INJ / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
INJ holds above its 200-day trend by 22.7%, with fear at 28 setting up a bullish rebound case
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-07-19 08:22 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bullish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Mixed
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Shorts pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-29 — Overweight — -9.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-28 — Overweight — -12.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-27 — Overweight — -14.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-25 — Neutral — -14.9% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-24 — Overweight — -6.7% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Overweight — +2.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-22 — Overweight — — — VOID
2026-08-21 — Overweight — +5.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Neutral — +5.9% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -4.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Neutral — -10.3% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -9.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Overweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-08 — Neutral — -3.6% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Neutral — -2.6% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Neutral — -2.6% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Overweight — -12.0% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Overweight — -16.5% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Neutral — -14.0% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -8.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Overweight — -11.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — +4.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — +4.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +4.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — +4.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Neutral — -1.9% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Neutral — -5.0% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Overweight — -3.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Neutral — -7.8% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Overweight — -9.3% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Overweight — -9.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Overweight — -4.7% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Overweight — +0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions
Invalidation: A decisive close below 4.02, the 60-day low, invalidates the bullish swing thesis.. Cautious read: a break below $5.06 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo’s 22.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bullish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: I’ll concede the strongest bear number: INJ closed at 5. Resistance to clear sits near $5.21. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the strongest bear number: INJ closed at 5.086, below its SMA50 by 0.5%, and the MACD histogram is contracting at +0.05107. But that’s a speed bump, not a broken engine—the price remains 22.7% above SMA200, SMA50 is 23.3% above SMA200, and seven-day momentum is still +4.5%.
Leo’s 22.7% above SMA200 is the number he’s hiding behind because the nearer tape is less flattering. INJ is still 30.7% below the 60-day high of 7.344, buyers are not pressing with taker flow at 0.99, and 59.3% longs leave plenty of fuel for a flush.
· long positioning crowding at 59.3%
· contracting MACD momentum
· no confirmed funding-rate data
Invalidation: A decisive close below 4.02, the 60-day low, invalidates the bullish swing thesis.
Mara, being 30.7% below 7.344 describes the damage already done, not the next trade. The decisive local test is 5.211; reclaim that high and your “fuel for a flush” starts looking like trapped shorts.
Leo, you’re calling a breakout before the market has even cleared 5.211. Until then, the contracting MACD and -0.8% 30-day return say the rebound is technically unproven.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, being 30.7% below 7.344 describes the damage already done, not the next trade. The decisive local test is 5.211; reclaim that high and your “fuel for a flush” starts looking like trapped shorts.
Leo, you’re calling a breakout before the market has even cleared 5.211. Until then, the contracting MACD and -0.8% 30-day return say the rebound is technically unproven.
I’ll interrupt both of you: the 1.46 long/short ratio and 59.3% long accounts favor Mara’s overcrowding point, but Fear&Greed at 28 means the crowd isn’t euphoric. That is a combustible setup, not a confirmed trend reversal.
And without funding data, nobody gets to claim leverage is cheap or expensive. I side with the regime risk: a failure at 5.06 would expose the 4.02 60-day low quickly.
I rule for the bulls, and the single decisive exhibit is the bullish moving-average structure: SMA50 is 23.3% above SMA200 while price is 22.7% above SMA200. My ruling is overturned by a decisive break below the 4.02 60-day low, or by RSI falling below 40 while price loses 5.06.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Kai Nakamura: Bullish structure: INJ is 22.7% above its SMA200, while SMA50 sits 23.3% above SMA200. RSI at 53.9 is constructive, but contracting MACD histogram at +0.05107 and the close below SMA50 demand a break above 5.211.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Sofia Reyes: Fear&Greed at 28 gives the crowd a defensive backdrop, not euphoric exhaustion. Still, 59.3% of long accounts and a 1.46 long/short ratio show bullish positioning is already leaning one way, while taker buy/sell at 0.99 lacks aggressive confirmation.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Ed Walsh: The headline slate contains no direct Injective catalyst; most items concern Zcash, Polymarket, payments, or Bitcoin governance. That leaves INJ trading primarily on its chart and broader crypto liquidity rather than a fresh coin-specific narrative.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
Priya Anand: The data pack supplies no Injective-specific token-economics, adoption, revenue, or unlock figures. I therefore give fundamentals no independent bullish impulse and base the verdict on trend structure and positioning.
e27a8fea69f34cfbb6e5328e183e0cd29b47511efab0f9ba4f6f4819c6b167b8f4fc7312c5be5f7d7eea56f69a8be2b8607d9ddd9672db388d49defd4b1498d1Committed 2026-07-24T10:21:07+00:00 · 67 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-09-05 · 2026-09-01 · 2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24