OP / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
OP at $0.0973 sits 35.1% below its 200-day average as bears retain control
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-07-23 00:21 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-29 — Underweight — +7.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-28 — Underweight — +2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-27 — Underweight — -0.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-26 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-25 — Underweight — -9.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-24 — Overweight — -21.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Overweight — -20.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-22 — Overweight — — — VOID
2026-08-21 — Underweight — -8.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Neutral — -4.3% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — +5.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -5.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -4.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -1.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +3.3% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — +3.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -1.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — +3.0% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — +4.0% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +0.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -4.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -7.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -8.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -4.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -5.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -4.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -4.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -0.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -2.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -8.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -5.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -5.3% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: A sustained close above $0.100 with RSI(14) above 50 invalidates the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.0885 voids this research. Confidence High — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, your spring is still buried beneath three moving averages.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, your spring is still buried beneath three moving averages. Key support to defend sits near $0.0885. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugly number, Mara: OP is 35.1% under SMA200 and has fallen 4.0% over 30 days. But RSI at 44.5 isn’t capitulation, MACD is contracting its negative histogram, and taker buy/sell at 1.08 says sellers are losing some punch; this can be a battered spring, not a fresh breakdown.
Leo, your spring is still buried beneath three moving averages. A contracting MACD histogram does not erase price at $0.0973, the 3.1% SMA20 gap, the 3.9% SMA50 gap, or the 27.7% distance from the 60-day high; you’re polishing exhaustion and calling it momentum.
· Crypto-wide regulatory and ETF-driven rally
· Ethereum Foundation/Korean policy engagement
· Short-term taker buying at 1.08
Invalidation: A sustained close above $0.100 with RSI(14) above 50 invalidates the bearish ruling.
Mara, the 60-day low is $0.0885, only 9.8% below spot, while negative momentum is already slowing. A close back above $0.100 would force your short thesis to answer real demand.
Leo, $0.100 is barely above the current $0.0973 and still says nothing against the SMA20. Until OP reclaims $0.100 and then holds it, that tiny bounce is just noise inside a downtrend.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, the 60-day low is $0.0885, only 9.8% below spot, while negative momentum is already slowing. A close back above $0.100 would force your short thesis to answer real demand.
Leo, $0.100 is barely above the current $0.0973 and still says nothing against the SMA20. Until OP reclaims $0.100 and then holds it, that tiny bounce is just noise inside a downtrend.
I’m with Leo on one narrow point: 48.9% long accounts and a 0.96 L/S ratio are not a crowded-long trap. But Mara gets the tape: taker buy/sell at 1.08 is a modest bid, not proof of sustained accumulation.
Neither side gets to invent a liquidity rescue. The pack gives crypto optimism, but OP is still 27.7% below its 60-day high, and no macro headline has translated into an OP price reversal.
I award the ruling to the bears, and the single decisive exhibit is OP trading 35.1% below SMA200 with SMA50 32.5% below SMA200. I would overturn this bearish call only on a sustained close above $0.100 accompanied by RSI reclaiming 50.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Kai Nakamura: I’m bearish. OP trades 3.1% below SMA20, 3.9% below SMA50, and 35.1% below SMA200; the SMA50 is 32.5% beneath the SMA200. RSI 44.5 and a contracting MACD histogram at -8.439e-05 show selling pressure easing, but not a reversal.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Sofia Reyes: Fear&Greed is 31, and only 48.9% of long accounts remain bullish with an L/S ratio of 0.96. Taker buy/sell at 1.08 offers a small countertrend bid, but the crowd is fearful rather than positioned for a decisive recovery.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Ed Walsh: OP has useful visibility from meetings with the Ethereum Foundation and Korean financial and policy leaders. The broader crypto backdrop is friendlier around ETF inflows and regulatory optimism, but the Clarity Act debate is unresolved and no OP-specific catalyst is quantified.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
Priya Anand: The data pack supplies no token-economics, revenue, valuation, unlock, or supply metrics. The Seoul meetings are strategic visibility, not evidence of near-term value capture.
4facef29d484ce9ce068714e146a66e5e2fa5875510b2aca8581389129b4e3fc8624d818ee7811d0e765aa63f60423eb1e28fec5823b0c3f5024085df84084a2Committed 2026-07-24T10:21:07+00:00 · 100 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-09-05 · 2026-09-01 · 2026-08-31 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24