GRASS / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
GRASS sits at $0.31025 with RSI 44.8 and a 15.3% 30-day slide
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-19 03:14 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Overweight — +4.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — +19.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Neutral — +7.1% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Neutral — -25.5% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -18.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -13.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — +12.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +10.3% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — +10.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — +2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +1.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -7.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -9.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -6.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -5.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -3.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -9.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — -2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -7.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -6.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -12.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Neutral — -12.8% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Neutral — -7.1% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 4 exchanges
Invalidation: A sustained move above $0.365 would overturn the bearish ruling by reclaiming the key medium-term breakdown zone.. Cautious read: a break below $0.2813 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, that “springboard” is a rubber band stretched beneath a falling staircase.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, that “springboard” is a rubber band stretched beneath a falling staircase. Key support to defend sits near $0.2813. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede Mara’s sharpest number: GRASS is 14.0% below SMA50 and down 15.3% over 30 days. But the tape has stopped bleeding near $0.2813, price is 0.3% above SMA20, the 7-day return is +2.0%, and SMA50 still sits 4.8% above SMA200—more springboard than corpse. The three recent underweight losses on August 7, 8, and 9, at +10.4%, +10.3%, and +12.9% versus BTC, prove this coin can punish stale bearishness.
Leo, that “springboard” is a rubber band stretched beneath a falling staircase. The decisive exhibit is not the 0.3% SMA20 reclaim; it is the 14.0% SMA50 gap, with RSI only 44.8 and MACD histogram contracting at +0.004673. Those August 7–9 underweight losses are real, but they describe relative BTC strength then—not evidence that today’s damaged structure has repaired itself.
I see more upside than the ruling allows: a rebound from the $0.2813 60-day low could travel toward the $0.365 area while price is already 0.3% above SMA20 and up 2.0% over 7 days. The August 7–9 underweight calls lost 10.4%, 10.3%, and 12.9% versus BTC, so bearish conviction has recently underestimated GRASS’s reflexivity.
The fastest failure is a break of $0.2813, the only concrete nearby floor, because RSI 44.8 is not deeply washed out and MACD is contracting. The fragile exhibit is the bullish SMA structure—SMA50 over SMA200 by 4.8%—since price still trails SMA50 by 14.0% and SMA200 by 9.9%.
Leo overreaches by treating a 0.3% SMA20 reclaim as a reversal; Mara overreaches only if she treats the past three losses as irrelevant. The deciding condition is whether GRASS holds $0.2813 while reclaiming $0.365; without that recovery, the 14.0% SMA50 gap keeps the bear case ahead.
· rebound from the $0.2813 low
· bullish SMA50/SMA200 structure
· recent relative-strength losses on August 7–9
Invalidation: A sustained move above $0.365 would overturn the bearish ruling by reclaiming the key medium-term breakdown zone.
Mara, the 60-day low is $0.2813, just 10.3% below price, while the 7-day tape is already +2.0%. A nearby floor matters more than a distant $0.6032 high.
Leo, a floor is not a reversal. At $0.31025, GRASS remains 48.5% beneath that $0.6032 high, and the 30-day loss is still 15.3%.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, the 60-day low is $0.2813, just 10.3% below price, while the 7-day tape is already +2.0%. A nearby floor matters more than a distant $0.6032 high.
Leo, a floor is not a reversal. At $0.31025, GRASS remains 48.5% beneath that $0.6032 high, and the 30-day loss is still 15.3%.
I’m with Mara on crowd structure: 62.5% of long accounts and a 1.66 L/S ratio meet a 0.98 taker buy/sell ratio. That is optimistic accounting with weak immediate demand, and funding is unavailable, so no squeeze thesis is confirmed.
The macro headlines offer no GRASS-specific liquidity impulse. Robinhood’s tokenized-stock push and Cuomo’s regulatory warning are broad policy noise, not a catalyst capable of erasing a 14.0% SMA50 deficit.
I rule for the bear side: the decisive exhibit is GRASS’s price 14.0% below SMA50 while the MACD histogram contracts at +0.004673. The recent August 7–9 underweight losses make this different only because the current pack shows renewed structural weakness, not merely relative underperformance; the ruling is invalidated by a sustained move above $0.365, which would materially reclaim the damaged medium-term structure.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Direction: bearish. Evidence families: RSI 44.8, price below SMA50 by 14.0% and SMA200 by 9.9%, 30-day return -15.3%; the bullish conflict is SMA50 above SMA200 by 4.8%, price 0.3% above SMA20, and MACD histogram still positive at +0.004673. Sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Direction: bearish. Evidence families: Fear & Greed at 46, long accounts at 62.5% with an L/S ratio of 1.66, and taker buy/sell at 0.98; StockTwits contributes no usable sample with 0 messages. Sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Ed Walsh: The headlines are policy aspirations, not GRASS-specific catalysts. The local news is mostly conversion pages, referral promotion, and airdrop-calendar coverage, leaving no verified fundamental event to interrupt the chart’s downtrend.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
Priya Anand: The data pack supplies no token-supply, unlock, revenue, usage, or valuation figures. Referral and airdrop mentions may attract attention, but they do not establish durable demand for GRASS.
67910df56afaf4f6af9b791cc26c16bcd6e84ce9c5ef432efbb082ce58c6f7670f1b74c5d5aa8bd9fe0e079b811d2482b9bd27566afea1ff19e554ca5230c439Committed 2026-08-20T00:20:00+00:00 · 73 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23