VET / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
VET sits at $0.004711 with RSI 45.3, while its bearish moving-average structure keeps pressure pointed lower
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-07-19 06:30 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A+
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-29 — Overweight — -1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-28 — Overweight — -4.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-27 — Overweight — +4.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-25 — Overweight — +17.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — +20.7% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Neutral — +27.5% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Neutral — +18.7% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — +4.3% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — +4.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -0.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — +1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -2.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — -1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -1.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -4.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +0.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -2.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -1.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -1.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -3.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -2.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — +3.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — +1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +5.5% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — +1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — +1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — +2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Neutral — -5.3% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -3.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -2.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -0.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -1.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — +0.7% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions
Invalidation: A sustained close above $0.00479 would invalidate the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.004249 voids this research. Confidence High — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, your spring is sitting below every major moving average, and the MACD histogram is contracting rather than expanding.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, your spring is sitting below every major moving average, and the MACD histogram is contracting rather than expanding. Key support to defend sits near $0.004249. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugliest number, colleagues: VET trades 35.0% below its SMA200 and the 60-day high is 32.4% away. But RSI at 45.3 isn’t capitulation, MACD histogram is still positive at +1.972e-05, and takers are buying at 1.17; that’s a coiled spring, not a corpse.
Leo, your spring is sitting below every major moving average, and the MACD histogram is contracting rather than expanding. A positive histogram cannot erase the 7-day loss of 2.8%, the 30-day loss of 4.1%, or the fact that VET is only 10.9% above its 60-day low.
· Fear-driven rebound from RSI 45.3
· Taker buy/sell at 1.17
· No funding-rate confirmation
Invalidation: A sustained close above $0.00479 would invalidate the bearish ruling.
Mara, Fear & Greed at 28 means the bad news is crowded. If VET holds $0.004249, the asymmetry favors a rebound toward the $0.00479 intraday high.
Leo, the crowd isn’t cleanly washed out: 57.0% of accounts are long and the long/short ratio is 1.33. That trapped-long bias gives sellers fuel if $0.004249 breaks.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, Fear & Greed at 28 means the bad news is crowded. If VET holds $0.004249, the asymmetry favors a rebound toward the $0.00479 intraday high.
Leo, the crowd isn’t cleanly washed out: 57.0% of accounts are long and the long/short ratio is 1.33. That trapped-long bias gives sellers fuel if $0.004249 breaks.
I’m with Mara on the positioning math, but taker buy/sell at 1.17 says buyers are still probing. The trouble is that no funding-rate data confirms whether those longs are expensive or being flushed.
Theo, probing bids don’t create a liquidity regime. With no VET-specific news catalyst and price 35.0% below SMA200, I’d sell the bounce until the chart proves otherwise.
I pick the bears, and the decisive exhibit is VET’s price at $0.004711, 35.0% below SMA200 with SMA50 32.6% below SMA200. The rebound case fails if $0.004249 breaks, while a close above $0.00479 would overturn my ruling.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Bearish. Evidence families: RSI at 45.3, price below SMA20 by 0.6%, SMA50 by 3.5%, and SMA200 by 35.0%; SMA50 sits 32.6% below SMA200, while MACD histogram is positive but contracting. Conflict: MACD histogram remains positive. Sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Bearish. Evidence families: Fear & Greed at 28, 57.0% long accounts with a 1.33 long/short ratio, and taker buy/sell at 1.17. Conflict: modest buying pressure and a slight long majority could support a bounce. Sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
The headline tape is not VET-specific: it ranges from Zcash privacy infrastructure and Polymarket restrictions to stablecoins overtaking payments in Brazil. I see no concrete VET catalyst in this pack to counter a 7-day decline of 2.8% and a 30-day decline of 4.1%.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
The data pack provides no VET-specific adoption, revenue, supply, or valuation figures. Without fundamental weight, the verdict rests on weak structure and fearful-but-still-long positioning.
3bd84c648474e1f7d87c9a3ece07a0330868b389d2d8d24ff293aa28844182bff4fc7312c5be5f7d7eea56f69a8be2b8607d9ddd9672db388d49defd4b1498d1Committed 2026-07-24T10:21:07+00:00 · 67 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-09-05 · 2026-09-01 · 2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-23