CoinVerdict
中文 Scoreboard

@davthewave — settled call record

✓ Source check: 0 unavailable · 1/1 covered · last sweep 2026-09-02

0% Hit rate · 0 hits · 1 misses · n=1 Archive building (n < 10) avg |move| of hits (absolute, vs USD)

Rate rule: kol_directional_v1 — read the full rule →

95% CI [0.0% – 79.3%] · Wilson 95% interval — where the true rate likely sits.

Last settled 2026-09-02 (0d ago)

Small sample — the interval is wide and the number will move.

BTC

If you had followed

Follow the calls, or just hold BTC?

+$54following every call
+$0just holding BTC
+$54the difference

1 live · 8 backtested — never merged into one number.

These dollar figures are carried by backtests — hypothetical performance from applying the same rule to past statements, not a live track record. Live records: 1 / 9.

Each call is an independent $100 position, closed after 7 days — no compounding, no fees, no slippage. How this is scored →

Rating and benchmarks
Rating Sample building (9/20)

Rating rule: kol_rating_v1 — read the full rule →

Breakdown

By coin

BTC: 0% n=1 · thin

By call

—: 0% n=1 · thin

By window

30d: 0% n=1 · thin 90d: 0% n=1 · thin All time: 0% n=1 · thin
Directional record
CoinCallWhat they said Relative (ranked) Absolute (vs USD) SettledSource
BTC ↑ Bullish either the breakout shortly, or the development of something like a reverse h&s... which would make sense for a bottom MISS -1.4% -1.4% 2026-09-02T00:00:05.171300+00:00 source post → · verdict →

Relative = altcoins scored against BTC, BTC itself against USD — so BTC rows carry the same number in both columns. Absolute is always vs USD, and never carries a verdict.

Backtested records
Hit rate: 62% 5 hits · 3 misses · n=8

Settled after the fact from archived posts — the call was already on the record before we scored it, but we were not watching it live. Kept on a separate line and never merged into the prospective hit rate above.

CoinCallWhat they said Relative (ranked) Absolute (vs USD) SettledSource
BTC backtested ↓ Bearish From recent developments in price, I think it fair to say that, in the shorter to medium-term, the tipping point from a bullish outlook to a bearish one has been reached. HIT -4.2% -4.2% 2026-08-18T23:00:13.822142+00:00 source post → · verdict →
BTC backtested ↑ Bullish - maintaining a multi-year upward technical channel, with price well-positioned within that channel MISS -0.4% -0.4% 2026-08-18T21:00:06.199830+00:00 source post → · verdict →
BTC backtested ↑ Bullish #btc resistance come support, a 50% real retracement of the recent move, the next level to watch. HIT +6.8% +6.8% 2026-08-18T17:00:20.804273+00:00 source post → · verdict →
BTC backtested ↑ Bullish Technically, the road looks open for a move to that shorter-term target of 95K with shorter-term horizontal and longer-term diagonal resistances breaking, price currently atop of a multi-month upward channel. MISS +2.4% +2.4% 2026-08-17T07:00:34.720779+00:00 source post → · verdict →
BTC backtested ↑ Bullish #btc shorter-term upward channel holding. A run to the top of the channel here would have price halfway to the target... MISS -0.1% -0.1% 2026-08-17T07:00:20.188094+00:00 source post → · verdict →
BTC backtested ↑ Bullish #btc ascending triangle in the shorter-term lining up to meet resistance in the longer term... HIT +5.3% +5.3% 2026-08-17T06:30:05.267517+00:00 source post → · verdict →
BTC backtested ↓ Bearish #btc 2nd leg of correction looks to be underway with price back in the 70s range. HIT -12.0% -12.0% 2026-08-17T05:30:04.714380+00:00 source post → · verdict →
BTC backtested ↓ Bearish I'm think something like a continued correction to 70K makes some sense HIT -25.7% -25.7% 2026-08-17T05:00:42.955453+00:00 source post → · verdict →

Relative = altcoins scored against BTC, BTC itself against USD — so BTC rows carry the same number in both columns. Absolute is always vs USD, and never carries a verdict.

Price-target record
Backtested records
Hit rate: 50% 1 hits · 1 misses · n=2

Settled after the fact from archived posts — the call was already on the record before we scored it, but we were not watching it live. Kept on a separate line and never merged into the prospective hit rate above.

Graded under price_target_v1 — did the stated price target print? A different rule, never merged into the directional rate above.

CoinCallResult SettledSource
BTC backtested HIT 2026-08-18 verdict →
BTC backtested MISS 2026-08-17 verdict →
Related accounts
@CryptoMichNL 35% n=23 · 1 coin in common @CryptoTony__ 31% n=13 · 1 coin in common @BigCheds 27% n=11 · 1 coin in common @blknoiz06 60% n=10 · 1 coin in common @CredibleCrypto 11% n=9 · 1 coin in common
Side by side with CoinVerdict
CoinVerdict win rate (settle_v1 vs BTC): 64%

Same ruler on both sides: kol_directional_v1 runs on identical parameters to settle_v1 — a 7-day window, a ±3% band, altcoins scored vs BTC and BTC vs USD. That is why the hit rate above and CoinVerdict's 64% can sit side by side. · How the two differ →

Embed this scorecard

Paste this into your site. The badge updates itself as new calls settle. · Share card (PNG for X)

Live preview — real data, the same script your site loads.

Inline pill · data-cv-style="pill"

Light card · data-cv-style="card"

Dark card · data-cv-style="dark"

Big number · data-cv-style="stat"

Media and creators may cite CoinVerdict data with attribution and a link back.

Source: VeraMind settled-call ledger · only verified settlements, never open calls. · Chatter, recaps and "watching" posts never enter the ledger — only explicit calls are settled and counted.