VET / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
VET holds 0.00488 USD with RSI at 52.5, but the long-term trend still leans bearish
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-07-23 00:23 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Mixed
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Mixed
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-29 — Overweight — -1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-28 — Overweight — -4.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-27 — Overweight — +4.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-25 — Overweight — +17.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — +20.7% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Neutral — +27.5% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Neutral — +18.7% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — +4.3% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — +4.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -0.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — +1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -2.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — -1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -1.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -4.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +0.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -2.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -1.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -1.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -3.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -2.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — +3.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — +1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +5.5% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — +1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — +1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — +2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Neutral — -5.3% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -3.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -2.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -0.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -1.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — +0.7% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 4 exchanges
Invalidation: The bearish swing view is invalidated if VET reclaims 0.006772, or if the bearish SMA50/SMA200 structure reverses.. Cautious read: a break below $0.004249 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, you’re polishing a three-week bounce while ignoring the cliff above it.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Mixed, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, you’re polishing a three-week bounce while ignoring the cliff above it. Key support to defend sits near $0.004249. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugliest number: VET sits 31.4% below its SMA200 and the SMA50 is 32.4% underneath it. But Leo sees the near-term engine turning—RSI is 52.5, MACD histogram is expanding at +3.103e-05, and 7-day performance is +3.2%; that’s more than dead-cat theater until price proves otherwise.
Leo, you’re polishing a three-week bounce while ignoring the cliff above it. VET is still 27.9% below the 60-day high of 0.006772, and the bearish moving-average structure says your momentum is trapped beneath overhead supply, not escaping it.
· crowded 62.1% long positioning
· broad crypto risk-off
· regulatory headline volatility
Invalidation: The bearish swing view is invalidated if VET reclaims 0.006772, or if the bearish SMA50/SMA200 structure reverses.
Mara, the market doesn’t need to reclaim 0.006772 tomorrow. Holding 0.00488 while staying 1.7% above SMA20 and 1.5% above SMA50 keeps the short-term bid alive.
Leo, that bid is crowded: 62.1% of accounts are long. If 0.004249 breaks, those optimistic longs become forced sellers, and your tidy RSI narrative gets steamrolled.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, the market doesn’t need to reclaim 0.006772 tomorrow. Holding 0.00488 while staying 1.7% above SMA20 and 1.5% above SMA50 keeps the short-term bid alive.
Leo, that bid is crowded: 62.1% of accounts are long. If 0.004249 breaks, those optimistic longs become forced sellers, and your tidy RSI narrative gets steamrolled.
I’ll interrupt both of you: taker buy/sell is 1.08, so buyers have a real, if narrow, flow advantage. But there’s no funding data here—anyone claiming leveraged conviction beyond the account split is inventing evidence.
And the tape is still exposed to macro risk-off. A recent 3.9% VET drop during broad crypto weakness tells me liquidity can erase this small momentum premium quickly.
I rule for the bears on the decisive exhibit: VET is 31.4% below SMA200 while SMA50 is 32.4% below SMA200. The short-term momentum is credible, but it hasn’t repaired the larger trend; I overturn this ruling only if VET reclaims 0.006772 or the SMA50/SMA200 spread materially reverses.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
I see a short-term recovery: VET is 1.7% above its SMA20, 1.5% above SMA50, with a rising MACD histogram of +3.103e-05 and gains of 3.2% over 7 days and 3.9% over 30 days. But price remains 31.4% below SMA200, while SMA50 sits 32.4% below SMA200; that’s a rally inside a damaged structure.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
The crowd is fearful at Fear&Greed 31, yet long accounts already control 62.1% with an L/S ratio of 1.64. Taker buy/sell at 1.08 gives bulls a modest flow edge, but the positioning is vulnerable if VET loses 0.004249.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
The VeChain-specific headlines are constructive, including the July 20 X livestream and a bullish TradingView tag, but the market backdrop is less friendly. Broader crypto risk-off pressure has already been linked to a 3.9% VET drop, while debate over the Clarity Act adds regulatory headline risk rather than a clear catalyst.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
The pack provides no operating, adoption, revenue, supply, or valuation data for VeChain. The evidence therefore supports a market-structure verdict, not a fundamental investment thesis.
c06ef7cf3f1d7c029ad55f3dd119e02a73fa3a8c034b158ba7ccfcf1020e0a1e8624d818ee7811d0e765aa63f60423eb1e28fec5823b0c3f5024085df84084a2Committed 2026-07-24T10:21:07+00:00 · 100 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-09-05 · 2026-09-01 · 2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-23