OP / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
OP trades at $0.0963, still pinned beneath a bearish moving-average stack
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-07-22 09:02 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-29 — Underweight — +7.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-28 — Underweight — +2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-27 — Underweight — -0.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-26 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-25 — Underweight — -9.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-24 — Overweight — -21.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Overweight — -20.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-22 — Overweight — — — VOID
2026-08-21 — Underweight — -8.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Neutral — -4.3% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — +5.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -5.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -4.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -1.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +3.3% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — +3.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -1.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — +3.0% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — +4.0% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +0.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -4.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -7.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -8.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -4.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -5.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -4.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -4.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -0.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -2.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -8.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -5.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -5.3% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions
Invalidation: A sustained move above $0.1030 would reclaim the short-term breakdown zone and overturn the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.0885 voids this research. Confidence High — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, you’re calling a contracting MACD a springboard while price remains 4.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, you’re calling a contracting MACD a springboard while price remains 4. Key support to defend sits near $0.0885. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugly exhibit, colleagues: OP is 36.3% below SMA200 and has fallen 5.8% in seven days. But the MACD histogram is contracting at -0.0002494, and Fear & Greed is already down at 33; that’s stale damage and crowded pessimism, not fresh fuel for another straight-line collapse. If the broader Bitcoin rally keeps its footing, OP can spring from the $0.0885 floor.
Leo, you’re calling a contracting MACD a springboard while price remains 4.5% below SMA20 and 5.4% below SMA50. The decisive number is not the histogram’s smaller negative print; it’s the 32.7% bearish SMA50-versus-SMA200 spread, which says the trend is structurally broken. A $0.0885 floor eight-point-seven percent below price is an exposed ledge, not proof of support.
· Broader Bitcoin regulatory and ETF-flow rally
· MACD contraction and potential oversold bounce
· Taker buy/sell at 1.08
Invalidation: A sustained move above $0.1030 would reclaim the short-term breakdown zone and overturn the bearish ruling.
Mara, structural damage is visible, but RSI 42.9 is not capitulation. With taker buy/sell at 1.08, sellers aren’t exactly marching in formation.
Leo, 1.08 is a thin tactical flicker against only 46.9% long accounts and a 0.88 L/S ratio. Buyers have failed to reclaim even SMA20; that’s the number your bounce thesis can’t answer.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, structural damage is visible, but RSI 42.9 is not capitulation. With taker buy/sell at 1.08, sellers aren’t exactly marching in formation.
Leo, 1.08 is a thin tactical flicker against only 46.9% long accounts and a 0.88 L/S ratio. Buyers have failed to reclaim even SMA20; that’s the number your bounce thesis can’t answer.
Leo, I’ll grant the buy-taker edge, but positioning gives Mara the cleaner read: Fear & Greed at 33 and sub-50% long accounts do not show a bullish crowd ready to force a squeeze. They show weak sponsorship.
Mara, your chart is right, but don’t overstate it: Bitcoin headlines carry regulatory and ETF-flow support. Still, OP has no coin-specific news catalyst in this pack, so macro tailwind alone is a leaky umbrella.
I rule for Mara Frost’s bears, and my decisive exhibit is the bearish moving-average structure: price is 36.3% below SMA200 while SMA50 sits 32.7% below SMA200. My ruling is overturned by a sustained reclaim above $0.1030, which would repair the immediate trend and invalidate the breakdown thesis.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Kai Nakamura: Bearish. OP sits 4.5% below SMA20, 5.4% below SMA50, and 36.3% below SMA200; SMA50 is 32.7% beneath SMA200. RSI at 42.9 and a contracting MACD histogram of -0.0002494 show weakening momentum, not a reversal.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Sofia Reyes: Bearish. Fear & Greed is 33, while only 46.9% of long accounts remain and the L/S ratio is 0.88. Taker buy/sell at 1.08 is a modest conflict, but it has not repaired the broader fear profile.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Ed Walsh: Bullish for the broader crypto tape, not specifically for OP. Headlines cite Bitcoin above $66K, ETF inflows, CLARITY Act optimism, and rate-cut bets, but the pack offers no OP-specific catalyst. The separate $1 million exploit draining a bitcoin vault is a reminder that crypto headline risk cuts both ways.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
Priya Anand: Limited. The data pack contains no OP token-supply, unlock, revenue, usage, or valuation figures. Without those exhibits, the verdict rests on price structure and market positioning rather than fundamental token economics.
bc6b9300bcbc4db2f409f578dc0eb0912618812cf061f26b80f0cf99fd654f63d60befb007b8b2c9bb2f3e860a595495bb4427a42c1d8f8851947ca5b9c4caf9Committed 2026-07-24T10:21:07+00:00 · 98 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-09-05 · 2026-09-01 · 2026-08-31 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24