VET / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
VET’s 47.1% 30-day surge is pressing against 0.007624 resistance
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-30 00:58 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bullish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bullish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — +20.7% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Neutral — +27.5% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Neutral — +18.7% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — +4.3% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — +4.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -0.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — +1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -2.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — -1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -1.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -4.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +0.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -2.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -1.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -1.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -3.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -2.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — +3.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — +1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +5.5% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — +1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — +1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — +2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Neutral — -5.3% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -3.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -2.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -0.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -1.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — +0.7% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 4 exchanges
Invalidation: A daily close below 0.006981 overturns the bullish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.004327 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, your 47.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bullish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: I concede the sharpest bear number: RSI is 77. Resistance to clear sits near $0.007624. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I concede the sharpest bear number: RSI is 77.4, and VET is already 47.1% higher over 30 days. But that heat is not a sell signal by itself; price still sits 8.4% below the 60-day high at 0.007624, while the 7-day advance is carrying real follow-through. Our recent underweight calls on August 16 and August 15 lost as VET beat BTC by 4.3% and 4.1%; today’s data finally shows a clear upside impulse instead of a fading relative move.
Leo, your 47.1% is precisely the exhibit that breaks your case: VET has sprinted into RSI 77.4 while MACD momentum contracts. The 60-day high at 0.007624 is only 8.4% away, and the latest candle closed at 0.006985 after reaching 0.007168—rejection at the doorstep, not proof of clean continuation. The August 16 and August 15 underweight losses do not turn an overextended chart into value.
· RSI 77.4 and contracting MACD histogram
· 60.1% long accounts with 1.50 long/short ratio
· Bearish SMA50/SMA200 structure
Invalidation: A daily close below 0.006981 overturns the bullish ruling.
Mara, a close at 0.006985 after a 0.007168 intraday high is a pullback, not a verdict. The price remains 28.1% above SMA20 and 13.5% above SMA200.
Leo, those same distances describe verticality. SMA50 is still 18.6% below SMA200, so your trend claim is built on the fastest layer of the chart.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(5)
Mara, a close at 0.006985 after a 0.007168 intraday high is a pullback, not a verdict. The price remains 28.1% above SMA20 and 13.5% above SMA200.
Leo, those same distances describe verticality. SMA50 is still 18.6% below SMA200, so your trend claim is built on the fastest layer of the chart.
I’m with Leo on participation, though not on comfort: 60.1% of accounts are long, the ratio is 1.50, and taker flow is modestly buy-led at 1.03. That is bullish demand, but the long skew means a small reversal has an audience ready to run for the exit.
Theo, and no funding rate is supplied, so nobody gets to invent confirmation from derivatives. Fear&Greed at 69 says liquidity is paying for optimism, while the macro headline tape offers no VET-specific balance-sheet support.
Dmitri, the ruling horizon is weeks, not a permanent macro blessing. A move back through 0.007168 and toward 0.007624 would make the old moving-average objection lagging debris.
I rule for the bulls: the decisive exhibit is the combination of +21.1% in 7 days and price holding 13.5% above SMA200 despite the bearish SMA50/SMA200 structure. This differs from the August 15 and August 16 underweight losses because the current pack shows stronger absolute momentum, a 77.4 RSI, and only 8.4% to the 60-day high. My ruling is invalidated by a daily close below 0.006981, the latest candle’s low.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Direction: bullish. Evidence families: RSI(14) 77.4; price is +28.1% versus SMA20 and +39.5% versus SMA50; 7d gain +21.1% and 30d gain +47.1%. Conflicts: SMA50 remains 18.6% below SMA200 and MACD histogram is contracting. Sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Direction: bullish. Evidence families: Fear&Greed 69; long accounts 60.1% with a 1.50 long/short ratio; taker buy/sell 1.03. Conflicts: greed and long skew create a crowded, fragile rally; StockTwits evidence is only 2 bullish versus 0 bearish messages. Sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Ed Walsh: The VET headlines are momentum-positive, citing a 6.33% surge, VIP-255, and a broader crypto rally. The $1.1 million crypto-card hack is sector risk, not a VET-specific catalyst, while the $0.0073 rejection headline flags immediate overhead supply.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
Priya Anand: The pack supplies no fresh VeChain adoption, revenue, issuance, or token-economics figures. VIP-255 is mentioned in headlines, but the evidence is too thin for a fundamental thesis, so this call rests on price structure and market participation.
0b2da658e729a9be761c88383a4385eea874582575ed1898f9aabddf7d5c7f9e0071e3de26d06e3c755183e93ee239d43345bcb211c72f3e329230375244b41bCommitted 2026-08-31T00:20:00+00:00 · 92 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-23 · 2026-08-21 · 2026-08-20