Kai Nakamura: INJ is structurally bullish, with price 25.0% above SMA20, 20.1% above SMA50, and 39.0% above SMA200. But RSI(14) at 71.1 and only 3.3% below the 60-day high of $6.009 flag a stretched move.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
I’m Sofia Reyes: greed is loud at 74, with 56.5% long accounts and a 1.30 long/short ratio. Taker buy/sell at 0.91 is the useful contradiction: bullish chatter is crowded, yet aggressive buying is not confirming it.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
I’m Ed Walsh: the INJ headline set is dominated by price-prediction pieces and generic Layer-1 finance explainers, not a concrete catalyst. Bitcoin nearing $80,000 supplies a supportive backdrop, but the next BTC pullback is explicitly the market’s key test.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
I’m Priya Anand: the pack offers a credible narrative around Injective as a Layer 1 built for on-chain finance. It provides no fresh token-economics, adoption, revenue, or supply figures, so fundamentals cannot justify a multi-month conviction call.
56897762908545cf8f7def73e3755f9dc6081bde3c69d74e6c9fe39aa9f7407c14faabecdb7719003b4bda7de235e76e71170edaad505076d223f4a3b6d33cbeCommitted 2026-08-26T00:20:00+00:00 · 92 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23 · 2026-08-22