@RektProof — settled call record
✓ Source check: 0 unavailable · 1/1 covered · last sweep 2026-09-01
Rate rule: kol_directional_v1 — read the full rule →
95% CI [0.0% – 79.3%] · Wilson 95% interval — where the true rate likely sits.
Last settled 2026-09-01 (0d ago)
Small sample — the interval is wide and the number will move.
BTC
Follow the calls, or just hold BTC?
1 live · 3 backtested — never merged into one number.
Each call is an independent $100 position, closed after 7 days — no compounding, no fees, no slippage. How this is scored →
By coin
By call
By window
| Coin | Call | What they said | Relative (ranked) † | Absolute (vs USD) † | Settled | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTC | ↑ Bullish | Starting the week with my long getting filled and hitting my first TP. Nice continuation range formed for a move outside deviation | MISS -0.5% | -0.5% | 2026-09-01T00:00:16.763252+00:00 | source post → · verdict → |
Relative = altcoins scored against BTC, BTC itself against USD — so BTC rows carry the same number in both columns. Absolute is always vs USD, and never carries a verdict.
Settled after the fact from archived posts — the call was already on the record before we scored it, but we were not watching it live. Kept on a separate line and never merged into the prospective hit rate above.
| Coin | Call | What they said | Relative (ranked) † | Absolute (vs USD) † | Settled | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ETH backtested | ↑ Bullish | Buying 1000$ worth of $ETH daily | MISS -0.5% | +2.8% | 2026-08-17T12:30:06.520249+00:00 | source post → · verdict → |
| BTC backtested | ↑ Bullish | Long taken off a short term range | MISS +2.3% | +2.3% | 2026-08-17T11:00:12.871779+00:00 | source post → · verdict → |
| ETH backtested | ↑ Bullish | Buying 1000$ worth of $ETH daily | HIT +5.4% | +8.5% | 2026-08-17T10:00:05.170542+00:00 | source post → · verdict → |
Relative = altcoins scored against BTC, BTC itself against USD — so BTC rows carry the same number in both columns. Absolute is always vs USD, and never carries a verdict.
Graded under price_target_v1 — did the stated price target print? A different rule, never merged into the directional rate above.
| Coin | Call | Result | Settled | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTC | — | MISS | 2026-09-01 | verdict → |
Settled after the fact from archived posts — the call was already on the record before we scored it, but we were not watching it live. Kept on a separate line and never merged into the prospective hit rate above.
| Coin | Call | Result | Settled | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTC backtested | — | MISS | 2026-08-17 | verdict → |
| ETH backtested | — | MISS | 2026-08-17 | verdict → |
Same ruler on both sides: kol_directional_v1 runs on identical parameters to settle_v1 — a 7-day window, a ±3% band, altcoins scored vs BTC and BTC vs USD. That is why the hit rate above and CoinVerdict's 64% can sit side by side. · How the two differ →
Paste this into your site. The badge updates itself as new calls settle. · Share card (PNG for X)
Live preview — real data, the same script your site loads.
Inline pill · data-cv-style="pill"
Light card · data-cv-style="card"
Dark card · data-cv-style="dark"
Big number · data-cv-style="stat"
Media and creators may cite CoinVerdict data with attribution and a link back.
Source: VeraMind settled-call ledger · only verified settlements, never open calls. · Chatter, recaps and "watching" posts never enter the ledger — only explicit calls are settled and counted.