ETC / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
ETC sits at $6.211 with RSI 31.0, but the bearish structure still controls the tape
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-16 01:02 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Neutral — -8.0% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -7.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Underweight — +2.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — +4.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — +5.5% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -2.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -1.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — -1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -3.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — -1.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -3.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -4.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -3.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -5.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -4.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -2.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — -2.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -4.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -0.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — +3.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -0.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -0.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -0.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — +2.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -3.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -3.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -3.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -2.8% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated by a sustained reclaim of $7.763, or by RSI(14) rising above 50 alongside a move back over SMA20.. Cautious read: a break below $6.10 voids this research. Confidence High — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, that $6.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, that $6. Key support to defend sits near $6.10. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugliest number, Mara: ETC is 22.3% under its SMA200 and has lost 11.7% in 30 days. But RSI at 31.0 says the spring is compressed, MACD’s -0.01485 histogram is contracting, and price is only 1.8% above the 60-day low at $6.103—most of the panic may already be in the candle.
Leo, that $6.103 proximity isn’t a spring; it’s a ledge. Your oversold case cannot erase the -15.2% SMA50-versus-SMA200 structure, the 0.96 taker buy/sell ratio, or the 55.0% long-account share that shows buyers are still catching a falling blade.
· oversold bounce from RSI 31.0
· support failure near $6.103
· broader crypto liquidity reversal
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated by a sustained reclaim of $7.763, or by RSI(14) rising above 50 alongside a move back over SMA20.
Leo, you’re treating RSI 31.0 as a reversal signal when the 7-day and 30-day returns are still -3.1% and -11.7%. What, exactly, breaks the downtrend besides hope?
Mara, the immediate downside is already crowded around $6.103, just 1.8% below price. A contracting MACD histogram at -0.01485 can turn a small catalyst into a sharp relief move.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Leo, you’re treating RSI 31.0 as a reversal signal when the 7-day and 30-day returns are still -3.1% and -11.7%. What, exactly, breaks the downtrend besides hope?
Mara, the immediate downside is already crowded around $6.103, just 1.8% below price. A contracting MACD histogram at -0.01485 can turn a small catalyst into a sharp relief move.
Leo, the flow tape doesn’t confirm that relief: taker buy/sell is 0.96, and long accounts are 55.0% with an L/S ratio of 1.22. That’s not capitulation; it’s residual optimism absorbing pressure.
Theo’s point matters because the tape has no ETC-specific macro catalyst. With ETC down 20.0% from the 60-day high of $7.763, liquidity can keep favoring the established trend rather than rewarding a technical bounce.
I rule for the bear side: ETC is bearish, and the decisive exhibit is the -15.2% SMA50/SMA200 structure reinforced by price sitting 22.3% below SMA200. This ruling is overturned by a sustained move above $7.763 or a clear RSI recovery above 50 while price reclaims SMA20.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
RSI(14) is 31.0, yet ETC remains 4.0% below SMA20, 8.3% below SMA50, and 22.3% below SMA200. The SMA50/SMA200 spread is -15.2%, while MACD histogram stays negative at -0.01485; direction: bearish, evidence families: trend, moving averages, momentum, conflicts: RSI is near oversold and MACD is contracting, sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Fear&Greed reads 34, long accounts still lead at 55.0% with an L/S ratio of 1.22, and taker buy/sell is 0.96. Fear is visible, but the crowd has not fully abandoned the long side; direction: bearish, evidence families: fear gauge, account skew, taker flow, conflicts: outright fear can support a reflex bounce, sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
The ETC-specific headlines are mostly generic prediction and explainer pieces, not catalysts with measurable network or institutional impact. The broader headlines about Unitree and UBS do not provide a direct ETC transmission channel.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
The data pack provides no fresh ETC issuance, usage, hash-rate, developer, treasury, or valuation metrics. Fundamental direction is neutral-to-bearish by omission of a concrete catalyst, but evidence is limited.
345032c191facb103d54d890732a820acf5efc6b67d1c217320773f7456368fceaff5f24ed3adac83e409d856a55f50f8d212bab4f7befa37a3192bd7340acc9Committed 2026-08-17T00:20:00+00:00 · 89 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23 · 2026-08-22