OP / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
OP’s bearish structure deepens as price sits 36.7% below its 200-day average
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-07-17 00:22 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A+
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-29 — Underweight — +7.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-28 — Underweight — +2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-27 — Underweight — -0.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-26 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-25 — Underweight — -9.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-24 — Overweight — -21.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Overweight — -20.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-22 — Overweight — — — VOID
2026-08-21 — Underweight — -8.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Neutral — -4.3% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — +5.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -5.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -4.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -1.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +3.3% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — +3.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -1.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — +3.0% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — +4.0% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +0.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -4.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -7.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -8.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -4.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -5.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -4.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -4.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -0.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -2.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -8.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -5.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -5.3% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated if OP closes above $0.0989 with RSI(14) above 50 and holds the level.. Cautious read: a break below $0.0885 voids this research. Confidence High — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, that is precisely the hopium trick: calling a live downtrend “priced in” without a reversal exhibit.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, that is precisely the hopium trick: calling a live downtrend “priced in” without a reversal exhibit. Key support to defend sits near $0.0885. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugliest number, Mara: OP is 36.7% beneath its SMA200, and the 60-day drawdown is brutal. But RSI at 43.6 isn’t a panic print, Fear & Greed at 27 is already broadcasting despair, and price is only 11.5% above the 60-day low—much of the bad news is stale and priced into this battered tape.
Leo, that is precisely the hopium trick: calling a live downtrend “priced in” without a reversal exhibit. OP is below every major average, the SMA50 trails the SMA200 by 33.2%, MACD is expanding negatively, and the asset has still lost 9.2% in 30 days. RSI at 43.6 proves sellers have room, not that they’re finished.
· Oversold relief rally
· Break above $0.0989
· Broad crypto liquidity surge
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated if OP closes above $0.0989 with RSI(14) above 50 and holds the level.
Mara, you’re treating trend readings as destiny. At $0.0987, OP is close enough to the $0.0885 60-day floor that a modest relief move can punish late shorts.
Close to support isn’t support, Leo. Price is still 11.5% above that floor, while taker buy/sell is only 0.92—buyers aren’t stepping in with conviction.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, you’re treating trend readings as destiny. At $0.0987, OP is close enough to the $0.0885 60-day floor that a modest relief move can punish late shorts.
Close to support isn’t support, Leo. Price is still 11.5% above that floor, while taker buy/sell is only 0.92—buyers aren’t stepping in with conviction.
Leo, the positioning is hardly a squeeze setup: long accounts are 49.9% and the L/S ratio is 0.99. Theo’s ledger says neutrality in accounts, weakness in taker flow—not bullish fuel.
And the macro headlines don’t rescue OP, Leo. A multi-token ETF, Visa’s stablecoin push, and exchange investment may lift the sector, but none supplies OP-specific liquidity or demand.
I rule for the bears, with the decisive exhibit being OP’s 36.7% discount to SMA200 alongside an expanding negative MACD histogram. Fear at 27 may fuel a bounce, but I would overturn this ruling only if OP reclaims $0.0989 and RSI(14) rises above 50 while holding that breakout.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Direction: bearish. Evidence families: moving averages, momentum, trend returns, support/resistance. Conflicts: RSI(14) at 43.6 is weak but not oversold; price remains 11.5% above the 60-day low. Sufficiency: adequate. I see OP at $0.0987, below SMA20 by 2.7%, SMA50 by 5.2%, and SMA200 by 36.7%. The SMA50 sits 33.2% below the SMA200, while MACD histogram at -0.0000554 is expanding.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Direction: bearish. Evidence families: Fear & Greed, account positioning, taker flow. Conflicts: long accounts at 49.9% show no crowded-long extreme. Sufficiency: adequate. Fear & Greed at 27 and a 0.92 taker buy/sell ratio show defensive demand, while the 0.99 long/short ratio says the crowd has not fully capitulated.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Direction: neutral. The headlines show institutional crypto expansion, including T. Rowe Price’s first multi-token crypto ETF and Visa’s Open USD platform. None of the listed developments directly improves Optimism-specific demand, token economics, or OP cash flows.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
Direction: neutral. The data pack provides no OP-specific revenue, unlock, supply, adoption, or valuation figures. Broader institutional infrastructure news is constructive for crypto, but it does not establish a fundamental catalyst for OP.
7ba85e639589e301658c3822fa3bffe460ed9e5fb8bafdedeb9b23f49bc295de70e6e12fe78524df5289beb80d3f4382c89c73b1c7a527091a8c313a2bcf59adCommitted 2026-07-24T10:21:07+00:00 · 67 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-09-05 · 2026-09-01 · 2026-08-31 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24