INJ / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
INJ slips 6.84% to $4.276 as momentum fractures below its 20- and 50-day averages
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-15 00:57 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Shorts pay
B
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Overweight — -6.7% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Overweight — +2.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Overweight — +5.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Neutral — +5.9% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -4.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Neutral — -10.3% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -9.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Overweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-08 — Neutral — -3.6% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Neutral — -2.6% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Neutral — -2.6% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Overweight — -12.0% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Overweight — -16.5% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Neutral — -14.0% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -8.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Overweight — -11.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — +4.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — +4.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +4.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — +4.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Neutral — -1.9% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Neutral — -5.0% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Overweight — -3.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Neutral — -7.8% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Overweight — -9.3% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Overweight — -9.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Overweight — -4.7% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Overweight — +0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — +6.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated by a sustained reclaim of SMA50, inferred at roughly $4.77 from the stated 11.2% gap above the $4.276 price, with RSI(14) above 50.. Cautious read: a break below $4.02 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, that SMA200 lifeline is exactly the hopium exhibit: it sits only $0.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, that SMA200 lifeline is exactly the hopium exhibit: it sits only $0. Key support to defend sits near $4.02. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugly print: INJ is down 6.84% in 24 hours, sits 11.2% under SMA50, and the MACD histogram is expanding negative. But the stocky backbone is still intact — price is 3.6% above SMA200 and SMA50 is 16.6% above SMA200, so this looks like a hard pullback toward the $4.02 floor, not a confirmed structural collapse. The recent record includes losses on August 4 and August 3 — overweight calls underperformed BTC by 12.0% and 16.5% — but those failures do not erase the current bearish evidence; they show how costly premature optimism has been.
Leo, that SMA200 lifeline is exactly the hopium exhibit: it sits only $0.256 below spot, while the faster trend is already broken and momentum is worsening. A 37.3 RSI is not a reversal signal by itself, and $4.02 is just 6.2% below price — close enough to be tested quickly. The August 4 and August 3 overweight calls both lost badly, and your attempt to rescue the chart with a distant average repeats the same directional error.
· SMA200 support at roughly $4.13
· Sharp fear-driven rebound
· Broad crypto-market reversal
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated by a sustained reclaim of SMA50, inferred at roughly $4.77 from the stated 11.2% gap above the $4.276 price, with RSI(14) above 50.
Mara, the $4.02 low is visible support, not a vacuum. If sellers had full control, the 3.6% cushion above SMA200 would already be gone.
Leo, support only counts after it holds. Price is below SMA20 by 8.3%, below SMA50 by 11.2%, and the MACD deterioration is accelerating — that is pressure, not proof of a floor.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, the $4.02 low is visible support, not a vacuum. If sellers had full control, the 3.6% cushion above SMA200 would already be gone.
Leo, support only counts after it holds. Price is below SMA20 by 8.3%, below SMA50 by 11.2%, and the MACD deterioration is accelerating — that is pressure, not proof of a floor.
I’m with Mara on the tape: 40.8% of long accounts, a 0.69 long/short ratio, and 0.89 taker buy/sell show demand is not leading. Funding is absent, so nobody gets to invent a squeeze narrative.
And the macro tape is no rescue: the pack explicitly frames the latest INJ drop inside a broad crypto selloff. Sector headlines about a White House crypto meeting do not repair a broken short-term trend.
I rule for the bears: the decisive exhibit is the expanding negative MACD histogram alongside INJ trading 11.2% below SMA50. This call is overturned by a sustained reclaim of $4.77, approximately the current price plus the stated 11.2% SMA50 gap, or by RSI(14) recovering above 50 while price regains SMA50.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Bearish — evidence families: RSI(14) 37.3, price 8.3% below SMA20 and 11.2% below SMA50, expanding negative MACD histogram at -0.03507. Conflict: price remains 3.6% above SMA200 and SMA50 sits 16.6% above SMA200, preserving a longer-term bullish structure. Sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Bearish — evidence families: Fear&Greed 34, only 40.8% long accounts, long/short ratio 0.69, and taker buy/sell at 0.89. Conflict: weak crowd exposure can reduce liquidation fuel for further downside; StockTwits data is too sparse at 3 messages. Sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Headlines are mostly background noise: INJ was reported down 5.7% amid a broad crypto selloff, while one FXStreet headline noted a prior rally against the broader market. The Trump-related crypto headlines are sector-level catalysts, not direct Injective evidence.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
The pack provides no fresh Injective revenue, usage, unlock, or valuation figures. Layer-1 and on-chain-finance narratives appear in the headlines, but they do not offset the current price and momentum deterioration.
f35212a01e0ea30a82ae8820bbc17b79b6d7edbe00205a7876e34d5d273fd852b9992f9aaddcb66d097da88829da3966f8938204256939eecd449461ccbccfffCommitted 2026-08-16T00:20:00+00:00 · 96 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23 · 2026-08-22